Jump to content

TheBrownBottle

Member
  • Posts

    17,528
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TheBrownBottle

  1. I don't doubt that 40 to 50 people are being billed against NUFC matters. It is an inefficient state system being tasked with being dynamic - it isn't going to happen. Some of our support seems to still think that they're all hardline business execs.
  2. It is straightforward enough: Isak's transfer fee: 63m Isak's weekly wage (reported): 120k/pw Isak contract length: six years (his signing pre-dates the changes to amortisation, now fixed at five years of the contract regardless of end date) So: 63m / 6 = 10.5m/p.a. amortisation Three years gone = 31.5m remaining 31.5m / 5 = 6.3m 10.5m - 6.3m = 4.2m 4.2m / 52 weeks = 80k / pw additional 'headroom' So NUFC could have taken Isak's wage from 120k / pw to 200k / pw with zero financial impact on the PSR 'bottom line' PS I never said that the contract length wouldn't be changed - it would have to be by necessity. But you absolutely can increase your outgoings and have these offset by a reduction in previous accounting overheads
  3. I worked it out a month or so ago on a previous post, but we could’ve doubled his salary at zero change to PSR Footballers’ contracts are regularly changed with many years left depending on performance - it’s the norm in the industry Centre forwards who score lots of goals usually are the highest paid player at a club. If they want what he would have been earning, then change position and find the net. The match on Saturday served as a reminder of the difference a proper no.9 makes
  4. Tbf we could’ve doubled Isak’s salary and it wouldn’t have moved our PSR headroom
  5. That’s right - and I wonder if Spurs should be a bit concerned that Frank has went in for two former players and they both would rather sign for other clubs - to the extent that Wissa is acting like an arse to get to NUFC …
  6. They do, absolutely - but the potential for dodginess with a manager is far greater I’d think.
  7. Not saying it isn’t true, but surely the PL couldn’t ratify that - there is huge potential for match rigging and all sorts with that kind of deal
  8. Proper fucking weirdo behaviour that by Brentford. The PL is full of absolute hoop-lickers for the Sky Six. I kind of liked them (I’ve got a Brentford-supporting mate who is sound), but I’m increasingly of the view that the quicker the historically second- and third-tier clubs from down south are run out of the league and replaced with traditional big clubs from the north the better it’ll be. At least they might have some fucking pride.
  9. It reads like my old matchday crawl tbh
  10. It wasn’t - a new contract would’ve been PSR-neutral. It was an idiotic decision.
  11. Isak really is one of the thickest cunts in football. What did he think his statement would result in? Looks like we get one more year of him, and with any luck he’s off to the continent next summer. I’ll happily celebrate any and every goal he scores, further cheered that I don’t have to hear that fucking dreadful ‘gimme gimme gimme a striker from Sweden’ dirge after it.
  12. The whole ‘refusal to play’ bullshit just shows what spoiled children most of these cunts are. You’re being asked to play football for 90 mins - it’s hardly a big fucking ask. It’s shite how he’s treated Brentford and this all seems miles away from the supposed ‘no dickheads’ policy.
  13. Haha cheers mate - tbf I keep laughing every time I see my face. Proper Don Corleone bog paper jowls 😁
  14. According the Liverpool Echo piece today, Isak isn’t looking for a move because he’d get paid more money. So we shouldn’t worry about it.
  15. Cheers mate - and that sounds like a nightmare. My bottom two were too deep into the jawline, so to avoid nerve damage they did a coronectomy on each of them, needing to drill the bone away and leaving part of the tooth root in place. I look like I’m storing seeds for winter.
  16. I’ve taken more drugs in the last 24 hours than even the radgiest of NUFC away ends
  17. I kind of like having Mackems in this thread, especially ones who haven’t as yet made lists of NE towns and villages and what % are MLFs and what % should be MLFs
  18. Which is fair enough - and as a general rule I wouldn’t either for most things, but in terms of players / managers / owners shitting on the club, I’d listen to the voices of those going, given that they’re most directly impacted and give up their time and money to do it. I watched the match in a pub on Saturday night and left mildly irritated by a draw which would’ve been a win with a centre forward; if I’d paid my money, went down to Birmingham at stupid o’clock on a Saturday morning and then watched in frustration there’s a good chance I’d have let vent too - and I wouldn’t have needed Bolivian or peeve to make me do it (though I agree it is likely a bit counter-productive). The away end is the vox populi of the club.
  19. Yep - I don’t have a serious issue with Isak wanting to play for a more successful club for more money. But he’s hardly a naive kid - he’s acted like an absolute cunt here.
  20. That’s alright, it’s 4pm over here and I’m at recovering from having all four wisdom teeth pulled yesterday and likely not in a good fettle
  21. It was full of pissheads when I used to be a regular in there, and I don’t remember them all being modest and respectful with it. I get that coked-up wankers are tiresome, but that hardly can be levelled at c.3,000 people in that away end.
  22. The club doesn’t receive any income from away tickets tbf. I’m not sure how much anything was enabled - sure, an empty SJP would be embarrassing for the PL, but I think it’s easy to forget that some folks build their lives around going to the match with their mates. For many it’s their only social outlet - and it’s not about winning, drawing or losing. Going to football is meant to be a bit of fun, after all - I sometimes wonder whether or not I used to take it too seriously. Ashley was a cunt who mishandled the club and insulted us while doing it. Just like pretty much every other cunt who’d run it before him. He bled money from the club - just like his immediate predecessor. Going home and away every week eats up a massive portion of your life - and if they’re completely fucked off with Isak acting like a spoiled greedy little cunt, they absolutely have the right to call that out. If I’m being sober about it, it probably doesn’t help, we would be better off with Isak for another season and Howe hinted at that a little - but it’s their club, and that shouldn’t be forgotten. If I was still a home and away regular, I’m not sure I wouldn’t have expressed exactly the same sentiment.
  23. If you pay your money and spend your time going, then are a proper fan. The more you go, the more seriously your views should be taken for me re how the club is treated by anyone. It’s their club at the end of the day - I stopped going early in the Ashley years, but I’m not going to judge anyone for continuing to go. I still watched every week - I just didn’t get off my arse and it didn’t cost me a penny. I’m not at all comfortable with armchair supporters calling an entire away end cokeheads because they called out Isak’s bullshit behaviour.
×
×
  • Create New...