Jump to content

Teasy

Member
  • Posts

    12,131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Teasy

  1. Doesn't have to put them all on the fucking pitch though!
  2. Why did they give the ball back? The palace player didn't put the ball out of play deliberately, he tried to flick it on and fucked up..
  3. The entire separation thing was nonsense. They wouldn't dare to ban any team, the whole ODT is a pretence.
  4. SNP is where I stopped reading..
  5. Teasy

    David Squires

    Amazing anyone expected anything different from a Guardian cartoonist.
  6. You know the replies here really are funny. Anyone who even suggests anything that doesn't fit with your ideas isnt engaged with, just dismissed. You's lot really haven't got a clue Not wasting my time though. Bye..
  7. No I'd rather just support the genuine cause of kick it out. This isn't the thread for a discussion on it so I won't continue it here. Felt I had to comment once to the poster that brought it up.
  8. Nope, support "kick it out", not the BLM kneeling nonsense IMO.
  9. Thought that article was shite, but each to there own.
  10. Pretty sure I've never wanked over anyone involved in NUFC before, this really is a new world.
  11. Hmm, could I fit "His Excellency Yasir Al-Rumayyan" on the back of a shirt?
  12. They have the legal power to disqualify any club after reviewing its directors every season, but they don't and never will, because it would ruin their competition. Fact is once you're in, you're in.
  13. How thick are the Guardian? PIF would have been giving those assurances the entire time. If this is true then it's obviously just a way for the PL to climb down without saying its because of the change in piracy. "let's just say you've given up new assurances we never got before and now we're happy". Suppose I could be generous and say that the Guardian are being willfuly ignorant to put out a exclusive angle on the takeover.
  14. Ah shit, so we'd only go from a slow death of a club spending less then nowt to one that is forced to limit itself to financial fair play levels of spending?.. We'll that's me right back down to earth ?
  15. Again though I'm not saying this will go through, because I refuse to do that to myself again. For this to happen the consortium still have to agree to the full price and Ashley has to agree to play nice with the PL. Otherwise the PL will keep being stubborn just to guard against liability. EDIT yeah I agree Jackie Broon
  16. They can change their mind, whether they will is the question. Admitting liability isn't required if the PL and the new owners/Ashley reach a agreement for everyone to move forward happily.
  17. Pretty sure the rules leave it entirely up to the PL to decide who should be named as a director (with the caveat that it can be contested obviously). So the PL can just say its changed its mind.
  18. Didn't disagree with your point, was just saying its a critical theory so doesn't require actual unethical behaviour. I'm backing up your point and like I said I agree, was just saying the theory is nonsense just like all critical theory.
  19. Anyway, do we really have to get political on such a happy day just before it all crashes around our ears? Either the takeover will collapse again or its world war 3, lets face facts here we don't get nice things
  20. At least we're still better than Labour, although maybe not since the Saudi's are in agreement with Labour on womens rights.
  21. I agree, also under the theory of the quote you posted we could be taken over by the baby Jesus and it wouldn't matter, still unethical because it happened in a capitalist society apparently...
  22. I don't want to get too positive because it feels like it'll just go to shit again since its happened so many times. But what I would say is I think in the past there were always two sides in the media. Even when one group had clearly been briefed positively that something was happening soon there was always the other side still saying not being positive, or even actively negative. Likely because one side was being briefed by the consortium and the other by the Premier League. It seems like right now the news is universal. Which suggests both sides are briefing from the same position. Hate even posting positive stuff in case it jinxes things, which just shows how insane this has all sent me... (now I'm off to touch wood, and if the takeover goes through touch some more wood).
×
×
  • Create New...