Jump to content

dcmk

Member
  • Posts

    3,434
  • Joined

Everything posted by dcmk

  1. What? That post is idiotic. Rooney 10 shots to 1 goal, thats terrible. I suppose you think stats are rubbish when you look at something like 14 goals in 38 games for example. owen's goal record in the league this season is going to be something like 7 goals in 30 games, that's a shocking statitistic and look at the teams he's scored against He has score 10 or 11, and dont think he has played 30 games for us this year. How many were sub appearances. I been proving to you, with stats, links everything. Given a chance will put it away more than most in the league, proved that with the supposedly 'light years ahead with finishing' van Persie/Adebayor records for the year. What are you arguing? Put Micheal Owen in a team create chances for him - he aint had many. He has had 50, van Persie 180 shots. I love your passion dude but it's badly misplaced. You will find that in general the best strikers and goal scorers take a hell of a lot of shots and miss a hell of a lot also but ultimately score the most. If Owen started every game for Man Utd this year, would he be amongst the top goal scorers?
  2. What? That post is idiotic. Rooney 10 shots to 1 goal, thats terrible. I suppose you think stats are rubbish when you look at something like 14 goals in 38 games for example. owen's goal record in the league this season is going to be something like 7 goals in 30 games, that's a shocking statitistic and look at the teams he's scored against He has score 10 or 11, and dont think he has played 30 games for us this year. How many were sub appearances. I been proving to you, with stats, links everything. Given a chance will put it away more than most in the league, proved that with the supposedly 'light years ahead with finishing' van Persie/Adebayor records for the year. What are you arguing? Put Micheal Owen in a team create chances for him - he aint had many. He has had 50, van Persie 180 shots. I love your passion dude but it's badly misplaced. You will find that in general the best strikers and goal scorers take a hell of a lot of shots and miss a hell of a lot also but ultimately score the most. FFS it all started with you! You said Arsenal dont need someone like Owen in the side, when in fact they dont have a striker in the 6 yard box, they miss a fuckload of chances, they draw 0-0 when dominate games soo many times recent seasons, have lost games they dominated. Then you said outright lie that van Persie, Adebayor, BENDTNER, DIABY was more clinical as a striker. When proving they miss a "HELL OF A LOT" (your words) and Owen does in fact score more from LESS chances he gets. You try to shift it onto general play. I was only arguing about the word you used 'finishing'. Owen finishes more chances. Fact.
  3. What? That post is idiotic. Rooney 10 shots to 1 goal, thats terrible. I suppose you think stats are rubbish when you look at something like 14 goals in 38 games for example. owen's goal record in the league this season is going to be something like 7 goals in 30 games, that's a shocking statitistic and look at the teams he's scored against He has score 10 or 11, and dont think he has played 30 games for us this year. How many were sub appearances. I been proving to you, with stats, links everything. Given a chance will put it away more than most in the league, proved that with the supposedly 'light years ahead with finishing' van Persie/Adebayor records for the year. What are you arguing? Put Micheal Owen in a team create chances for him - he aint had many. He has had 50, van Persie 180 shots. no, we talking league goals and that number is 7 from open play, (penalty's not included) Talking league goals, ok from what i counted in league games this year had 26 shots in total. What is wrong with that? Pretty good asking me.
  4. In this whole league, just think about every team in this league right, even the very worst of them ... is there any striker who is so reliant on service that he never ever even has an attempt on goal unless he is handed a chance in the box? The current Owen is a dinosaur of the game. rooney does miss a lot of chances, but he's makes s*** loads of goals though for his team m8's and it's his influence on the team the fact is owen, hasn't even been getting chances as he can't make them for himself or can't get in the positions as he's soo slow I wasnt argueing this point. Look at how the discussion started.
  5. What? That post is idiotic. Rooney 10 shots to 1 goal, thats terrible. I suppose you think stats are rubbish when you look at something like 14 goals in 38 games for example. owen's goal record in the league this season is going to be something like 7 goals in 30 games, that's a shocking statitistic and look at the teams he's scored against He has score 10 or 11, and dont think he has played 30 games for us this year. How many were sub appearances. I been proving to you, with stats, links everything. Given a chance will put it away more than most in the league, proved that with the supposedly 'light years ahead with finishing' van Persie/Adebayor records for the year. What are you arguing? Put Micheal Owen in a team create chances for him - he aint had many. He has had 50, van Persie 180 shots.
  6. He only had 1 shot in all the games he has played against them this year. Played against them 4 times. Cant score if dont get chances. TBH good strikers carve chances for themselves, shearer played with some s**** at this club and still maintained an excellent goal scoring record against the big 4 I was never talking about creating chances for him or others. Was ALWAYS about how clinical he was. I never denied he has alot to his game, but when people speak s*** and outright lie, feel as though have to be called up on it. Its the theme throughout the board exaggerate the shitness of our players ie Jonas now. Included England and its fair as proves relies on service. he hasn't played for england this season erm hang on i don't think he did as he's never scored under capello I posted the link somewhere had all 2008/2009 fixtures.
