andycap Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Could we play at gatesheads stadium? We could buy it aswell so gateshead have a home for life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago (edited) My guess is ground sharing isn't an option. PSR rules the waves so we can't take the dip. Not for 3-4 years. We've the Euros as well. It's a new ground and wether you want to move or not the new ground will be awesome. My guess, again, is Castle Leazes or Exhibition Park (opposite the North Terrace) We'll see. Edited 7 hours ago by Groundhog63 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, Chapo said: Tell the Freenonces to fuck off. Why? I’ve said from day one we’d help the club 🤷🏼♂️ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Aye, don’t see why we would hate the Freeman. Surely without them we would just have an urban mess of developed land, no public parks, and no hoppings, which actually enabled us to enter the competition we last won. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Fairly big development if conversations have taken place with Freemen, first real sign there seriously exploring the option. Makes perfect sense to move, a rebuild of St James just looks very complicated and don’t think there’s any viable option of playing anywhere else whilst work takes place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Where would be the most suitable option for us to ground share? Sunderland maybes cannot see there owners turning down the extra business. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Roughly 48 thousand seater isn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, andycap said: Roughly 48 thousand seater isn't it? I think the capacity now is 46,000 for some reason, maybe segregation now they have moved the away fans Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago It's the only option if majority of our fans wanna see the match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokerprince2004 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Could we not just build a temporary 48,000 stadium like they one they built for Qatar world cup from shipping containers. Not sure how long that took to build but you could build it anywhere local. Must be a better option then having to go to Sunderland 19 times a season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago The only other option is to build somewhere new and use St James's until it's finished. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chapo Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, LFEE said: Why? I’ve said from day one we’d help the club 🤷🏼♂️ My post was solely for your benefit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAK Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 45 minutes ago, andycap said: Where would be the most suitable option for us to ground share? Sunderland maybes cannot see there owners turning down the extra business. Doubt the police would want thousands of NUFC fans in Sunderland every other week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Absolutely zero chance we share with the mackems. Sunderland would be a war zone once a fortnight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 25 minutes ago, Pokerprince2004 said: Could we not just build a temporary 48,000 stadium like the one they built for Qatar world cup from shipping containers. Not sure how long that took to build but you could build it anywhere local. Must be a better option then having to go to Sunderland 19 times a season While all the stadium costs are confidential, it isn’t thought to have cost much less than a regular build of similar size. There is zero chance of PIF pouring hundreds of millions into a ground which would be used for a season, or two at most. Spending £250m and bringing in £70m isn’t even on the table. It is move or a small extension to SJP (if that is possible). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, SAK said: Doubt the police would want thousands of NUFC fans in Sunderland every other week. None of us would want to be there every other week, fucking awful place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Wherever they decide to temporarily play, I just hope it's most convenient for me if not it's a terrible decision by the club and especially Mitchell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, LFEE said: Why? I’ve said from day one we’d help the club 🤷🏼♂️ Is it true about the contact? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancrate1892 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, andycap said: Roughly 48 thousand seater isn't it? 47999, cos one is still covered in shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big River Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago has anyone suggesting the stadium of shite, ever been to the stadium of shite? it's fucking shite. not being dramatic but I'd rather kill myself than go there every other week Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Would our season ticket holders be fine with only getting to go to every other home game (at a reduced price obviously) for a season, if it meant SJP was getting a big upgrade? I kind of get the feeling that a lot would be quite upset about it, if it was to happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Isn't the whole point of Option C (Leazes Park), that it's phased construction so only the Leazes End would need to close? What do other clubs normally do when they're expanding and need to close a stand? Edited 4 hours ago by Kid Icarus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wandy Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) It would be a lot easier to get NUFC fans to the SoL than you might think. The stadium is on the opposite side of the river to the city centre, therefore the police could just barricade any access to the other side of the river where all of the bars and shops are. The stadium itself is an easy journey down the A19 and along Wessington Way, so straight in and straight out without fuss. This idea that the area would be a battleground is a total nonsense. The first few matches there might be a handful of wannabe hoolies but once the novelty wears off it would be a non event. Edited 3 hours ago by Wandy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Nobody said: Would our season ticket holders be fine with only getting to go to every other home game (at a reduced price obviously) for a season, if it meant SJP was getting a big upgrade? I kind of get the feeling that a lot would be quite upset about it, if it was to happen. If we go to a new stadium, we will get a load of backlash from season ticket holders who don’t want to move. The alternative however, is that they either pay £1,000-£1,500 for their season tickets, which they will kick off at, or they have their season tickets suspended whilst work at SJP is ongoing. There is also a possibility that they would be subjected to both. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: Isn't the whole point of Option C (Leazes Park), that it's phased construction so only the Leazes End would need to close? What do other clubs normally do when they're expanding and need to close a stand? It’s not really a realistic possibility though. We wouldn’t get away with building on that part of Leazes Park. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now