You could probably count the number of meaningful touches Lovenkrands has had this season on one hand. He's totally anonymous these days, has bugger all impact on games.
Really hope I'm wrong, but it looks like a fucking awful decision from Hughton.
http://canadiangeordie.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/chris_hughton.png
Ying and Yang
http://www.fengshuihelp.com/Images/yin_yang.gif
Chris Hughton's hair
If Shola's a 'doubt' then he shouldn't be featuring at all. Firstly, he plays like shit when carrying an injury and secondly there's a chance he'll aggravate the injury and miss even more games.
Having said that, I'm not sure who I'd start up top with Carroll. Nolan isn't suited to the role, especially at home. Ranger's too raw, Lovenkrands has no impact on games anymore and Xisco is very short of match practice. Best too is just coming back from injury.
I'd not be shocked to see Guthrie playing right wing and Routledge behind Carroll, actually.
Fulham's replacement for the injured Salcido only made his full debut last night, he's only 19. We'd be mental not to start a proper winger against him, someone quick like Routledge could really worry someone with little experience.
Just rewatching MoTD and they say Fulham haven't won an away league match in 15 months. I will be flabbergasted if they don't win, that stat is made for them to win against us.
Can everyone calling for him to get banned kindly fuck off? We've had enough decisions go against us this season that has cost us points, so why call for a decision that could go either way to work against our favour, and weaken the team considerably, just to claim some sort of moral high ground?
Yes, but Ronaldo needs a scapegoat and who better to help him gloss over Coloccini's rick than Mike Williamson, the man he's slated and put down even after good performances?