ChezGiven Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 What the fuck! Headline screams that the deal is done and then you read it and it says it isn't done yet!!! Fuck off Oliver!!! You mean this bit "And all United could do was hope that if West Ham do move in for Anelka, it will not stop the Dyer deal going through." Should say 'would'. Thick twat doesnt even know how to use verbs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 £14m for Dyer and Parker? Amazing. THIS. Staggering. Thank God for Icelandic stupidity! Instead getting Geremi and Barton or Smith for around £6m 2 better players and £8M in on the bank for us ....Quality dealing by Sam and the rest involved :clap: :clap: If this comes off, definately. I was aghast when we pulled the plug on the Dyer thing at £6m. If we can get another mill for the little c***, i'll be over the moon! I genuinely thoguht Ashley had f***** that one up, but fair play to him and his team if it goes through at £7m - although the sickening feeling at thinking we were going to have to keep paying superstar wages to a very average player weren't nice. So was i when considering that no manager probably wants an unhappy player amon the squad. But if this deal goes through and Dyer completes his move to West Ham today or tomorrow, then looking at this afterwards then it really was good dealing from Ashley even if there was a risk that the whole deal would collapse. 1. We earned more money through Ashleys decision. 2. We dont just give away players because there's a bid on the table. Maybe this could send out a little message that Newcastle wont sell if they dont think the price is good enough.Before we have given away players just for the cause of it Even if it doesn't send out a message to other clubs it surely cant do any harm either. At least £1m earned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatcol Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 sorry if this has already been mentioned in this thread but apparantley the reason why the deal fell through in the first place was that Dyer's agent had demanded a £2M "loyalty" bonus from the club as Dyer hadn't put in a transfer request! Needless to say the board wern't happy about this and said to West Ham if you want him you pay it in the same way we did with Joey Barton. Funny how the new deal appears to be £7M with a further £1M after appearances, it would be interesting to see if the extra money is going to the player, who after all deserves it! Plus if he'ed stayed till the end of his current contract he would be due a testomonial! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Fuck him now, anyway. We got more than he was worth, and i'm not expecting him to trouble us when we play West Ham. Although those who saw the £2m thing as being down West Ham's poor practices might want to reassess it bearing in mind the "loyalty payment" thing. But at the end of the day, we got GOOD money for an average payer, so kudos to us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzzieMandias Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The "loyalty payment thing" is a rumour for which there hasn't been the slightest shred of confirmation in any published story. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatcol Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The loyalty bonus was the reason Mort was so upset with Magnus Magnusson spouting off that we were the ones to blame when it was the players agent... Anyway totally agree best shot of him, plus we got a cracking deal. Be interesting to see how many games he plays for West Ham though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 With this deal, Big Mike Ashley has put down his marker and served notice that there's a new chief in toon. West Ham and their mouthpiece Alan Oliver have been slapped hard around the jowels and both have been left reeling. Big Mike I salute you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Dyer stands in the centre circle with his hands on his hips, West Ham would have been better of spending 7 mil on Michael Flatley from River dance. At least ha can dance with his hands on his hips http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOoPUlObPs4 Edit : notice they are doing the Dyer step over dance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The "loyalty payment thing" is a rumour for which there hasn't been the slightest shred of confirmation in any published story. Which puts it at EXACTLY the same level of believability as the "West Ham shady practices shown in this transfer" thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Pleased he'll be away before he's due a testamonial, that would just be embarrassing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatcol Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The "loyalty payment thing" is a rumour for which there hasn't been the slightest shred of confirmation in any published story. Nor will there be it's just a rumour from various sources but it certainly makes sense. I'm just pleased he's off and the last of the joung guns crowd who brought us down with the antics, behaviour and lack of any consistant perfomance on the pitch. The new set up need applauding. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 http://www.nufc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10278~1093273,00.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Aye, Parker, Bowyer and Dyer - thats a midfield guaranteed to produce fuck all except laughs for other teams fans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The "loyalty payment thing" is a rumour for which there hasn't been the slightest shred of confirmation in any published story. It's absolute bollocks, man. For sure. West Ham acted the bollocks during the deal and Mort and Ashley demanded more money out of them because of it. It's done, we won. The board did the right thing and we're £2M better off. Huzzah. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Aye, Parker, Bowyer and Dyer - thats a midfield guaranteed to produce f*** all except laughs for other teams fans. All they need is Jenas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The "loyalty payment thing" is a rumour for which there hasn't been the slightest shred of confirmation in any published story. It's absolute bollocks, man. For sure. West Ham acted the bollocks during the deal and Mort and Ashley demanded more money out of them because of it. It's done, we won. The board did the right thing and we're £2M better off. Huzzah. Denyong one unsubstantiated story, then claiming another is true. Ouch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The combined fee we've received for Dyer and Parker is amazing. Two players that weren't really performing sold for £14m... great business. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The "loyalty payment thing" is a rumour for which there hasn't been the slightest shred of confirmation in any published story. The one that has made the most sense though. The other rumour was the one about Ashley over-hearing the West Ham lot boasting about the deal in a casino. No, after all the PR from Dyer's agents this summer and the stories about his family (all placed in the press by Dyer remember, these facts dont come out of random questions at interviews on other subjects), everything points to him and his agent engineering a move away and trying to get a loyalty payment at the same time. Maybe West Ham also tapped him up but were expecting us to pay the loyalty fee out of the £6m? That would be taking the piss and could explain the comments from Mort. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WalkervilleMag Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 just like to say YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Seriously, thank Christ, his father and his mate Allah that the deal has gone through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Boa Morte Parker Bowyer Dyer Hahaha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The "loyalty payment thing" is a rumour for which there hasn't been the slightest shred of confirmation in any published story. It's absolute bollocks, man. For sure. West Ham acted the bollocks during the deal and Mort and Ashley demanded more money out of them because of it. It's done, we won. The board did the right thing and we're £2M better off. Huzzah. Denyong one unsubstantiated story, then claiming another is true. Ouch. Aye, the truth will come out some day - hopefully soon - and you'll see that's not what I'm doing at all. Have some faith in things, man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Aye, Parker, Bowyer and Dyer - thats a midfield guaranteed to produce f*** all except laughs for other teams fans. All they need is Jenas They'd be the match for ANY team then.....as long as the aim of the competition was to run with the ball for a bit (bonus points for sideways), pass the ball badly, fail to provide goalscoring opportunities, and be massively overpaid. In fact, if they could get Zakora as backup, they'd be crowned champions now! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzzieMandias Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The "loyalty payment thing" is a rumour for which there hasn't been the slightest shred of confirmation in any published story. Which puts it at EXACTLY the same level of believability as the "West Ham shady practices shown in this transfer" thing. I'm afraid you're wrong. There have been precisely no mentions of a loyalty bonus by anyone at either club. The "West Ham shady practices thing" has been asserted by us and nothing has been denied by them. And who could forget that their "shady practices thing" nearly got them relegated last season. Just in the last few days, Derby have also complained about dodgy West Ham approaches to one of their players. Meanwhile, the Joey Barton "loyalty bonus thing" came out into the open as fact. If it did in that case, why not in this one? But, feel free to believe that West Ham are pure as the driven and Mort and Allardyce are liars, if that what makes you happy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Just pleased he's now off the wage bill. Getting £8m for him is just insane but it's us on the right end of it for a change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now