Stifler

This. It’s just overboard now, any occasion and alcohol has to be the centre of it.

I don’t understand why people expected any different. It’s not part of their culture, and against their laws. It’s a bit like the people who go to Dubai and get arrested for being drunk and disorderly, or for being half naked sunbathing. This is what it comes down to for most people though. All the talk about human rights abuses, and such. It’s only an issue because they own us and the clubs other fans support have a challenger, and the issue for fans attending the World Cup is that they can’t get fucked on Carling. I wouldn’t be surprised if we have an article of someone going to the World Cup, and being stoped in customs trying to bring Coke in, and facing the death penalty.

Good news as it will likely end the repeated breaches of PSR, however he’s not exactly done well with Roma, so I don't really expect them to be challenging anyone anytime soon. It’s another American owner though, so you know, a step closer to the locked Premier League with added PLAY OFFS!

The club shop in the Metrocentre has a small amount of NUFC Gazelles in.

Nothing needed to do to keep her straight. She was answering in a way to tell the Lords ‘Yeah, I hear you, but you’re going too far, and this isn’t what the government wants’.

Lots of twisting of what she said. She actually said that there wouldn’t be any unnecessary revaluation of existing owners, and heavily indicated that everything would be more focussed on new owners. She also said that the government are not looking to outright ban anyone from owning club (I.E. state ownership) and there is no indication that the regulator would deviate from both the Premier Leagues, or EFL’s directors and owners test. She basically said that the government is open for business, in fact they even discussed the possibility of other states and Middle Eastern states buying clubs in the future, with name checks for Qatar, and Kuwait.

How’s that not a penalty? Oh yeah, Liverpool shirt.

Last season of two legs.

Get in! Up against it in the cup now though.

Arsenal are level, so if we do hold on, it looks like we’ll be up against it in the semi-final.

Aye, on TV you can tell the crowd has been turned down, even the speakers sound silent.

6 minutes? Fuck off man.

Get in!

If anything, that’s a penalty to us.

Surely a booking that?

Howay!

I thought Joelinton was banned.

For extra context. In the proposed bill that would form the regulation that the football regulator would have to adhere too/police, a Lord who has previously claimed to be a Liverpool (but during the discussion of this bill claimed to be a Brighton fan) proposed an amendment that would mean that no club that is owned by a foreign state, including public investment funds would be granted a licence to play football within the top 5 leagues of English football. The proposed amendment also forbid any government employee from being an owner or director (including our own government, which would have affected Karen Brady as well). The government minister who is advising the House of Lords on the bill asked them to withdraw the proposed amendment, as they don’t want to exclude people unfairly from owning or being a part of football clubs. It also had a number of reservations being asked about it by a number of Lords. When a government minister asks for it to be withdrawn, it pretty much means that the government won’t adopt it further down the line, if the Lord who proposed it still insists on it. As it happens the Lord who proposed it withdrew it. An objection to it by any other Lord would have seen it not moved (also rejected) as well.

It means it was rejected.

Amendment withdrawn.

House of Lords is now discussing the amendment in the football governance bill that would effect us. https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/73011c64-91aa-47aa-98ab-0c8378d3e047

Why the fuck do all our fans seem to still have Twitter?

Lloyds bank is taking the ground floor unit, which is going to free up their building on Grey Street to The Ivy. Some section of it is becoming another location from the people who have Lane7. The very top unit is set to become a restaurant.

Without joking, if the figure is 300, she’s housed 1% of them. She used to adopt children, but is retired now, so someone she knows got her into hosting international students, in particular Saudi’s. She’s been invited over to Saudi, one of them in particular appears to be fairly wealthy.

Also in the last day, they have had to defend their racism. We don't owe anyone any apology for our reporting on infections people have derived after using certain barber shops, and to accuse these people of simply making it up when they or their children have experienced some of the horrific things shown in those photos is very, very bad faith. This isn't about race. Everyone is entitled to have a trade and earn a living, but the issues reported to be caused by these institutions are not only widely and meticulously documented nationwide, but are supported by health professionals and reported in most news sources. As we have stated multiple times clearly there is a demand for such services, and there is nothing wrong with that, they're popular for a reason. All that is being asked is that care and consideration is taken. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/35kT8VSUaxR7JGkR/?mibextid=wwXIfr Just another Facebook group trying to portray themselves as news.