Ronaldo

He hits it long when he isn't, he hits it long a lot, that's a major issue. He's done well so far defensively in what? 6 games? That doesn't make him excellent nor does it call for that hyped up sentence from TCD. My original point was about someone comparing him with Puyol ffs, a mainstay in arguably the best passing team of all time. 12 games, not 6. In fact, he's played about 30 games for us as a defender and never really looked like a poor one since breaking through. I think the hoofing nonsense comes from those who wrongly wrote him off wanting to save face a bit.

Bit of a weird opinion, like, KI. Man U and Chelsea dominated the PL for 7 season while semi-frequently 'hoofing' it. It's hardly a major issue that one defender defends consistently well and hits it long under pressure.

He's got a cracking left foot, like.

From what I remember of his 6 goals most of them came from set pieces.

His years playing upfront he was 1 in 2. Pretty sure I read that when he first signed. He previously used to play out wide, but that was at least three years prior to joining us. I think the very best he's ever managed over a full season is about 1 in 3. I don't think for one second he'd do as well as that in the PL. Anyway, who cares? Cisse and Perez are better players and better strikers. Scored a goal every 2.6 games in 2011-2012 season and a goal every 2.2 games in 2012-2013. Its hard to judge him as a striker here when he's never been given a chance up front. Granted he's playing like shit at the moment, but playing out of position for years can do that to you. Not when you factor in the games he played for us that season. Either way, he had 8 goals in France when he signed for us at the end of January. It doesn't bode well.

It would appear that Jenas has just retweeted teeth.

I think my hatred for Villa has washed out. No longer bothered if they go down or not, to be honest.

His years playing upfront he was 1 in 2. Pretty sure I read that when he first signed. He previously used to play out wide, but that was at least three years prior to joining us. I think the very best he's ever managed over a full season is about 1 in 3. I don't think for one second he'd do as well as that in the PL. Anyway, who cares? Cisse and Perez are better players and better strikers.

A 1 in 4 striker from France. No need to tell fibs.

Did you inspect him for high heels?

I don't want to keep pissing on this sympathy parade but we're talking about a player who signed for us nearly 6 years ago and has a whopping 2 PL goals in that time. That's how much his one good attribute has contributed to the cause. Nice lad, good pro, shouldn't be anywhere near a PL squad.

Except a striker who scores goals while being ineffective outside the box still puts points on the board. A wing-back (?) who whips in a good free kick once in a while - and struggles with other aspects of the game - most certainly doesn't. Only one game stands out, and he was sent off.

Raylor's hopeless, man. Awful defender, midfielder and winger who strikes a ball well. If he didn't have that in his locker he'd be playing non-league.

He did, but only when he was absolutely physically spent in the latter stages of games in his last 3 seasons. Gerrard does it all the time now.

True, mind. Not even a shadow of the player he was 4 years back.

I'm sure not even your average doctor could ascertain an injury through watching him walk round an airport, like.

Man, you need help.

Please god no. There's no chance. It would cost money. Surely that channel's independent of AFC?

He looks unsuited to PL football because he has stubble?

And some cunt in a Volvo is pulling out in front.

Except the majority of the goals he's scored have come in the cup and Europe where he you know starts games. I don't, actually. Don't you think his return is 'not bad'?

10 goals for Kane this season. Not bad considering he's been on the bench most of the time.

Yep, like Jedinak.

Ha. Getin! Correct football again, no doubt.