Ronaldo

Generally he's a decent ambassador for the club, obviously works his nuts off and the players all seem to really like him.

I think the type of striker for me has a lot to do with the other purchases, if there are other purchases. We need 2 new players who'll contribute to set pieces for me.

Tooj, who would you sign to complement the attack next season, out of curiosity?

Ugh, I hate being owned. We should all know by now that Cheick Tiote's no.1 fan thinks it's too obvious to say more creativity and goals are needed.

Yeah, that's off the mark.

What's funny about that? He's just not very bright, bless him.

It can only be Cisse or Krul having thought about it a little.

He's had 2 and a half good months, man.

The problem with goals and creativity - from set pieces and in open play - is the main thing than needs to be sorted in the summer.

Yep. Fucking horrible.

Santon or Raylor, man. Come on.

Well that's the problem with the rule about the referee having dealt with the incident at the time. It should be changed, but it doesn't make this ban wrong. Do you think biting somebody is 7 games worse than breaking their leg? Depends how the leg was broken. Recklessness will never really have parity with intent to do harm.

The 11/12 review is atonishingly bad considering how fantastic the season was. Glad I didn't actually pay for one.

That is a thing of beauty. With a NUFC player avatar. Who's that? Juventus.

You're joking, aren't you? The only time his shoulder will be under any threat from our lot is when Shola asks for his shirt at the end of the game.

No, I don't think anybody is advocating that at this stage. Just saying, like Routledge, we could've done with him at times this season.

Aye, Spain, where you effectively get banned for pulling funny faces. They'd function much better over there, like.

Not trying to change anybody's mind, just Kluivert's a very poor example of what you're trying to convey about the FS era. Kluivert was a very good footballer and getting him was an astute piece of business given his pedigree and what we needed at the time - a replacement for Shearer. He could and should have been a success here.

About right, yes.

Fair play.

Not in Kluivert's league. PK cost us about £37m less, too.

Not to mention the fact he was actually a very, very good player.

Me too. Doesn't mean he's any good, like.

I'd have it back now. Really? They were some good times to be fair, spunked a lot of money on fatties like kluivert and such but wasn't all bad. Aye. That free transfer Kluivert is the best example by far.