-
Posts
62,538 -
Joined
Everything posted by Interpolic
-
mackems vs Newcastle United - Sunday 5 April @ 4.00pm (live on Sky)
Interpolic replied to maybe_next_year's topic in Football
Again my logic is that it's the biggest game of Carver's career. If he loses this he's done, and I'm not that lucky. -
I've been there, burnt it to the ground. Daft cunt.
-
Sums it all fucking up, that. When your only motivation as a club is to exist and your manager is actively seeking to kill any fun associated with the actual matchday then there really isn't a point at all. I was impressed with us 2nd half against Arsenal but he's fucked that completely with those comments. Fat little bellend is so far up Pardew's arse it's unreal. Insufferable, tedious wankers who shouldn't be allowed any near a football pitch.
-
mackems vs Newcastle United - Sunday 5 April @ 4.00pm (live on Sky)
Interpolic replied to maybe_next_year's topic in Football
I think we'll win tomorrow like. Would be very surprised at anything less than a draw. -
It's just very, very boring and really cheap and nasty-looking. Could have been worse but it's still shite.
-
Seriously Wullie mate, is it something to do with Star Wars or something? I can't get my head around it.
-
The only good things about the home shirt are that they've kept it simple and it has black and white stripes. Looks fucking cheap and nasty though, as ever. Adidas did a few naff kits for us but they did some absolutely beautiful ones as well. The badge not being embroidered makes a big difference like. I actually quite liked the one we wore the season we finished 5th like, was quite a stylish design. In general though they just need to keep it simple, make it look quite well made, with maybe the odd nice touch like a grandad colour or a blue trim. We basically look like Wigan these days, which is annoying as we used to have quite a nice strip.
-
What the absolute fucking hell is that?
-
mackems vs Newcastle United - Sunday 5 April @ 4.00pm (live on Sky)
Interpolic replied to maybe_next_year's topic in Football
Somebody take Man Utd's 1999 European Cup off them. -
Fell for it completely. The thread titles on here are fucking dangerous, man.
-
Always the bridesmaids.
-
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/08/23/article-0-1B6C36B2000005DC-697_634x497.jpg
-
It's still a better job than most in this country and not that difficult these days either. We still attract decent players and the crowd expect nowt.
-
What does that matter though, if the costs have inexplicably risen by £30m or whatever it is. We'll have to see how the costs are broken down I suppose but if there's anything dodgy or creative or whatever you want to call it going on then I wouldn't say we're spending what we bring in at all. We'll see, but like everyone else I can't work out how the costs have risen that much.
-
"Nah, Wikipedia says Bobby Davro scored after 3 seconds against Malta"
-
I agree. I just don't think that's how he will see it, or he would have started doing it already. Paying off his £29m first would back you up. What reason was there for him to repay that beyond a stubborn principle that he had said he wasn't putting any more in after the Keegan affair? I think he'll stick to that though and stop repayments with the £29m satisfied. Why? It's an assumption as I said. I'm far more likely to believe he'll start pumping excess cash into anything but the playing squad unless we find ourselves in danger again. I firmly believe that they want us to actively avoid cup runs and European qualification in favour of the bare minimum that guarantees a place on the Premier League gravy train. Based on 7 years or so of evidence, and reading their bullshit about 5 year plans to become the next Arsenal or Villa or whoever suited them at the time. I understand that you think you've spotted a trend and am always interested to read an argument that is built on solid analytical grounding, but in this case I don't think your guess is better than mine or anyone else's. Who's to say he won't start using excess cash after the initial loan is paid off to pay off the remainder of his loan or do whatever he likes with it for that matter? Not you, not me, not anyone but the fat, evil, unpredictable cunt that's done whatever he likes since he stepped through the door. Assume the best all you like, but forgive me for assuming the worst. PS you said that this financial trend you'd spotted was the reason you had no doubt we'd appoint the best candidate as manager, so I'll be interested to hear what you have to say if Carver gets the gig full time or we go into next season with Mike fucking Williamson making 30-plus appearances a season. Again not a dig like mate, but this was correct then basically. Any attempt to assume the best was exactly that - an assumption. At that point nobody knew owt but I'd always be more inclined to assume the worst with this lot.
-
Said before. I now think we're at £5m as the kitty for this summer. Basically Our operating Profit. It'll actually be lower because we're going to finish lower in the league so broadcasting income will be down too. £18.7m profits reported in 13/14 and I make it an 18.6m net spend in 14/15 up to and including the sale of Santon. This isn't a dig but weren't you recently saying that you expected us to spend plenty in the summer and have plenty stored away for January? What's changed to make the budget £5m? Simply down to lower profits than expected (which seems to be a by-product of this mystery hike in costs)?
-
Will you give it a fucking rest man FFS.
-
Hypocritical given what I said the other week, but for the love of fuck somebody lock this cunt.
-
It's a good point like, whether the profit's as high as expected or not they recently admitted pulling out of a deal for a centre half in January, just in case the MYM transfer didn't go through. I know we're talking different financial years but I think the point still stands.
-
Same, what the fuck. How the hell did I miss that?
-
All of his articles are weird, he's off his fucking tits.