Heron

This is the issue for me. No one knows enough. If they literally flipped the stadium like Bilbao (?) And turned the Leazes end 180° I'd probably be entirely for it. But moving it up into the Town Moor or worse, elsewhere is not something I'd like.

I was too and 100% understand this. However, that is the risk we took. I lost all my loyalty points (around 80) and cannot get to away games. I feel for you (and others like you) but I don't think we need say 20/30k increased capacity to accommodate those folk.

In your previous point you were alluding to the fact that fans won't support Newcastle if they cannot get to their games. I think whilst that may be somewhat correct, it is not the largest driving factor for why fans won't support Newcastle. If we're a good team who play good football - that is what will ultimately drive people to support us. I'd be surprised if most folk in Newcastle (and it's surrounding areas) choose not to support Newcastle, especially if we're a good side. Most Man United fans globally will probably only ever once get to Old Trafford but thy exist in what is most likely their hundreds of thousands (if not millions) because they were the dominant force of English football. Man City probably now has grown its support for the same reason. Again, appreciate that adds weight to increasing stadium size and increasing revenue to become the financial egg that the good-football chicken is hatched from. However, it is only the case because of FFP and PSR etc. Why invest billions(?) On a new stadium that it would take decades to see a return on if it was just for a return on national PR by having the best footballing side available/dominance in a sporting field? They could simply spend that money on better training facilities, staff and players (were there to be no FFP, etc.). St James' Park may not have the capacity to play host to every Newcastle fan or enough that would be deemed satisfactory, you're right - we can agree. However, what about other factors? What about the fact that ticket prices will likely shoot up to help pay for it and boost revenue (to achieve a higher FFP/PSR) capability? Thus meaning some fans are priced out. What about if they do not consider standing or singing sections to ensure there is a good atmosphere? What about if they don't consider the acoustics of the stadium? What about if most the additional capacity is corporate? What about if it's a big Green and White Stadium and called the Aramco Arena with little link to Newcastle's history? What about the loss of activity in the town centre of it relocated a sufficient distance out? People may want this new American kind of style entertainment with light shows and 5 star meals available and all that jazz but it's not for me. I don't want my ticket price going up and the atmosphere being lost and ultimately part of the soul that is Newcastle United so that potentially an extra 10/20k fans can have a day out. We can (most likely) increase the capacity at SJP (for those who'd like to regularly attend) without the need for a relocation of the stadium, and avoid much of the above. Of course - in my opinion.

Appreciate your point but not for me. We will have fans if we play good football. The rules make us move stadium to enable us to invest and utilise revenue to then enable us to play better football through increased "natural" revenue. Can build seats but folk won't come unless we play attractive football and unless tickets are priced fairly. Next after the stadium move will be a ticket price hike to pay for it.

Just find it all a bit shit tbh PSR supposed to protect clubs in communities but foreign money tearing existing heritage away in favour of revenue to overcome rules that are currently being proven to be a pile of shite. Working man's game my arse.

Moving stadium is minging unless it literally backs onto the existing one. That is all.

Ultimately - this was all a ploy from the pre-existing elite to stop Newcastle United dead in its tracks when seemingly there was political pressure to accept our takeover from Saudi owners. It's minging really. The Premier League is now being hung out to dry because of its incompetent self-governance and greed and the can is kicked so far down the road by government and governing bodies that ultimately it has (or should have) been a ticking time bomb for the PL who've failed to get themselves in order. The "pre-existing elite" absolutely rule the roost and it's (the PL) been proven to not only be a negligent, greedy and inept organisation but a corrupt one too. There won't be any back tracking of pressure to receive Saudi money. However, the FA should and can step in (as I understand) to either remove or entirely rebuild the Premier League as an organisation that is fit for purpose. For me it has to be the former, with any new "marketing" of the league. If they want to protect investment from sponsors and continue the whole "best league in the world" spiel. Ultimately, it has to be competitive though for that to remain - and so those clubs need brought into check to realise they cannot have a closed shop.

Surely the FA step in if the PL don't have their house in order? Quick win would be sacking Masters and those culpable for members losing faith in the current set up. Employing a new head and installing some sort of control measure whilst the PL got its act together one would assume.

well played.

...and they've been known to kick the can down the road. Genuine question though...who governs the Premier League? The FA and English/European law in the first instance(s)?

He's my biggest fan too.

You'd like to think (as a neutral with the best interests of the game at heart) there'd be a legal alternative provided to prevent absolute chaos from reigning irrespective of the vote on Friday. Like surely there cannot be only one plan. If so, then my God the PL really are an absolute farcical laughing stock of thieving, greedy, lickspittles.

If the vote isn't passed then surely it creates an entirely anarchistic type situation for the Premier League and I'd presume its member could theoretically write to the governing body (The FA? UEFA? FIFA?) To give it a vote of no confidence. I mean that may seem a little extreme. However, it's what's needed in reality. Said reform could take months or years.

Is Richard Masters really Elon Musk?

Wilson has probably scored more than him this season

Dominic Fucking Calvert Lewin Who's smoking crack?

Aye he should have timed his run. 👀😅

Belter that man <3 Means a massive amount to their parents too - I am sure.

Thing is cities and suburbs expand and grow so, really so should definition. I don't suspect anyone calls themselves anything other than a Geordie if they're from anywhere within about a 5 to 10mile radius of Newcastle North of the Tyne and South of the Tyne probably about 4 or 5miles.

Italy looked void of attacking focus and direction and susceptible to defensive mistakes. However, have a very competent midfield 5. France were good from set plays and are generally a good side capable of pulling apart sides on their day. With Thuram they have exactly what Italy don't.

Seems a bit harsh tbh. Italy seem to lack from having a real quality striker and a focal point for me. Tonali wasn't so much 'anonymous' it was more that Italy lacked direction. It was back and sideways and no one looking to commit defenders. Retegui did little up top versus the likes of Thuram who was quite the opposite for France and was a bit of a handful. Tonali was the man linking passes from defence to the more attacking members of midfield for the most part but that was the extent of their game.

Absolutely. FWIW I agree with much you've said. I just get frustrated that folk seem desperate to make the most of Longstaffs limitations but unwilling to praise his abilities. It is okay to be wrong or to change your opinion, just as I have with Hall (in that thread). Either way, if we keep winning then I am happy. FWI(also)W I actually love Tonali - I was singing his song in Bergamo airport this morning

It's the attitude that some folk semeingly take to both players. We are winning games and playing well to a man. So no need to change it unless it's strategical. It's that simple. We aren't in a position to do so at present. So I'd prefer we stick with getting results than playing a player to appease a cross section of fans. When Tonali Starts, we perform and we get a result Tonali will remain. Of that I am sure. Howe knows better than any person on here - myself included.

Who?

AssisTino