r0cafella Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 I wouldn’t dare have the temerity to go against Orny. 6 year deal seems a bit of risk on our side mine given the injury record. I guess the other side of the coin is if he gets over his injuries we have tied down for a long time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 I have a feeling we might bring out a back 3 more this season and he seems absolutely perfect for a LCB in that structure. Very, very handy player if he can stay fit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 6 years seems mad, just renew him if he's doing well. I'm going with 4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Somewhere between 1 and 10 is what I've been told. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonny1403 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 8 minutes ago, r0cafella said: I wouldn’t dare have the temerity to go against Orny. 6 year deal seems a bit of risk on our side mine given the injury record. I guess the other side of the coin is if he gets over his injuries we have tied down for a long time. It isn't 6 though. The option is for us to extend if we want to - there's no obligation on our side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 5 minutes ago, jonny1403 said: It isn't 6 though. The option is for us to extend if we want to - there's no obligation on our side. Ok so it’s five, doesn’t really change the risk on our side if his injury history doesn’t improve. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 5+1 is brazy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Tend to believe Orny Orny Orny the most. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 With us missing out on Tosin I wouldn't be surprised if we've been a bit more flexible in negotiations when it comes to contract length. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 3rd choice LCB (2nd for now), 2nd choice LB. I like it. Retire Burn at LB. Compete with him at LCB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Think he'll be 1st choice LB come first game of the season as long as Schar and Burn is fit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geogaddi Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 15 hours ago, STM said: If we sign Kelly, I'd reckon our back 4 come the first game will be: Trippier Schar Burn Kelly Perhaps by the end of the season we might see: Tino Schar Botman Hall Of course I'd like to see us go big on another CB to compete with Schar but we will have to see what happens with our budget. Tino should be starting as our main right back next season mind . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Don't be fooled by the rocks that I've got, I'm still Kelly from the block Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 (edited) 19 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: 3rd choice LCB (2nd for now), 2nd choice LB. I like it. Retire Burn at LB. Compete with him at LCB. Don't get your hopes up. We were certain that he wouldn't be our LB last season. Edited June 11 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 40 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: 6 years seems mad, just renew him if he's doing well. I'm going with 4. Just covers a future sale. Can get 4 years out of him, then sell him without worrying about his contract. Still performing, can either give him a deal, or keep him around for essentially 2 more years as a squad player (which if you are a well functioning club, the sale would've been made). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 5 minutes ago, joeyt said: Don't be fooled by the rocks that I've got, I'm still Kelly from the block Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 I’m not a fraud Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 (edited) 8 minutes ago, joeyt said: Don't be fooled by the rocks that I've got, I'm still Kelly from the block I don’t think you’re ready for this Kelly Edited June 11 by GeordieDazzler Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
janpawel Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Who will start at LCB, him or Burn? Or will Hall be benched for him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 I've not read the Ornstein article, but given Romano is saying 4 years, could it be that Ornstein is saying it'll be a 4 year contract with the option of a 5th? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzle Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 1 minute ago, 54 said: I've not read the Ornstein article, but given Romano is saying 4 years, could it be that Ornstein is saying it'll be a 4 year contract with the option of a 5th? Only if Ormsteins tweet saying 5 plus an extra year to 2030 is wrong. Its on the previous page in Supertoons post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 4 minutes ago, 54 said: I've not read the Ornstein article, but given Romano is saying 4 years, could it be that Ornstein is saying it'll be a 4 year contract with the option of a 5th? Depends how you want to interpret. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 1 minute ago, Fezzle said: Only if Ormsteins tweet saying 5 plus an extra year to 2030 is wrong. Its on the previous page in Supertoons post Ah missed that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Romano probably heard 'Five year deal including add on', and rushed to tweet and interpreted it as 4+1. When it's actually 5+1. Tweet again shortly referencing Orny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checko Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 5+1 is a long deal for someone who's had a lot of injury issues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now