r0cafella

From that angle this summer and next. But as other clubs have shown you don’t have to sell your best players. Liverpool haven’t since Coutinho.

You said sell Joelinton for 30m how would that be )good? It would be a disaster. Yes we have to trade but at maximum value 30m certainly isn’t that. He’s one of the best midfielders in the league if you can’t get 75m + for him you keep him. The end of June was certainly chaotic but it worked out perfectly, we didn’t weaken ourselves much and remained complaint, on top of that one of our worst performing financial years has dropped off and will be replaced by one which is likely break even. You can ask anyone on this forum if they have rather lost Joelinton or Minteh and you will be lucky to find 10 people who think letting Joe go instead would be a good move.

He’s too old and has no resale value. (When I sold I mean you are unlikely to make a profit on sale if you hold onto him for 2-3 years).

What was the alternative? Sell your best players. We have to player trade and as you are no doubt are aware, the best players to trade with are those with little or no book value.

Brother; nobody has written more about PSR on this forum than me, so please pull the over one.

And we were fine, ultimately the problem with posters like yourself is you seem to miss the nuance of the situation. Kind noises aside the club were perfectly comfortable with losing both Anderson and Minteh. You may wonder that is but it’s quite straightforward. We need to invest in our team to go to the next level in order to do so we have to player trade and that’s exactly what happened. We made 5x in a year on Minteh and the proceeds of that deal paid for Tonali, Tino Hall, Barnes Isak Gordon. It’s what we have to do, stop using it’s a stick to beat the club with, if they want to progress they have no choice.

That’s another issue, Ashworth didn’t want to sell Joelinton, he just didn’t want to make pay him Bruno money.

But big Joe is much better than either of Minteh and Anderson.

Forest wouldn’t buy Anderson unless we took him basically. We needed Anderson to be the make weight to solve our FFP issues, if not a heavy hitter would have to been sold (Likely Gordon).

Would you? Let’s be honest he doesn’t support and his options are looking rather good, why would he sweat it?

I don’t think Anderson is particularly linked to this tbh, Palace will want to either sell him this window or extend him. If neither happens they are kissing goodbye to 15m at least.

Hilarious consequence of how they managed things, the one club which shouldn’t struggle for homegrown players is them Re Tosin I’ve got no issues, it’s his choice after all. At the end of the day he has to maximise his earnings it’s a short career. Ultimately a very small percentage of players will achieve win trophies etc so getting to the bag is the best option for a pragmatic player.

Because he’s probably still the second best keeper at the club and it’s poor form to take someone’s squad number?

Fume on here if Liverpool buy Guehi and we buy Gomez will be of epic proportions

Bailey is a bit of a bullshit merchant but if we let him go on loan we have to include an obligation to buy. He’s surplus to requirements at this stage.

Let’s see how it affects them, Chelsea seem to not care much for team cohesion or team spirit and rely on the financial incentives side. Exactly what you’d expect from venture capitalist fc.

Oh yeah for sure, the first few years will be painful for them as the hall hasn’t started rolling. If they would have been successful over these last 2 years those players would have at least maintained the value.

Keep the best ones and sell the ones that don’t make the grade. It definitely looks chaotic but they are essentially gaming the system because they have the revenue to eat the amortisation. Bear in mind, if they sell a player on after 2 years for the same as what they’ve paid they actually given themselves FFP headroom.

Nah, not worried let’s gauge things when the window closes. I’m sure the club is working hard to improve the team.

Is it? Or is it another FFP fudge ? Ultimately these silly rules are being gamed right left and centre by those clubs who actual want to compete.

Rather we address right wing first, yes we need to address right centre half but it’s something I’d do next season. At most I’d sign someone who can learn from Schar to develop.

No, it doesn’t make sense for either party.

We generally have too many centre backs, the quality is questionable no doubt and the injury’s in the medium term present challenges but come Christmas we will have more defenders than we know what to do with.

https://newcastle-online.org/topic/27010-twitter-nonsense/page/355/#comment-8124139

Even other clubs fans on Reddit where we are loathed were saying it was nonsense.