Dr Venkman Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy fucking bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? i love it when people attribute all the different views on the forum to the same mind in order to criticise Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 thought Veloso looked excellent for lisbon last year against man utd and rangers, very strong, intelligent, good touch and passing. was anonymous when he played for the under 21s against our lot tho. he doesnt like a player who creates chances but that's not really his job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Veloso has Emre written all over him Talented, great on the ball, but hides in too many games Emre was never great on the ball though, or great at anything come to think of it. Although I quite liked Emre as a player and his style, not suited to the English Premier League though. When we signed him and Parker I thought at last we have the right combo, one that would give us at least 5 years. Funny how things work out. Emre not good on the ball? No, I said not great. Learn to read doilum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy f***ing bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? I'm not saying I wouldn't have Veloso at Newcastle. He'd be an obvious improvement. But I do think he'd be a poor signing for 10-12 million pounds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy f***ing bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? I'm not saying I wouldn't have Veloso at Newcastle. He'd be an obvious improvement. But I do think he'd be a poor signing for 10-12 million pounds. Agree with that. At the moment we cannot afford a 10-12m flop. Would rather spend it on 3 players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy f***ing bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? If we splashed 12m on an unknown and inexperienced player (in terms of the Premiership) I'd question why we never went in for Bullard at half the price but double the Prem experience. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 I've not seen him but on what I've read about i'd prefer us to spunk that on M'Bia, at least he is big,strong,powerful something we badly need. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy f***ing bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? If we splashed 12m on an unknown and inexperienced player (in terms of the Premiership) I'd question why we never went in for Bullard at half the price but double the Prem experience. According to the Journal we wanted him but wouldnt pay his wages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy f***ing bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? If we splashed 12m on an unknown and inexperienced player (in terms of the Premiership) I'd question why we never went in for Bullard at half the price but double the Prem experience. According to the Journal we wanted him but wouldnt pay his wages. And yet we handed both Ameobi and Nicky Butt new deals... It does read there are a lack of savvy business people at Newcastle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy f***ing bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? If we splashed 12m on an unknown and inexperienced player (in terms of the Premiership) I'd question why we never went in for Bullard at half the price but double the Prem experience. According to the Journal we wanted him but wouldnt pay his wages. And yet we handed both Ameobi and Nicky Butt new deals... It does read there are a lack of savvy business people at Newcastle. Yes, but to be fair it was rumoured that Bullard wanted 60k a week would you pay that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Hull City are paying Bullard 60k a week? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Bullard is 31 this year and Hull gave him a 4.5 year contract. I think he's a decent player but considering the deal he clearly wanted I think we've done right not to bother. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy f***ing bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? If we splashed 12m on an unknown and inexperienced player (in terms of the Premiership) I'd question why we never went in for Bullard at half the price but double the Prem experience. According to the Journal we wanted him but wouldnt pay his wages. And yet we handed both Ameobi and Nicky Butt new deals... It does read there are a lack of savvy business people at Newcastle. Yes, but to be fair it was rumoured that Bullard wanted 60k a week would you pay that? I would and I'd offset that by getting rid of Butt and Ameobi and any other dead wood earning a wage all the same. Unfortunetly we'd have a similar situation as the one with Butt and Geremi (high earners, little contributors) a few years down the line with a Bullard, but you take your chance. He's not worth 60K a week of course and its easy to sit here and say yes I would and this is how I'd do it, but these things can be worked out with a bit of savvy and the will to do such business. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Libertine Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy fucking bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? i love it when people attribute all the different views on the forum to the same mind in order to criticise did i say "everyone" anywhere? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 I can't believe i'm reading some of this shite Veloso is the type of player you can build a team around. If we can get him, Abondo and ANother in this transfer window then i'll be quite happy, despite the lack of Shay Given inbetween our goalposts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Bullard is 31 this year and Hull gave him a 4.5 year contract. I think he's a decent player but considering the deal he clearly wanted I think we've done right not to bother. He's 31? I thought he was 28/29 or something. Although he looks about 45 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Hull City are paying Bullard 60k a week? Something like that i think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Bullard is 31 this year and Hull gave him a 4.5 year contract. I think he's a decent player but considering the deal he clearly wanted I think we've done right not to bother. Mental contract Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Can't believe some are turning their noses up at Veloso. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 We'll not get Veloso in a month of sundays. Bet after the window's slammed shut we'll have 1 freebie and 1 loan player in and that's it. 5 Window's now with this lot and nothing amazing has happened in any of them, don't see why people think it's going to change all of a sudden. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Veloso has Emre written all over him Talented, great on the ball, but hides in too many games Emre was never great on the ball though, or great at anything come to think of it. Although I quite liked Emre as a player and his style, not suited to the English Premier League though. When we signed him and Parker I thought at last we have the right combo, one that would give us at least 5 years. Funny how things work out. Emre not good on the ball? No, I said not great. Learn to read doilum. Irrespective of the wording, to say he was anything but great on the ball shows a pure lack of good judgement. He was the one midfielder, I liked and feel comfortable when he was on the ball. Emre's only problem was his poor injury record. He'd walk into our team right now, and was a great player to have on the few times we had him. He had pace strength, and I remember one game in particular against Chelsea at home where he gave Lampard the run around. As I said his problem was staying on the pitch outside of that, he was a damn good midfielder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 I can't believe i'm reading some of this s**** Veloso is the type of player you can build a team around. If we can get him, Abondo and ANother in this transfer window then i'll be quite happy, despite the lack of Shay Given inbetween our goalposts. You can't blame people for being negative man, I mean I imagine most haven't even seen the lad play for a start then there is the Hugo Viana, Luque, Boumsong et al thing and of course, the fact that who the fuck is going to be developing these players and building a team around such a player... err Joe Kinnear! I know, damned if we do, damned if we dont but that's more about the general state of things at the club than anything else. Too many false dawns and hopes... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Libertine Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 people were gutted that we didnt sign jimmy f***ing bullard last week and now a £12 million rated international midfielder isnt good enough for some people? If we splashed 12m on an unknown and inexperienced player (in terms of the Premiership) I'd question why we never went in for Bullard at half the price but double the Prem experience. almost 30, wants £50k-ish a week, decent at best, ugly mother fucker and he chose hull (which shows his ambition is very questionable). JUST the type of player we need more of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 I can't believe i'm reading some of this shite Veloso is the type of player you can build a team around. If we can get him, Abondo and ANother in this transfer window then i'll be quite happy, despite the lack of Shay Given inbetween our goalposts. Ahh but Veloso signing means Shay's going to stay haven't you heard? Vital Footballs the nuts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Can't believe some are turning their noses up at Veloso. Can't believe so many people think that he's a genuine transfer target. It's probably all a crock of shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts