Ghandis Flip-Flop Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 Just now, TRon said: Anyone a bit surprised he's not been able to dislodge Burn from the CB position yet? He's a left sided CB from what I know so should be the logical cover for Botman. I know Burn has done well defensively, but we are really struggling to bring the ball out since Schar and Botman were sidelined and our football in general has suffered on that score. Not really, given the lack of Schar, I think Burn was in as much for his leadership and experience as ability. Kelly hasn’t been around the group long enough to have a similar influence yet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 Just now, RodneyCisse said: Isn’t that based around Burns leadership more than anything? No idea, but if Kelly can't get into the team when our two first choice CBs are out, not sure what that says about his role here. Unless Eddie just thinks he needs a long bedding in period. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 3 minutes ago, TRon said: Anyone a bit surprised he's not been able to dislodge Burn from the CB position yet? He's a left sided CB from what I know so should be the logical cover for Botman. I know Burn has done well defensively, but we are really struggling to bring the ball out since Schar and Botman were sidelined and our football in general has suffered on that score. Burn has played really well this season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upthemags Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 Burn starts at cb over Kelly because Burn is better at football than Kelly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 I just think he's been signed as a LB, which will make it a poor signing long term as he's a stupidly expensive wages back up LB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 27 minutes ago, Sibierski said: I just think he's been signed as a LB, which will make it a poor signing long term as he's a stupidly expensive wages back up LB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Sibierski said: I just think he's been signed as a LB, which will make it a poor signing long term as he's a stupidly expensive wages back up LB. I agree with this. That’s why there’s no such thing as a free transfer. Just look at Fraser scenario. Especially when you have Targett and Burn who can all play there. Will be an interesting watch to see if he can displace Burn never mind Botman. Edited September 15 by LFEE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazzy Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 31 minutes ago, Sibierski said: I just think he's been signed as a LB, which will make it a poor signing long term as he's a stupidly expensive wages back up LB. He's cover for multiple positions. An extremely valuable thing to have in any squad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 55 minutes ago, 54 said: Burn has played really well this season Is he bringing the ball out really well? I did specify that part of his game which I assumed Lloyd would be better at. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 Hooked at HT. Lumbered with him till end of this decade on £150k pw. The Howe legacy that will be on par with Issac Hayden Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 Looks a nothing player to me. Ok defensively. Ok on the ball. Ok in the air. Ok going forward. Passive as. Not to say he’s bad. Just not sure what high qualities he’s meant to have beyond versatility. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 Just now, The College Dropout said: Looks a nothing player to me. Ok defensively. Ok on the ball. Ok in the air. Ok going forward. Passive as. Not to say he’s bad. Just not sure what high qualities he’s meant to have beyond versatility. He can't get Burn out of the side atm, so I'm guessing he's not much of a CB at any rate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 16 minutes ago, Sibierski said: Hooked at HT. Lumbered with him till end of this decade on £150k pw. The Howe legacy that will be on par with Issac Hayden Loving the made-up salaries mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 Writing off players after 200 minutes, never change N-O. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 5 hours ago, The College Dropout said: Looks a nothing player to me. Ok defensively. Ok on the ball. Ok in the air. Ok going forward. Passive as. Not to say he’s bad. Just not sure what high qualities he’s meant to have beyond versatility. I couldn't agree more. Which shocks me as I've never ever agreed on any of your opinions, ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 picked him on a free so we hopefully could spend big elsewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 5 hours ago, TRon said: He can't get Burn out of the side atm, so I'm guessing he's not much of a CB at any rate. To be fair that's how Eddie works, notice Tonali not getting games etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonalis Bookie Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 4 hours ago, Pata said: Writing off players after 200 minutes, never change N-O. its not writing off when he is persistently allowing players onto their stronger foot, seeing goals conceded from his side, failing to organise the man infront of him, not create an impact going forward, looks a little shaky with the ball at his feet, doesnt tuck in tight enough when the ball is on the other side, lets crosses come in just because theyre on a weaker foot and looks very naive when it comes to making tackles that dont require contact. He does an adequate job at best. His deficiencies are all there to see. He shouldn't be ahead of Lascelles as backup CB and Hall / Tino should be LB dependant on Trippiers play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 Bit of a weird performance from K.I's visage. Didn't seem like he did much wrong but then we looked much better/coherent when Hall was on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonalis Bookie Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 dont forget Eddie signed this guy for 13m in 2019. In today's money thats about 30m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big River Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 1 minute ago, Tonalis Bookie said: dont forget Eddie signed this guy for 13m in 2019. In today's money thats about 30m go enjoy the rest of your weekend and stop being a prat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 Looks just fine for what we brought him in for, being a backup CB/LB. We needed more depth there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonalis Bookie Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 31 minutes ago, Big River said: go enjoy the rest of your weekend and stop being a prat Facts don’t care about your feelings Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 34 minutes ago, Tonalis Bookie said: dont forget Eddie signed this guy for 13m in 2019. In today's money thats about 30m Based on what? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now