dcmk

What a complete load of s****. How exactly?

Dreamy

After he hit the post first half.

Martins you beautyyyyy!

Butt just stop those balls over the top

shut up

where was the cross ffs

FUCKKK

That has to be the worst retaliation from any fan group in any sport at any time in history. LOL is all I have to say. Just... L O L Why do we believe this? Has anyone seen this campaign? or have we started to believe everything we read again - when it suits us.

I think he is gone in the summer, surely the main reason he came over from Spain would be because he is being paid more. If that's the case I think they would offload him.

Butt is absolutely woeful, pissed me off no end when Kinnear said a while back "for me he's brilliant" and what pisses me off even more is that the f***ing media think he's our best player and we love him. He is the only midfielder who can break up opposition play, he still does this pretty well imo, just the other aspects of his game and his psychical attributes that have gone to cack. Needs replacing in summer but i can see why he is played tbh. I agree with you about the media, never understood that, has been going on the whole time he has been here too.

jesus.

In all honesty i can see you going nuts if he said anything bad about Messi or Barcelona In all honesty I could see you going nuts if he said anything bad about me, you seem to be a fan.. Nope, funny how you got that impression... but saying that you are wrong very often on here.

In all honesty i can see you going nuts if he said anything bad about Messi or Barcelona

I thought people didn't give a shit what people say about the club and fans. Plus if you do why does a guy saying a single derogatory sentence piss you off so much

absolutely, and fair play to chelsea for being the first team to stop them scoring at home this season as i said before i prefer the way the italians and spanish go about defending when that's their gameplan but yeah, fair play to chelsea for that still missing how Barca's defence is so bad and chelsea didn't punish it though Seriously explained this like 5+ times now! Read them. oh no, i read 'em, it paraphrases to "they didn't try because they didn't have to" bollocks, and it doesn't explain the first leg or were they not trying then either at 0-0? Why is that bollocks? if your manager of Chelsea you know the opposition going to throw everything forward, you would like to see open game? Instead of hitting them on the break when they are over exposed ala Man Utd on Tuesday? Why exactly is it bollocks. i agree with what you're saying about the tactical aspect, i.e. don't play on an open game - counter attack definately the way what i'm saying is if barca's defence is/was so bad as you've suggested why didn't a counter attacking game expose this in the way arsenals defence was exposed by man u? (not that man u played counter attack but you see what i mean) i mean in your first line you're basically saying tactically hiddink tacitly accepted barca would beat them in an open game so even in the home leg he set up to stifle them and counter, yet you're calling barca's attack toothless!! i see this as a massive contradiction in terms and it's why we've been slavering on for hours now I said hiddink paid to much respect to them at the nou camp. Today Barca's attack were completely toothless, i mean chasing the game for 80 minutes your one shot on target is the very last. 70% possession and one shot on target. With Eto'o, Messi, Iniesta all these players they are supposed to steamroll through teams and they come up against a good defense and they are completely out of ideas. Especially in the dire situation they were in.

absolutely, and fair play to chelsea for being the first team to stop them scoring at home this season as i said before i prefer the way the italians and spanish go about defending when that's their gameplan but yeah, fair play to chelsea for that still missing how Barca's defence is so bad and chelsea didn't punish it though Seriously explained this like 5+ times now! Read them. oh no, i read 'em, it paraphrases to "they didn't try because they didn't have to" bollocks, and it doesn't explain the first leg or were they not trying then either at 0-0? Why is that bollocks? if your manager of Chelsea you know the opposition going to throw everything forward, you would like to see open game? Instead of hitting them on the break when they are over exposed ala Man Utd on Tuesday? Why exactly is it bollocks.

absolutely, and fair play to chelsea for being the first team to stop them scoring at home this season as i said before i prefer the way the italians and spanish go about defending when that's their gameplan but yeah, fair play to chelsea for that still missing how Barca's defence is so bad and chelsea didn't punish it though Seriously explained this like 5+ times now! Read them.

but they didn't, it's as simple as that! the stats support it, possession and othewise as much as like this barca team i'm aware ANY team can play badly and/or not perform because they're not robots and Barca's defence is so bad chelsea breached it once in 2 legs and they didn't have the balls to play them in either game 'cause they know they'd have been played off the park, that's how simple it is Barcas has always been vulnerable, Marquez gifted Drogba the ball first leg, and wtf was with them playing handball tonight to clear the ball. I have seen Barca a fair bit this year, the goals they concede are so pathetic. When your 1-0 at home, away goals count double, team is going to attack and throw every one forward. Perfect for countering, but i suppose an open game is what they should of done tonight right?

trying to be condescending good stuff chelsea tried to defend their way through a tie against the best attacking team in Europe and they lost so you're crying about the ref and ignoring the ref doing Barca in the first leg when they were totally dominant, a goal which would have forced chelsea out at stamford bridge then barca would have buried them barca didn't cry about the denied penalty, they struggled through a difficult game last night and won it at the death what's so difficult to understand about that? Ye they 'would' of buried them, nothing like speculation is there. I would rather see what was in front of me, a team who didnt need to attack would happily counter attack, as Barcelona are shite defensive. Was the plan in Nou Camp too, i can't remember the penalty appeal exactly im sure it wasn't as obvious as the ones - notice its not singular - today. Royally screwed today, and they were the better team tonight. With your Juve and AC Milan example earlier you must appreciate the art of defending.

was gonna chomp but this is surely a piss take I hate this Barcelona w***-fest, was a complete farce today. They were completely toothless in attack, all these great players and one shot on goal and barely a sniff at their home ground. I thought there superb passing moves can tear apart anything.. obviously not. Over-rated. Surely a Man Utd win. You obviously haven't watched them this season then? actually i've just noticed this bit in bold :lol: :lol: dude has been arguing with me for an hour that they tactically contained a team who are "toothless" in attack priceless ye and you would argue that one shot on goal, chasing the game for 80 minutes is good priceless aye, not as good as the team who've scored the most goals overall in europe and the CL being toothless in attack You say that but they scored 1 goal from there one shot on target today when they were chasing the game for 80 minutes lol. No defense there really is there, my toothless comment was pretty fitting on yesterdays performance. probably the crux of the argument here - i understand that no matter how good an attack is if the oppositions primary goal is to stop them playing then even the greatest will struggle happens year on year in football, remember when man utd beat us at SJP the title season that wasn't? similar stuff you appear to believe that because people are waxing lyrical about barca's attack they should just be able to do whatever they want when they want this isn't football manager or PES dude Ye your the one going on and on and on about Barcelona's attack saying Chelsea didn't want to take them on. When in fact they got an early goal, and knew going over commit men. They have a suspect defense (which can't believe argued against!) and it was the right gameplan to counter them. Your just so pro Spanish football you can't accept that, when i think its common sense.

Why take the fight to Barcelona when you have the lead? When you know they are going to attack you and over commit too many men forward. How many times do i have to repeat myself. Can't you understand that, it's so simple. Ye well that was then this is now, one shot on target for the 'best attacking team in Europe' when chasing the game for 80 minutes. That's pretty inspiring.

Has signed for Flamengo.