Jump to content

Marmoset

Member
  • Posts

    1,539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Marmoset

  1. That'll do for now. No point signing someone who demands to play ahead of the younger players with potential.
  2. Apparently willing to take a short term very cheap deal, will probably be a bit of a stopgap until next year or we'll buy in January if needed. Not much problem with it. Medical by the end of the week by the looks of Twitter.
  3. Does he identify as Asian or European then?
  4. Bet his wiki page hits have taken a spike today.
  5. Flags and country borders are nonsense like, just creates so many wars and problems and prevents us advancing as a species. We are one. God I miss being a righteous self important 17 year old.
  6. Yeah I imagine it was a just a realistic for his worth (insulting to him previously on a multi-year around 50k) offer and he can get better with more playing time, when not injured, elsewhere.
  7. True, but the next tournament is two years away. There's no immediate rush.
  8. If it was 8m he'd probably get a chunky signing on fee and a bit of a wage rise. Would hope and he seems he has a bit more about him than that though.
  9. Clicked new and haven't read this thread in a while so no idea who I'm responding to
  10. In tournaments you have to take a certain amount of risks. A fit Wilshire on form is by far and away more creative than any of our other cms (Alli apart who isn't quite as good on the ball in tight situations imo) so he has to go. It isn't about who's done more to 'deserve' it in the previous season, it's about who gives you the best chance in the tournament, as harsh as that is on those that miss out.
  11. See Micah Richards, Phil Jones, possibly soon Stones? It's one of those positions that for all the physical attributes or technique on the ball in the world, it's what's between the ears which is most important.
  12. Why should England actually have real options to influence games, to try and win the tournament? Surely it's better to placate the pundits and media in order to avoid criticism for leaving out the household names. I honestly had hope for Hodgson. Hope he does well but with that selection he's looking at an early exit imo. Possibly even in the group stage. Which household names do you think he should've left out?
  13. But i haven't seen much of him when he has played as a proper cm.
  14. That's what I was think tbh, if we play in a two I want him right behind them.
  15. Only watched maybe 4 or 5 full Alli games and he's usually had license to roam when I've had, anyone care to enlighten me what he's like it he's asked to be more disciplined? Decent enough defensively/doesn't give possession away daftly?
  16. People keep saying sturridge is out of form? He's been pretty effective this season when fit hasn't he?
  17. I would have taken Townsend fwiw but don't think Milner going is a bad thing, he's a solid player in several positions. He's not going to produce some 'magic' but you can't base all your criteria of who to take on that.
  18. People complain about picking the old guard. People complain about picking promising youngsters for the future. People complain.
  19. Nah he'll be ok. Edit: about milner
  20. Quietly had a decent season.
  21. So he had an exit clause in his contract exclusively for clubs from Qatar and China? The money-grabbing f***er. I think he means his exit clause was big so only clubs from China Qatar etc could afford it, not a club from Argentina.
×
×
  • Create New...