  7. What? That post is idiotic. Rooney over 10 shots to 1 goal, thats terrible. I suppose you think stats are rubbish when you look at something like 14 goals in 38 games for example.
  8. He only had 1 shot in all the games he has played against them this year. Played against them 4 times. Cant score if dont get chances. TBH good strikers carve chances for themselves, shearer played with some s**** at this club and still maintained an excellent goal scoring record against the big 4 I was never talking about creating chances for him or others. Was ALWAYS about how clinical he was. I never denied he has alot to his game, but when people speak s*** and outright lie, feel as though have to be called up on it. Its the theme throughout the board exaggerate the shitness of our players ie Jonas now. Included England and its fair as proves relies on service. he hasn't played for england this season erm hang on
  9. Included England and its fair as proves relies on service.
  10. He only had 1 shot in all the games he has played against them this year. Played against them 4 times. Cant score if dont get chances. TBH good strikers carve chances for themselves, shearer played with some s**** at this club and still maintained an excellent goal scoring record against the big 4 I was never talking about creating chances for him or others. Was ALWAYS about how clinical he was. I never denied he has alot to his game, but when people speak shit and outright lie, feel as though have to be called up on it. Its the theme throughout the board exaggerate the shitness of our players ie Jonas now.
  11. I just proved to you, that your argument was s**** .. and that Owen is a clinical striker. You denying that is quite laughable, really. you said he was a 1 in 2 striker, but he's had 51 chances thats more than 1 in 4 so that's the arguement of that done 1 goal in 2 game striker. I didnt think that such a hard thing to understand. Also every 2 shots on goal he scores one, so for that too. Scored 14 goals from 51 total shots, i think that was right. Compare that to my post on van Persie 180(?) to 27 and Adebayor (cant remember) all above.. check. your argument is flaud, many strikers can have a 1 in 2 goal record across or season, but owen is only as good as his last game, keven davies has a good goal record this season, should arsenal sign him? f*** they would his form is 1 goal in 15 matches, and he's hardly looked liked scoring. Thats just a player now that is totally past it How is it flawed, when it spans across his club career and international career. Your as your last game ok, well if he had 3 chances on target or off in the last game, on history he would score 1. That is not past it. Look at Adebayors ratio. Give you a hint .. its worse. He past it?
  12. If its that easy, you become a pro footballer. Who one of the EPL greatest strikers. I feel like NE5 in regards to this, good fun. Oh I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that you weren't allowed to slag off any of the players unless you were actually a better footballer than them Stop trolling and f*** off back to your hole please. I'm just going to stop biting before s*** hits the fan again. You said he was shite for doing something anyone can do, werent you. repeat myself... idiot.
  13. He only had 1 shot in all the games he has played against them this year. Played against them 4 times. Cant score if dont get chances. TBH
  14. If its that easy, you become a pro footballer. Who one of the EPL greatest strikers. I feel like NE5 in regards to this, good fun.
  15. I just proved to you, that your argument was s**** .. and that Owen is a clinical striker. You denying that is quite laughable, really. you said he was a 1 in 2 striker, but he's had 51 chances thats more than 1 in 4 so that's the arguement of that done 1 goal in 2 game striker. I didnt think that such a hard thing to understand. Also every 2 shots on goal he scores one, so for that too. Scored 14 goals from 51 total shots, i think that was right. Compare that to my post on van Persie 180(?) to 27 and Adebayor (cant remember) all above.. check.
  16. Swap him for any of Arshavin, Adebayor or van Persie without question. They create and score chances, be more important to the team. So why on Earth would Wenger show any hint of interest in our grubby, pass it's sell by date striker? Owen is too one dimensional and too slow he wouldn't be able to keep up with those kids at Arsenal. Those Arsenal kids are the future of the game. Young, fresh, exciting and sexy football. Owen would be so out of place. He would be the guy no one wants to sit next to at lunch. Because he scores goals in less attempts??
  17. I just proved to you, that your argument was shite .. and that Owen is a clinical striker. You denying that is quite laughable, really.
  18. Ok i BET i can go to any forum of the top 4 and will get a fair amount of people who will say yes they would. Certainly wouldn't get laughed at. After all isnt he amongst one of the all time greatest strikers in the league?? England national team? Just a shame in crap team.
