AyeDubbleYoo

Yeah of course, but what I mean is, I guess people gave that feedback just because it was better for them personally.

For the people who can log on I guess it gives us more chance, but I think it's slightly unfair for the people who can only do the ballot. I didn't read the justification they gave, I know people wanted the general sale period but I don't see any non-selfish reasons that it's better. For me it will make things easier.

Exactly. At least we have two shots, but it does mean you spend a lot of time working for your ticket.

Makes you wonder how it hard it is to win in the ballot now

I don’t think anyone could complain about a badge, it’s an image which can be made accessible by things like an alt tag which describes what the image contains. It would be like complaining about a drawing or a photo. It’s good practice to be legible in every thing and digital will be a major driver for people changing badges. But I’d say it’s more a matter of having something that stands out and is easy to use in various context. Not accessibility guidelines. And in our case it’s using a retro badge, which is probably just because it’s cool.

Villa sold two fairly important first team players like, including their best midfielder. Granted, they did it with less of a rush than us, but our sales were less harmful.

Yeah, I'm just saying it's more for ease of use and versatility of a brand mark, along with a trend, rather than because of accessibility in the sense of disabled access.

I don't think accessibility guidelines would cover a logo or badge, would it? You could add features, like an alt tag, to describe the badge digitally. You wouldn't be legally required to simplify the badge itself. I think the simplification of badges is part trend and part to make it more nice-looking against a wider range of backgrounds and on various different channels. Maybe it's a good idea for a few reasons but I doubt it's legally required.

Apply this question to every fucking thing on transfer rumour Twitter

It doesn't but still tempting to get on it ASAP.

Isaac Hayden levels of enjoying a slide tackle.

Logged on straight away at lunch, must've been before they sent the email out.

Don’t be silly.

When both playing well there’s not too much between them. Botman looked immense when he was really cooking.

It’s not trying to change the importance of the real badge though, it’s just a cool design choice that might make people interested in buying more kits.

Have they sold Diaby? Missed that.

Football behaves like a very amateur industry sometimes. Leaving all the deals until so close to the deadline is mad. The fact you can advertise deadline day as an entertainment event shows how crazy everyone’s behaviour is.

Guess the loan is just an accounting trick.

Can’t stand Gallagher, runs around and flatters to deceive. Wouldn’t be happy with him here at all.

I like how Joelinton always just looks like he's in a holiday snap with his mates and has no idea about posing.

Looks a lot better on the players than in the leaked photos. Not bad for a third kit. Interesting they're saying it's mint and not Saudi green.

I mean, nothing on twitter means anyting until he's signed.

The logos look like they're trying to run away from each other. Unless nobody in Milan trains chest.

Think CB pace is slightly overrated TBH. In a well-organised team you really shouldn't be finding CBs isolated and exposed running back to their own goal. Of course it's nice to have and ideally we would.

WTF is anyone buying Sancho for £60m? Are there only 7 footballers in the world or something?