Nobody

Good first 35 minutes, terrible final 10. Hope we can gain some momentum in the second half again and get a goal in. Faye's been incredible, no one is getting past him.

I don't think Man U would be better off with another £80m to spend minus Ronaldo. Where would they put that money? They'd need a new RW, but that's about it really, except perhaps for back-up players. So, who'd they spend that cash on to make them a better team? Messi? Couldn't agree more, why fix something that isn't broken. But its not a case of "why fix something that isn't broken" - i'm sure Man U don't wonna sell him, and Fergie doesn't want the £80m, BUT if Ronaldo decides he's away, they'll have no option but to fix the fucker. Which you claim is possible, how can Manchester United replace Cristiano Ronaldo with a replacement who is capable of scoring/assisting the amount of goals he does? As Towelie said, even with 60m you couldn't do that unless you bought someone of similar ability like Messi for e.g What are the chance of that happening? Your comment was about not fixing it if it aint broken. If Ronaldo wants to leave, it will have to be fixed. Do you reckon Manure couldnt win the league without him? Yep he's a fuckin awesome player, and almost impossible to replace but other clubs have lost great players, spent the money wisely and still been equally as successful. You could have similar arguments for Henry at Arsenal, Owen at Liverpool or Van Nistelrooy at Man U. Ronaldo is still young, as opposed to Van Nistelrooy and Henry. Owen was still fairly young when he left Liverpool, but he was very injury-prone instead, something Ronaldo isn't. And what you said was "Imagine how good Man Ure would be if they had another £80m to spend, dare say they wouldn't miss Ronaldo that much." We're arguing that they would be worse off without Ronaldo but with the £80m.

I don't think Man U would be better off with another £80m to spend minus Ronaldo. Where would they put that money? They'd need a new RW, but that's about it really, except perhaps for back-up players. So, who'd they spend that cash on to make them a better team? Messi?

mackems.gif

Not saying he doesn't play good against big opposition, but if he doesn't, so what? He was a massive part in Man U winning the league last year, with his many many goals and assists. The three points against the bad teams are still three points, and how many of them did he get Man U last year? Class player, would be a loss to the league. Not saying he's a not crying, whining, diving, horrible little cunt.

Doesn't sound like a very encouraging start, tbh.

Think it'll be a 4-4-2 with Smith and Viduka up front. Will be interesting to see Geremi and Emre in midfield, could work quite well together

Me

Can't say I've seen enough of him to say whether he's a great keeper or not. But hey, he plays for Arsenal, so he must be good

How are people blaming Roz for their second? Great skill from Miller and a bit of luck. Not much Roz could've done there, IMO. Shite game though, especially second half, was terrible for 35 minutes. Duff looked decent though. In all, I'm blaming the Swedish commentator though, Arne Hegerfors, what a fucking colossal wanker

Is also going to ACN.

Second that.

Arshavin Youngster 1 Youngster 2

Smith has been captain when Geremi hasn't played, why wouldn't he be when Geremi is away this time?

Is also going to ACN.

Smith

Let's not get carried away here, when was the last time we kept back-to-back clean sheets?

Mick, could you post a link to those quotes in your sig?

Wonder what role he's being used in? Probably the same role we've seen Milner in the last few games

Here we go AGAIN...

Was just about to say. Didn't see all of it, flicked back and forth between it and the City-game, but from I saw, it was terrific

Who is? NSG? Kev