r0cafella

They can’t, they have no provision in the rules to stop this. People will cite good faith but that’s such a weak provision especially as a few of these deals have already gone through.

Yes and no, even though this is obviously a FFP fudge you’re staying paying for this guy over the course of however long his contract is. If hes useless then this is a terrible deal.

Yes but we are buying forests third choice keeper for a fee which hasn’t emerged yet.

Everyone should remember that these dodgy none swap deals still have to be paid for in terms of amortisation. Taking players in these deals who offer nothing really isn’t good.

Hopefully we aren’t inflating too much for a random mid keeper.

We don’t have the actual figures so you have a lot of people making a lot of different estimates and guesses.

We should be yes, the worst estimate was 40m over. These two should cover that.

We can safely ignore such nonsense rumours.

Possibly but why leave it so late if that’s the case? It would also be poor on our part.

The rules in place (which will be tightened with squad cost ) are an absolute disgrace make no mistake. The fact the club doesn’t actually complain about them and seemingly votes for them tells me we are more of an asset than a sports washing program.

I actually feel like what’s transpired doesn’t actually matter much. I like Anderson and on a personal level I really feel bad for the way he’s essentially been shifted out. Minteh will be forgotten about if we get an olise level right winger later. I really struggle to put my finger on how we’ve got here though, I actually believe we left open some of the low hanging sponsorships for this exact moment.

No.

I recall posting about the pitfalls of FFP and a lot of responses I received were our owners will figure it out they are super smart etc came up. Do people still feel that way? Or has this weekend been an eye opener? Really curious how other people perceive this now.

I do not believe we were offering Gordon to anyone. And won’t until I see some verified sources say so.

10m can’t be true, less than those lads who haven’t kicked a ball.

Wow,

The reporting period is 3 years, we had to remain in compliance that’s all. I’m not in anyways defending the rules either I’ve been one of the most vocal saying we have to challenge them to move forward but as we haven’t here we are.

No people need to stop this weird track of we tried, it doesn’t work Forest got deducted for this. We’ve had 3 years to balance the books not 3 weeks.

Not happening

I’ll believe these Gordon stories when it comes from Ornstein or Caulkin or Waugh. I’m certain we don’t sell Gordon unless the money is truly daft 100m +

You mean for the rest of this weekend or the rest of the window? For the rest of the window no, another season of Miggy and Murphy :/

You’re missing the point but it’s all good.

We are fucked unless the rules change or we can grow our revenue massively. Our rate of growth has to surpass that of the sky6 if not we are falling behind. think about it.

It is indeed irrelevant; Luke opinion has zero bearing on the situation.