Bellars Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 whether luque is any good or not it's, obvious that he's not going to make it at nufc. get rid and cut the loss, it's time to move on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Probably would have been a good player for us had he been given a chance, but its too late for that now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Half the amount of energy and bandwith wasted on this forum is a direct result of Luque. (THe other half probably being Parker) Sell plz. tks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Great player. Keep. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 i'm not sure actually, i like Sibreski. It makes him sould swiss or austrian, which is good, because i don't like french people. Sibierski being your prototypical French-sounding name, of course prototypical - great word my friend, i think i'll try to use that more in conversation (i work on an oil rig mind so they might hang me for being a smartarse, but i'll take my chances) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alijmitchell Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 It's a toss up between him and Boumsong as to who is the biggest flop of NUFC history. I'd go with Luque. Marcelino? Viana? Tbh Luque is never going to make it here, and won't be given a chance to try. If we can get any money for him he can put himself out of his own misery and fuck off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 ONE good pass and 23 people say we should keep him, Jesus has run out of tears! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 GREAT thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 If we get a new manager in, keep. He's played what, five games? I think he should have until the next window to make an impact. If Roeder stays, go. He'll never get an extended run in the team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Really! this is the perfect example of kneejerk culture on this forum. Before the weekend it would have been 80/20 at best. One good pass and the forum is split Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Really! this is the perfect example of kneejerk culture on this forum. Before the weekend it would have been 80/20 at best. One good pass and the forum is split Even Gemmil has turned! Though it was one hell of a pass Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DarkSchneider Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Sack Roeder and keep Luque. Sell Duff and buy Baines Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Never got a decent chance to prove himself here,and it seems under Roeder he will never will,so selling him will be the right thing to do,unless of course Roeder is sacked in the summer,wich won't happend As above really - dont think he's ever had a fair chance under Roeder, and isn;t gonna get it - we may as well let the lad try and salvage his career and get a bit if cash for him, otherwise he'll go for nowt, and its another £10m doon the Shi**er!! I never got involved in the other Luque thread, but have felt sorry for him, Roeder publicly declared he was giving him chances, then when he got one, and scored (Palermo) he was subsquently dropped. That must have done his confidence the world of good! As others have said, he drops Luque, and publicly questions his attitude, but keeps playing the likes of Carr and Babayaro??!!!! MJ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 give him the last 4 games starting and see what he does........... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karjala Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 I know everyone has their own opinion on Albert Luque but i personally think we should keep him. I believe he clearly has the talent and ability. I know that he did get a brief chance in the first team and didnt really perform but i think if he was given another chance like starting him in the next and final 4 matches (nothing to lose anyway) of the season he would perform. Also if we sell him now we will get about £3 million for him which i think is ridiculous! mackems.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 give him the last 4 games starting and see what he does........... Andy Carroll mebbies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Milner on the left, Dyer on the right, Sibierski and Martins up front is what I'd expect to see now that Duff is injured and N'Zogbia is on the naughty step, waiting for his train to King's Cross. Carroll should/will also probably be involved ahead of Alberto after his weekend performance. For comedy value, and for another stick to beat Roeder with, I do hope Luque plays though - and that he's like the second-coming of Laurent Robert Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karjala Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 best player in Europe. End of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 best player in Europe. End of. Absolutely hilarious. Did you think that up all by yourself? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Luque Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 He's a great player, but we've destoryed him. I'd like to se him start at least 4 games in a row. He hasnt really ever been given a proper chance and if i'd been put on for the last 3 minutes of a game, i wouldnt be too happy either. oh, and look at shevchenko. He's been a massive flop, but he's been given a chance, and he's gradually becoming the player he once was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 He's still great on pro evo as the middle of a front three Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Sibierski being your prototypical French-sounding name, of course prototypical - great word my friend, i think i'll try to use that more in conversation (i work on an oil rig mind so they might hang me for being a smartarse, but i'll take my chances) Or alternatively you could try using the word "stereotypical" which is what Racunteur was actually looking for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Sack Roeder. Keep Luque (as player-manager). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raconteur Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Sibierski being your prototypical French-sounding name, of course prototypical - great word my friend, i think i'll try to use that more in conversation (i work on an oil rig mind so they might hang me for being a smartarse, but i'll take my chances) Or alternatively you could try using the word "stereotypical" which is what Racunteur was actually looking for. Or even archetypal - all three fit, and are good Queen's English... Just out of curiosity, was the manner in which you spelt my user name a typo, or do you have something to say? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Sibierski being your prototypical French-sounding name, of course prototypical - great word my friend, i think i'll try to use that more in conversation (i work on an oil rig mind so they might hang me for being a smartarse, but i'll take my chances) Or alternatively you could try using the word "stereotypical" which is what Racunteur was actually looking for. Or even archetypal - all three fit, and are good Queen's English... Just out of curiosity, was the manner in which you spelt my user name a typo, or do you have something to say? Shit!! Sorry mate! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now