Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Agree that it was probably his poorest overall game since he got back in, but he scored and was involved in the build up to the first goal too so he contributed in a positive way to the result still.

 

Definitely earned the shirt for the time being, Gordon wasn't great pre-suspension and should feature from the bench when he's back, at least initially. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

His goal was easy, but he was key in us scoring that anyway with a good run from deep in our own half.

 

Showed good work with Tino again as well.

 

Deserves to be our left wing starter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s doing well. Producing when needed, even if overall highs are not close to what Gordon has giving us.
 

Long may it continue because we need to get into a position where we can have 5 across the three forward positions, where rotation can be made and performance levels remain the same. Too often we end up needing to run the main three into the ground due to a reluctance to rotate at times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KDT said:

I don't seem to be going with the tide here but I thought Barnes was pretty poor last night, apart from the easy pass to Livramento for his assist he gave the ball away either with bad passes or just losing the ball a lot in the first 30 minutes. His goal was more being in the right place at the right time and was really on a plate for him, I can't remember much from him in the second half either. His one good piece of play was the break and pass over for Isak at the tail end of the first half, overall though I thought he was poor. 

He also started the move for his goal driving up the pitch. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, The College Dropout said:

He also started the move for his goal driving up the pitch. 

 

Yeah sorry I've confused myself, the move with Isak was the one for his goal. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if against Crystal Palace who we seem to have a ball ache breaking down, you could sacrifice Joelinton and maybe go with all 3 of Barnes, Gordon & Murphy, with Tonali & Bruno the double pivot?

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

Wonder if against Crystal Palace who we seem to have a ball ache breaking down, you could sacrifice Joelinton and maybe go with all 3 of Barnes, Gordon & Murphy, with Tonali & Bruno the double pivot?

 

Risky to take a midfielder out when they have 2 number 10s who cause havoc, and capable possession CMs as well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, andycap said:

Well bruno isak Murphy are the main ones. 

Eh? :lol: 

 

Murphy scored two goals in the last game, and got an assist against Brentford, Isak scored against Brentford and should have had an assist himself, and Bruno has been his usual full of energy self, even if he was off it against Brentford a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 54 said:

Eh? :lol: 

 

Murphy scored two goals in the last game, and got an assist against Brentford, Isak scored against Brentford and should have had an assist himself, and Bruno has been his usual full of energy self, even if he was off it against Brentford a bit.

Murphy has been piss poor so has isak and bruno. 

He may have scored but the performances  have been lacking. 

Just because you score a goal doesn't mean you played well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:


Crazy take. 

My opinion. if your happy watching bruno isak Murphy play poorly and us struggling to keep possession then great. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, andycap said:

Murphy has been piss poor so has isak and bruno. 

He may have scored but the performances  have been lacking. 

Just because you score a goal doesn't mean you played well. 

 

Fucking hell I knew who the poster was here before I even looked at the username [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, andycap said:

My opinion. if your happy watching bruno isak Murphy play poorly and us struggling to keep possession then great. 

 

What's the solution you reckon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...