It's interesting how people see games differently. I thought we allowed Swansea to settle into the game in the first half by not really closing them down. They didn't look like doing much until the 45th minute but we had allowed them to play it their way. Of course we looked dangerous at times on the counter (the save from Remy's header was awesome tbh). But they've got lots of patience and are quite happy pushing it around. I would much rather we had tried to unsettle them from the start by pressing more. Second half was much more open, we did get at them but the second goal killed us off. That goal was a bit fortunate and tbh we had some decent shouts for a penalty and one in particular looked nailed on. But I didn't particularly think we deserved much from the game, 3-0 seemed a harsh scoreline though.
I'm with Quayside. Thought we were abysmal first half - and them not creating clear cut chances was more by luck than judgement on our part. They had some decent movement 'between the lines' but we lacked energy, the formation was wrong and we were second to everything. Second half (until the last knockings) we had a real 'good go' and looked energised. Obvs the game opened up - to our cost - but at least we looked arsed