r0cafella

In 2023 our amortization plus salaries were higher than turnover. To be compliant we would need to reduce either turnover or amortization or sell someone. Rancid rules.

Our wages alone are more than 70% iirc. I said when this was published this will absolutely cripple us.

The reasoning for that is due to alignment with Uefa rules which is fine in principle. The issue is the punishments which do and will continue to differ.

One thing is clear, Forest absolutely took the piss out of us. Give us one of your best young talents we will give you one of the worst goal keepers in premier league history and 15mil.

The rumblings over the past couple of days seems to indicate he might fail the no dickhead rule. Also isn't he right footed? For my money we are desperate for a left footer for the right flank.

Absolutely and it's an issue with the rules. The historic spend has a compounding affect. It's why if we actually wanted competitive balance we need to index for football inflation and give every club an allowance meaning they can spend as much as the highest spender.

Romano linking Kayode to Brentford, has he been bad this season or something? Was meant to be an elite talent.

This happening or nah?

Btw this is why we need to be multiclub btw. They bought him a year ago and just parked him at sister club. We are missing so many tricks.

So this has to be assessed at fair market value, how on earth do you calculate that?

If I heard correctly the PFA have a collective bargaining agreement which prohibits them.

Yes unofficially though. And unfortunately when you give people a lot of money this kind of behaviour is to expected.

They've basically picked the Portuguese version of ETH. highly rated manager from a second tier league with some flashes in Europe which has convinced the world he's the second coming. The appointment is a massive risk for them.

One of the reasons from what I read yeah. The other was the data not being fit for purpose.

The lack of embedded tweets from @SUPERTOON have indeed been a drag these past 18 months.

Yeah I get your point it's not one I can agree with but I understand your reasoning. If a manager wishes to pick and choose which players he's managing and be totally dogmatic it's fine as long as your winning. When you aren't it's hugely problematic. I think Ange at Spurs is a perfect example of this. To add on, one of the reasons Howe is very highly rated by most of our fans is his ability to get more from players than what people thought they were capable of, it's the mark of a good manager. On the face of it, we aren't seeing anything like this at your lot just people saying how terrible every player is.

Your a generous soul. Radcliffe would obviously have his share of blame but the way Manchester United fans are bending over backwards to absolve the manager of any responsibility is fascinating.

Fair enough Your owner doesn't seem like the patient type so this seems like a gamble on his part.

Where do you stand on the narrative about the system ? Surely a good manager has to adapt to his players? Nobody is saying he can't play his system when he has the players suited for it. It all seems very odd from the outside looking in.

@Froggywhat are your thoughts on how things are going on the pitch ?

This is the problem with a lot of automated systems. Absolutely no space for any form of exception and manually intervention is far too much trouble. Awful stuff.

Bro don't do it to yourself. PSR has absolutely nothing to do with sustainability that's just how it was sold. It's an anti competitive ruleset designed solely to maintain a status quo.

These historic psr advocates being constrained by the very thing they have championed when they need a new squad is glorious.

No need to problem solve solutions the rules are created by design to prevent any competition and lock in the status quo. Clubs on the whole do not want to have to compete it's as simple as that.

They are absolutely toothless.