thomas

Not too far fetched to say that if that goal ran for president it would be elected in a landslide.

gouffran literally dropping a face there, warranted. get in

Well shit!

fuck off colback

pfm benitez in starting jack "tough man" colback away shocker. wake up sheeple. for real though that lineup is underwhelming at best

Or not, as QPR have taken the lead and so far have a goal difference better than us, it would take a win by 3 goals for us to go above them as it stands. BBC have us both on +4 GD? http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/avs/avatar_9365_1357950390.png

Kind of hate pep so can't cheer but entertaining game at least.

zlatan we know you love the half volley but give it a rest for a minute

fairly fucking amazing like

Well, one would be an opinion backed up by years of evidence, the other would be an opinion backed up by one game. Spot the differene.

Cause it's ... hard work? What the ... Are they known to be sweaty? The full saying is "sweating like a rapist in a police line up" Cheers. Literally never heard that before.

Cause it's ... hard work? What the ... Are they known to be sweaty?

Probably just worded horribly but intended to mean it was not a flat 30m upfront figure. I'm guessing it's something like we receive the full £30m if he stays there all 5 years; if he's sold on, we receive x% of the deal or some fixed figure, whichever is higher. Basically just that there are clauses and conditions where we could conceivably receive less or more than the full 30 million. If Spurs have agreed £30 million with us they will pay £30 million. If he gets injured and retires after one game we get £30 million. We would have to agree to any future discount on the amount they owe but why would we do that. To get the deal done and get him out? "look, 6m a year for 5 years. if he doesn't stay the full five you get [amount calculated by formula] as a final payment" I don't know if the article is even legit or not but prices are not as concrete as you make them seem with statements like "If Spurs have agreed £30 million with us they will pay £30 million." Yeah that's the number spouted by press but everything is subject to this, that and the other clauses with contracts.

Probably just worded horribly but intended to mean it was not a flat 30m upfront figure. I'm guessing it's something like we receive the full £30m if he stays there all 5 years; if he's sold on, we receive x% of the deal or some fixed figure, whichever is higher. Basically just that there are clauses and conditions where we could conceivably receive less or more than the full 30 million.

In fairness, people making Brian Adams references deserve what they get.

I might legitimately die laughing

get over pardew first, hypocrite :p

Nope. I don't like it one bit. edit: just a general statement, not answering ^^^^^^ timing.

a finnish goalkeeper for the future. not where we need to be strengthening, charnley/carr/rafa oot.

So the surname fits.

Well from the last page. new page wanker that I am. Aye (5 out), Nah (3-4 in....2 in at most IMO).

Just kind of hit me how insane the complete squad overhaul has already been just up until now. Another 3/4 out/in would be beyond the pale.

walk over to messi and apologize you racist zombie

Likewise I don't see the need to become so positive about him because he's rattled the crossbar and then skyed two other chances. At least in my case the negativity is more of a reaction to the unfounded hopes he's going to accomplish anything, rather than just being mean for the sake of it.