Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mattoon said:

 

I don't think he's said much wrong, he's entitled to an opinion, whether others like it or not. I also don't think it was misogynistic as he wasn't specifically aiming it at their gender, rather their experience within the game.

 

"Entitled to his opinion" such a crap argument. It's no different to the people who cite a right to 'free speech' when being abusive or offensive.

 

My answer is the same to you as to them - freedom of speech does not entitle you to freedom from consequence of that speech. Keegan has every right to say what he did, but we have every right to judge him for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

 

"Entitled to his opinion" such a crap argument. It's no different to the people who cite a right to 'free speech' when being abusive or offensive.

 

My answer is the same to you as to them - freedom of speech does not entitle you to freedom from consequence of that speech. Keegan has every right to say what he did, but we have every right to judge him for it.

You're not fit to judge  him 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mattoon said:

 

I don't think he's said much wrong, he's entitled to an opinion, whether others like it or not. I also don't think it was misogynistic as he wasn't specifically aiming it at their gender, rather their experience within the game.

 

I thought everyone here would be in a good mood after yesterday, but we're talking about whether women or disabled people should be allowed to comment on football matches?

 

What about managers who never played professionally, is that ok?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, smootsmack said:

 

I thought everyone here would be in a good mood after yesterday, but we're talking about whether women or disabled people should be allowed to comment on football matches?

 

What about managers who never played professionally, is that ok?

 

I'm in a great mood, no one said anyone couldn't commentate on anything, someone said they don't really like it, I couldn't care less who commentates on a game I'm watching so long as it's not Michael Owen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mattoon said:

 

Ad hominem, the argument of the dullard :thup:

 

Just an observation. Not going to engage in an obviously farcical, troll-like debate. What next? Female comedians can't be funny etc.? 

 

 

Edited by elbee909

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MrRaspberryJam said:


He’s liked nowt of mine. Anyone know where Orphanage drinks? Might have to pop in for a chat. 

 

Maybe he's got better judgement than I gave him credit for after all. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:

 

He did, but just because they haven't played in Men's competition doesn't mean their analysis isn't valid. They have experience being in that position against an opposition, its not wild that they might have a relevant opinion on any moment or action.

I love KK but he has a bit of an antiquated view on the matter going off those few lines. But he is 72, so... Not going to change my opinion of him though.

And to an earlier point, not yours btw, about it not being a solution to any problem. It absolutely is, its solves the problem of women not being afforded equal status in a specific role. It solves the problem of women being separated and being seen as less worthy. Which is a problem. You cant accept Andy fucking Hinchcliffe getting commentating gigs and bemoan an England womens internationals getting them. 

could we not combine the men's and women's game? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, elbee909 said:

 

Just an observation. Not going to engage in an obviously farcical, troll-like debate. What next? Female comedians can't be funny etc.? 

 

 

 

 

Not going to engage, promptly engages. I never said anything about women, you're putting words in my mouth. I couldn't care less how other people opine, I'm not going to sit here hand wringing about how someone else feels. It would take a lot more than a controversial opinion for me to dislike Keegan after all he's done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mattoon said:

 

Not going to engage, promptly engages. I never said anything about women, you're putting words in my mouth. I couldn't care less how other people opine, I'm not going to sit here hand wringing about how someone else feels. It would take a lot more than a controversial opinion for me to dislike Keegan after all he's done.

 

I wasn't talking about you in the first place, I was talking about Orphanage!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, no one’s changing their opinion of Keegan. He’d have to kill someone for me to start thinking twice about him. He’s basically my favourite living person that isn’t family or a friend 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pancrate1892 said:

Preference isnt always prejudice. He hasn't indicated anything toxic? 

A preference for the opinion of a man over the opinion of a woman based on nothing other than their sex, which is what was stated, is prejudice and therefore misogynist. How many times does this have to be explained?

 

’I’m not misogynist I just value a man’s opinion more than a woman’s because they’re a woman’ is a contradiction in terms. 
 

Own your misogyny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, elbee909 said:

 

I wasn't talking about you in the first place, I was talking about Orphanage!

 

Fair enough, came straight after my comment so presumed it was aimed at me, apologies if that's not the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, gbandit said:

Also, no one’s changing their opinion of Keegan. He’d have to kill someone for me to start thinking twice about him. He’s basically my favourite living person that isn’t family or a friend 

I’m not changing my opinion of Keegan, although I am undoubtedly entitled to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Mattoon said:

 

I don't think he's said much wrong, he's entitled to an opinion, whether others like it or not. I also don't think it was misogynistic as he wasn't specifically aiming it at their gender, rather their experience within the game.

That's what i think. Yes people can think he's wrong, absolutely, but the whole sanctimonious stance is a bit over the top. 

 

He's not said hes into Hitler

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pancrate1892 said:

That's what i think. Yes people can think he's wrong, absolutely, but the whole sanctimonious stance is a bit over the top. 

 

He's not said hes into Hitler

You’ve proceeded very, very quickly to ‘at least we’re not Nazi’s’, always the sign of a solid argument.

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

 

"Entitled to his opinion" such a crap argument. It's no different to the people who cite a right to 'free speech' when being abusive or offensive.

 

My answer is the same to you as to them - freedom of speech does not entitle you to freedom from consequence of that speech. Keegan has every right to say what he did, but we have every right to judge him for it.

What so your going to just castigate every fucker you don't agree with?? 

If you can't at least drift slightly toward any common ground or impartiality then your never going to be able to be open to debate. 

 

It's a completely narrow minded point of view. At least try and encourage to change people's minds with some good points instead of just saying 'im right and I don't care what you think'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...