et tu brute

See I don’t call people idiots for not having the same opinion. Grow up.

His forward play is still virtually non existent in both chances created and goals scored and he has been involved in two of the goals conceded in the last two games. I mean someone above was trying to compare his performance yesterday to Kante. Agree all about opinions.

When he actually puts in performances like Kante then come back to me.

It’s got fuck all to do with this performance, it’s two and a half year of absolute shite. Just because he’s making a few more tackles or working harder isn’t going to change that. By the way I think you need to watch how Kante actually plays his role if you want to make comparisons.

I don’t think he should be anywhere near the club never mind the team. As for alternatives they’re virtually non existent either. There is a reason we are in our current position. Problem is going to take three or four transfer windows to resolve. Fortunately we have the owners to make that possible now.

Disagree, but you’re entitled to your opinion.

Sorry disagree, couldn’t give a shit that he’s tackling more or working harder. I look at what he’s producing in the final third and he’s doing virtually nothing. When he actually starts doing that then I will give him credit.

40 million for a player putting himself about a bit more. Not having a go at you, but as an attacking threat he is still virtually non existent.

I just don’t get the current rave about him.. Yes he doesn’t lose the ball as much, but he’s been directly involved in two goals in the last two games. The one against Leicester and the second goal today (yes Shelvey did the back pass but the ball to him should have been played back to the centre half). As an attacking influence he is still virtually non existent also.

I’ve just said that to my nephew

Staveley has already put a shot across the bows with the letter to the other clubs. This will go to the courts (possibly a joint legal submission with Man City) as it’s totally anti-competition and restraint of trade

The problem to me (and I appreciate that people have a soft spot for some of the players I’m going to mention), but we have three players in Max, Almiron and Joelington who cost over 80 million and yet their actual success rate on product created and goals scored is actually very poor. You then also have a non existent central midfield and an atrocious defence. I don’t get this thing about our squad being better than what it’s showing, it’s a very poor squad in my mind and will take a few years to replace nearly all of the players.

I think you can see a mile off why no top club would touch him with a barge pole. His attitude is very questionable to me and he’s certainly not a team player.

Seen nothing to really suggest my initial thoughts that he was totally the wrong manager to appoint in our situation. He’s in place now and has to be given the chance, but just never thought he was the right fit.

I thought people were going over the top last week with what was a pretty average performance, but didn’t want to put a dampener on the positivity. Just can’t see this team staying up.

Yeo totally agree, we don’t want to go for players on the downward slope and giving longish term contracts on massive wages. It’s a very bad business model to go down that road.

From SMB "Their message board was full of stories about Mags getting tickets for their end." Actual facts http://www.shrimpsvoices.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=26730&sid=59564cd7f6cca75d27ea820d007cacd0

It won’t only be the PL it will be the clubs also. Aside from evidence hinted with the CAT hearing, they have already publicly stated about the fact they were not informed of a strictly confidential process involving NDAs and then we also have the other event of holding a meeting between the clubs and purposely not having NUFC in attendance. Charnley has already made a statement to the clubs about their actions being unlawful.

They were the one of the worst teams I’ve ever seen when we beat them 7 - 0 last year

They have a thread on it now . One person pipes up that it may be our fans based on nothing and then it suddenly starts to flood in from others as being fact. “I heard a Geordie accent”, “They were singing songs about cheesy chips”. A person working in the away supporters end says he didn’t hear any Geordie accents and he’s totally ignored. Totally broken they are.

Changed the whole narrative, because he's been made to look stupid now by one of the owners coming out and calling him out

Leicester are a funny team, at times they look very good and yet at other times very average. My big concern is that they will overrun us in midfield. Last season down there for 75 minutes we could have scored 6 or 7, then the last 15 minutes they could have scored 4 or 5 also. I know the defence was better today, but it’s still also very much our Achilles heel. Just got to hope getting the monkey of our back will give the necessary boost.

It would be thrown straight out of court even if they did try - they won't by the way. The anti-competition, the restraint of trade law courts and even the government would have a field day if they even attempted that. Reasonable doubt does not stand up in the courts by the way, they have to have definitive proof that is the case.

Just seen that he's got over 4,000 followers on twitter also! Who the fuck would want to follow this very weird individual?

And the 'financial genius' grumpy cunt had the actual audacity to try and pick holes in our takeover filings.