Erm, no.
Did you just not read the first part of the sentence of mine you referenced, then? Where I said he should obviously save it?
You insinuated that people were saying he wasn't at fault for the goal, which is entirely false and a bit bizarre, but tbh does ties-in with your apparent inability to read.
No, you read my posts again - you will not find anything directed at you saying or implying whether he should have saved it or not. Only that your excuses for him were crap.
I read the posts last night but I only replied this morning as I was in hurry; so this likely to have played a part in distorting my memory about the consensus on here. In any case, reading it back again, you're right, no one was saying that it wasn't his fault. So I accept that I was wrong here.