Interpolic

Tbh people can kick off about this all they like but our track record for leaving ourselves short at the expense of a few quid is there for all to see. Every chance it could have happened again, so it is effectively like a new signing. Is it fuck. We always needed a replacement for Shola and probably another one for depth, someone who isn't a first team player but more advanced than Campbell in the pecking order. Cisse leaving would have added another requirement on top of that, but he isn't so we haven't changed at all. Ah, you must be sure that we would have signed 2 strikers if Cisse left then. Soz like, I'm just not such a pure mug. Nah I didn't have faith that would happen, it's what we need imo though. So it's potentially like a new signing then, given that we might well not have replaced him. Cheers for participating. Whatever mate. Whatever all you like, the people you're trying to mug off are right and you're wrong.

Tbh people can kick off about this all they like but our track record for leaving ourselves short at the expense of a few quid is there for all to see. Every chance it could have happened again, so it is effectively like a new signing. Is it fuck. We always needed a replacement for Shola and probably another one for depth, someone who isn't a first team player but more advanced than Campbell in the pecking order. Cisse leaving would have added another requirement on top of that, but he isn't so we haven't changed at all. Ah, you must be sure that we would have signed 2 strikers if Cisse left then. Soz like, I'm just not such a pure mug. Nah I didn't have faith that would happen, it's what we need imo though. So it's potentially like a new signing then, given that we might well not have replaced him. Cheers for participating.

Doubt he cares much either way TBH. Ah, you really keep this place ticking along.

Tbh people can kick off about this all they like but our track record for leaving ourselves short at the expense of a few quid is there for all to see. Every chance it could have happened again, so it is effectively like a new signing. Is it fuck. We always needed a replacement for Shola and probably another one for depth, someone who isn't a first team player but more advanced than Campbell in the pecking order. Cisse leaving would have added another requirement on top of that, but he isn't so we haven't changed at all. Ah, you must be sure that we would have signed 2 strikers if Cisse left then. Soz like, I'm just not such a pure mug.

Tbh people can kick off about this all they like but our track record for leaving ourselves short at the expense of a few quid is there for all to see. Every chance it could have happened again, so it is effectively like a new signing.

Is there a market for him kissing the logo when he nets his first goal of the season?

They'll be mediocre as fuck, same as us. Their upper limit is super low. A 10th place finish would provoke street parties.

Fucking Christ Almighty, this thread.

Sounds like an absolute muppet.

On Tapatalk, the first character of people's posts is getting missed off now and then, i.e. you can't see it, it'll say "ecause" instead of "Because". Thought it was a bunch of typos then noticed it on one of my own posts, went to edit it and I hadn't missed anything off. Might just be Tapatalk like.

Couple of people on here said it. proof then some see it as a flimsy excuse so have defaulted to N'zogbia as the last flimsy excuse. Insomnia didn't want an improved contract.

Couple of people on here said it.

You dont tend to normally. I insist.

Bit of a tongue twister there.

Has anyone actually seen Carlton Cole's Crystal Palace contract?

It wasn't too bad until we sold Milner and replaced him with 2 shit nobodies. Still needed more players. People are forgetting Guthrie btw.

I said that earlier and was ignored.

The people running the show at Newcastle are geet canny lads and probably did offer a compromise, it's just a shame that Cisse has stubbornly insisted on COKE, SLAGS AND POKER on his shirt or they can go fuck themselves.

What should we be blasting Wonga for? Just existing? Erm, yes? They exist and they're s***. They're also sponsoring us. Right, but that's kind of a given. You can't really 'blast' a company for existing. I don't like them, but they aren't breaking any laws and moral judgement on them is subjective at best. We're not likely to force out a sponsor by objecting to it, and I doubt strength of feeling would be strong enough anyway. Nobody should be blasting Cisse either mind. What do you mean you can't blast a company for existing? You sort of can when their entire existence is that they are a f***ing modern day loan shark, but that's besides the point. Instead of directing the focus on Cisse's hypocrisy direct it on what a s*** odious company Wonga are and how his moral or religious beliefs are perfectly reasonable. If anything is going to force some action from either Mike or Wonga it's the latter, a character assassination against Cisse just strengthens their position. if his beliefs are perfectly reasonable surely he'd refuse the barclays logo aswell ? Are you on repeat?

What has Cisse directly said? Why is it his place to come out publicly or sort out the situation beyond telling the club he's not happy about it? This is the sort of thing a club needs to sort out and the sort of situation we generally let escalate to our detriment.

Yeah, what Dave said. Club still getting the benefit of the doubt in times of ambiguity, ambiguity which they create by not saying anything.

To be fair it was reported almost from day one that we'd have a problem with the Muslim players over this. Cisse was consistently mentioned. Best I could find on google (from 1/9/2012 to 1/6/2013) was a few articles from the start by local clerics/imams about it, usual daily mail troublemaking although I think there was a telegraph article in there too. Nothing actually from the players themselves. And then radio silence. I reserve the right to be disappointed in him for leaving it to the 11th hour to start this. Or he's made his feelings known for a while and the club have left it until the 11th hour to... erm... do nothing? You know what the people running the club are like man, they haven't got a clue.

Debate would be weighted far more in Cisse's favour if he'd scored 25 goals last year btw. Then again we'd probs get loads of money for him then. Yeah, forget it.

Because the club have done fuck-all about it, presumably hoping it would blow over.

I don't think it's natural to start foaming at the mouth calling players they once adored greedy judas cunts as soon as they get into a dispute with the pricks running the club or look like they might leave, no. Would say that's pretty extreme behaviour.