Ronaldo

What are the odds for a poor Torres being hauled off and replaced by Drogba on around 70 minutes?

Just give up, man. You're just a rubbish poster.

I win.

I can think of 2.

Not particularly, no. Then again, SAF would struggle to get anything out of some of the crap that have been getting a game recently.

My arse is Guthrie doing 'his best for NUFC'. The lad's a physical wreck and a bottler. I defended Bramble because he was made a scapegoat time and time again for the utter homegrown crap he played alongside. Four years later it's pretty obvious who the weak links were.

Because only a year back Barton was a complete waste of space and Guthrie was a good midfielder for the side. We're not doing the whole hindsight s*** again are we? "HAHA You thought Barton was s*** and look at him now!!!!1" Sorry that we don't all have a crystal ball like you. Wullie has a blind spot when it comes to players like Guthrie and Lovenkrands. Probably because it's more fun to blame the owner than players who just aren't performing. As opposed to you who has a blind spot when the likes of Guthrie and Lovenkrands actually put in a decent shift? Sorry I don't praise Premier League players to high heaven when they 'put in a decent shift' once every few months.

Because only a year back Barton was a complete waste of space and Guthrie was a good midfielder for the side. We're not doing the whole hindsight s*** again are we? "HAHA You thought Barton was s*** and look at him now!!!!1" Sorry that we don't all have a crystal ball like you. Wullie has a blind spot when it comes to players like Guthrie and Lovenkrands. Probably because it's more fun to blame the owner than players who just aren't performing.

It was a matter of weeks ago that you rated Steven Taylor over Mike Williamson. You're one to talk about Williamson, like. You wanted him out long before anyone else did.

It was only a year back that Wullie rated Guthrie more than Barton.

And also did very little.

Are we bollocks.

He was after that Orient game. Special cirumstances i'll acknowledge.

He can still be popular with the mainstream, even if the biased refuse to budge.

It was about 18 months ago that the forum went mad (I actually thought it was pretty positive news) when Hughton was appointed on a permanent basis. And it was less than 21 months back that I logged on to find a thread called 'Hughton is a yellow bellied coward', or something along those lines. He was universally disliked on here for a while.

Honestly, man. I can't work out if you lot are lacking any sort of convcition or just completely and utterly thick.

There's no reason Pardew can't achieve more than Hughton and become popular along the way.

Against Stoke, too.

Ameobi is only hugely important to himself.

I'm more referring to your anti-Pardew bias tbh.

I've heard it all before though mate. It's always the same... judge in summer... s***, well judge in January... s***, well the summer is the time to judge etc etc. There's a point where you have to say enough is enough, and I'm a long way past that point. Seeing as we're 9th, we should be demanding more than top 7. Suspect we'd be there anyway if we'd kept AC9. We were 12th when Pardew replaced your mate. Grow up man. Your points just don't quite add up, man. As much as I agree with a few of them.

I've heard it all before though mate. It's always the same... judge in summer... s***, well judge in January... s***, well the summer is the time to judge etc etc. There's a point where you have to say enough is enough, and I'm a long way past that point. Seeing as we're 9th, we should be demanding more than top 7. Suspect we'd be there anyway if we'd kept AC9. We were 12th when Pardew replaced your mate.

Barton, Tiote and Coloccini are all hugely important.

Not Hughton or Keegan.

Where's that stupid fella who told me he isn't one of the best strikers in the PL when you need him?