Jump to content

FloydianMag

Member
  • Posts

    2,446
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FloydianMag

  1. No wonder the PL are challenging CAT jurisdiction, they certainly don’t want a public hearing.
  2. Me too, however I’d like to see the takeover completed ASAP.
  3. Are the PL in for the long haul, having their dirty washing sired in public, hopefully not.
  4. I’m not sure, I’m sure it was a result of this forum closing. Someone started a ‘not 606 forum’ https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/sporteditors/2011/05/the_closure_of_606.html
  5. Well whoever reached the verdict will have to give reasons on why they came to that decision.
  6. If it isn’t bollocks it’ll certainly burst fannies balloon.
  7. In what way? I thought the Saudis were waiting on the sidelines rather than any actual involvement.
  8. Exactly, if CAT accept jurisdiction and we lose arbitration it doesn’t matter how far down the line the Tribunal is Ashley will want his revenge. The CAT ruling if it goes in his favour will be massive.
  9. If they want a cheap lunchtime menu then they’re spoiled for choice at a number of Sambuccas??
  10. Yes, but it’s not made up as the poster I replied to indicated. The tweet is BS as it’s from 2020.
  11. That room number actually exists. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-revenue-customs/contact/overseas-tax-administrations-help-from-hmrc-experts
  12. I’m sure a way would be found, like we’ve found/been given additional information etc.
  13. I agree, however common sense and legal opinions/court rulings are entirely different things to common sense.
  14. Then that assumes the PL have decided that PIF and the Saudi state are one and the same thing despite there being legal opinion indicating that PIF is a separate entity.
  15. No, however it would mean full and open disclosure, something the PL might not want.
  16. If it isn’t who then decides, CAT, Courts? Remember they can only decide on the O&D test that existed in April 2020 as I believe they now have a more robust test in place.
  17. Didn’t Ashley’s CAT action include compensation and injunctive relief against the PL O&D test? Does arbitration include agreeing compensation? I assumed, maybe wrongly, that it was whether PIF was a separate entity from the Saudi state?
  18. The decision could have been made yesterday.
  19. Has it? I’ve just used that link at it seemed to be ok.
  20. Maybe because it would strengthen the calls for a truly independent regulator, something they really fear.
  21. I’ve no more facts it’s happening than those who think it’s not happening. It’s 50/50.
  22. Glass half empty bloke eh? There’s probably more than 50% chance that they’ll own us, pessimism/optimism, I know which one gives me hope, if it doesn’t happen then I’ll get over the disappointment.
×
×
  • Create New...