The Prophet Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Fair play. Looks like they're looking to keep their best players and try and continue to challenge for European places too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Not bothered if true. This Bailey cunt knows nothing though. I don’t see them wanting less either tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Walk away Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy84 Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Aye non starter this one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Glad that Graeme Bailey has not been right about a single thing in his journalistic career. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 They might want to offer him a new contract if they value him that highly. He is apparently on 25,000 a week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 2 minutes ago, JT24 said: Glad that Graeme Bailey has not been right about a single thing in his journalistic career. The “journalist” has probably guessed right this time though. He wouldn’t know either way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checko Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Personally I find it ourageous that clubs don't want to sell us their best players cheaply. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 4 minutes ago, Andy84 said: Aye non starter this one Means jackshit tbh. Obviously they will quote a ridiculously high price to start with. We'll counter with a realistic fee which might get the deal done. A lot depends on if Elanga wants to be here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likelylad Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 3 hours ago, Checko said: Personally I find it ourageous that clubs don't want to sell us their best players cheaply. Clubs want a premium for their players. Which is understandable but in this PSR world. Most clubs need to box clever and can't really afford to splash the cash. All to protect the Sky 6. Hopefully City win their next APT case Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisMcQuillan Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 3 hours ago, Checko said: Personally I find it ourageous that clubs don't want to sell us their best players cheaply. I know this is tongue in cheek, but could easily be lifted from an Arsenal or Liverpool forum as a serious comment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 3 hours ago, Checko said: Personally I find it ourageous that clubs don't want to sell us their best players cheaply. hahhaa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 On 09/06/2025 at 05:31, Myleftboot said: Is he any good at football though. American flag football, almost certainly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebelrouser Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Would Elanga even unseat Murphy in his current form? I never liked the idea to begin with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 1 minute ago, rebelrouser said: Would Elanga even unseat Murphy in his current form? I never liked the idea to begin with. There aren't many players who would in current form. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 £60m seems about right given the season he's had a age. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebelrouser Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 1 minute ago, The Prophet said: There aren't many players who would in current form. Right. So let's get a left foot in for a different approach/options. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Never for £60m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 4 hours ago, The Prophet said: Oh no, this is devastating news. anyway… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonBez comesock Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Aye , Value £60m Pay him peanuts Need to give him £100k if they value him that much We are going to have to increase Isaks wage accordingly if we want him to stay No loyalty in football when that extra £££ is offered Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Crazy money when City have just paid 30 million for Cherki. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Puppets Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 23 minutes ago, Whitley mag said: Crazy money when City have just paid 30 million for Cherki. But they'll also be paying Cherki about £250,000 a week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen Posted June 10 Share Posted June 10 Fair enough asking price from Forest. We'd expect ourselves to do the same if a club came in for one of our best players. You can't really expect to pay a 'fair' price for a star player from a team that doesn't want/have to sell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now