Kid Icarus

Dubravka: 6.5 Livramento: 6.5 Botman: 6.5 Burn: 6.5 Hall: 7 Tonali: 8 Bruno: 6 Joelinton: 6 Gordon: 6 Isak: 8 Murphy: 7.5

It's 5:43am and you've fallen asleep, but

Quoted for future reference.

Absolutely mad match tbf, could easily be a different outcome against a different team

He's fucking class, he's just back from injury and hasn't got straight back into form

You're not Yorkie you're rubbish

Please tell me you were doing this

He'll be areet

I feel like he's on the edge of getting into some form. He's not there yet but it feels like it's coming.

Made up the GD on Chelsea as well 🤌

Definitely. When Isak scored the 2nd I went "Is that it!?". Atrocious defending to have 3 at the back and allow a goal like that to happen.

I'm actually slightly unsettled by how easy this has been. We've barely bothered.

*nodding* clashing kits

Trossard just Cruyff turned Pedro Porro into a coma

We're not being cocky, but we need to be careful not to get too comfortable with the scoreline and it seeming like we're in control in 2nd gear. Wolves are wearing sheep's clothing a bit here, weeeeeey, and tactically look set up well to get something on the break. We could do with a few more playing with the intent and enthusiasm that Murphy is.

It's fine, just never ever do it again.

Yeah that's a good point.

The wage thing is a mindset thing more than anything surely? If we'd signed him for ~£12m and he was on £50k a week it shouldn't be less of a problem because Bournemouth got the money instead of him. Players who run down their contracts nigh on always get paid more because they have that leverage don't they.

Yeah, I don't think there's any argument against people simply wanting to get it in like

Calm down LFEE, Jesus You're asking a basic question about advertising and sponsorship based on stadium attendance, but that's chicken feed. The reality is that the overwhelming majority of the eyes on those things will be watching it around the world and the income is based on that and how much further exposure there is to that through the Champsions League and so on, not the amount of people in the stadium.

And it def wasn't that they were talking about doubling matchday revenue, as opposed to total revenue?

Yeah I did think that but I'll wait to see what WM says.

I get that they're saying it, but I'm not sure what evidence that's based on. If it doubled our total revenue we'd be on par with Spurs, which seems a bit unrealistic.