  19. Whole career suggests so. Daft idea huh? No, not really. 90% of the work Owen does (or used to do) in order to score is down to anticipation, movement and positioning. Mix that with the pace, acceleration and vigour he once had and it is a recipe for goals. His actual finishing was never anything more than average. Now that his legs have gone he has no pace and no power in his shots, so finds it more difficult to get scoring opportunities and more difficult to convert them into goals. Someone like Fowler at his peak could score different kinds of goals from difficult chances, while someone like Shearer was just so powerful and accurate that the goal usually flew in. Owen lacks the guile, touch and invention that Fowler had, and the placement and power that Shearer had. He is an instinctive finisher who relies on other parts of his game and other players to provide chances, nothing more. In terms of pure finishing RVP and Arshavin are absolutely light-years ahead of him, the only reason they don't score so many is because there is far more to their game and they spend much more time in other areas of the pitch, arshavin in particular plays as much as a winger as he does a striker. Eduardo's finishing is also better and his international goal scoring record for croatia is better than owen's for england. Ok argue that then, like 3rd time posted it. How are they light years now? Because he never attempts any kind of shot that isnt put on a plate for him? i dont know about your stats but from what i can find this season he has 8 goals and 34 shots, Martins in comparison has had 68 shots, literally twice as many, because he is more likely fashion chances for himself and more likely to take speculative shots. The fact owen has attempted to score so few times is the damning statistic here. including England which is fair. As proves he needs service. http://soccernet.espn.go.com/players/gamelog?id=7930&cc=5739
  20. Whole career suggests so. Daft idea huh? No, not really. 90% of the work Owen does (or used to do) in order to score is down to anticipation, movement and positioning. Mix that with the pace, acceleration and vigour he once had and it is a recipe for goals. His actual finishing was never anything more than average. Now that his legs have gone he has no pace and no power in his shots, so finds it more difficult to get scoring opportunities and more difficult to convert them into goals. Someone like Fowler at his peak could score different kinds of goals from difficult chances, while someone like Shearer was just so powerful and accurate that the goal usually flew in. Owen lacks the guile, touch and invention that Fowler had, and the placement and power that Shearer had. He is an instinctive finisher who relies on other parts of his game and other players to provide chances, nothing more. In terms of pure finishing RVP and Arshavin are absolutely light-years ahead of him, the only reason they don't score so many is because there is far more to their game and they spend much more time in other areas of the pitch, arshavin in particular plays as much as a winger as he does a striker. Eduardo's finishing is also better and his international goal scoring record for croatia is better than owen's for england. Ok argue that then, like 3rd time posted it. How are they light years now? i would like to see how many of target he has because i remember him missing at least 10 chances between the 2 hull cup games he's finished, got no pace, s*** captain, offers nothing to the team and is a midget 1 goal in 16, thats a hell lot worse than shola He took 51 total shots this year.
  21. he can create 1/2 of his own chances, remember owen cannot create anything for himself We was arguing about Owen being a good addition to Arsenal, as they try walk it into the net and dont have a type of striker like him. Around the 6 yard box, tucking chances in.
  22. van Persie - 178 shots. 67 on target. 27 goals. Thats pretty impressive. I could go on but getting depressing. Idiot
  23. Adebayor - 100 shots. 35 on target. 21 goals. A goal every 5 shots. CLINICAL.
  24. I'd say a striker who contributes absolutely nothing anywhere else on the pitch and can only put away 1/2 clear cut chances is exceptionally poor. Arshavin has 39/46 by the way. Adebayor has 30/35. I stopped checking after that because this was obviously going to get depressing. Hmm... I seem to be forgetting something. Oh yes. IDIOT Ok now check the amount of shots they take. In total. Owens is like 50.. they are double i bet. I aint checked by the way.
  25. Whole career suggests so. Daft idea huh? No, not really. 90% of the work Owen does (or used to do) in order to score is down to anticipation, movement and positioning. Mix that with the pace, acceleration and vigour he once had and it is a recipe for goals. His actual finishing was never anything more than average. Now that his legs have gone he has no pace and no power in his shots, so finds it more difficult to get scoring opportunities and more difficult to convert them into goals. Someone like Fowler at his peak could score different kinds of goals from difficult chances, while someone like Shearer was just so powerful and accurate that the goal usually flew in. Owen lacks the guile, touch and invention that Fowler had, and the placement and power that Shearer had. He is an instinctive finisher who relies on other parts of his game and other players to provide chances, nothing more. In terms of pure finishing RVP and Arshavin are absolutely light-years ahead of him, the only reason they don't score so many is because there is far more to their game and they spend much more time in other areas of the pitch, arshavin in particular plays as much as a winger as he does a striker. Eduardo's finishing is also better and his international goal scoring record for croatia is better than owen's for england. Ok argue that then, like 3rd time posted it. How are they light years now?
×
×
  • Create New...