Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mourinho is still the only manager I can think of as having enough talent, experience and ego to take on the Man Utd job after Fergie.

 

Mourinho is almost good enough to merit an interview for the Spurs job.

 

That's how good the bloke is.

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that I think they'd go for either (as they're both too British and not sufficiently European) but Pardew, even on the scant evidence of one season, would probably be a better fit for them than Moyes.

 

Not understood this Moyes talk for both Man Utd and Spurs. I don't see how he fits either at all. Is it all because he's Scottish enough to replace Fergie, and he seems to end up at Spurs quite often on versions of FM?

 

There is no way a manager of the like of Moyes can have a cat's chance in hell of getting a job at Man United these days, because the very minimum they will want is a decent amount of CL experience, and Moyes doesn't have it.

 

 

 

Agree with that, far too much too lose.  Guardiola or Mourinho for me.

 

:thup: It'll be one of the top ones in management, whoever that may be in about 25 fucking years. Moyes certainly doesn't get linked with it as often as he does Spurs. But it still perplexes me as to the amount of sensible, well-spoken football fans I've heard mention Moyes being in line for the Man Utd job.

 

because they're thinking "hey, he's Scottish and dour"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mourinho is still the only manager I can think of as having enough talent, experience and ego to take on the Man Utd job after Fergie.

 

Mourinho is almost good enough to merit an interview for the Spurs job.

 

That's how good the bloke is.

 

It's unlikely a man of his undoubted qualities would be content with a place on the bench while Brad continues for another season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

If moyes doesn't move from Everton soon then people will rightly assume he's just too comfortable in a the Everton job in which he's almost untouchable at.  If he wants to improve his career as a manager then he needs to take a new challenge soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phil Neville 4s for the Everton job. :lol:

 

I never even knew there was a 4. Bloody Nevilles, there's a new fucking model out every year.

 

The Phil Neville 4s is really just the Phil Neville 4 with some pointless voice control shit thrown in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phil Neville 4s for the Everton job. :lol:

 

I never even knew there was a 4. Bloody Nevilles, there's a new fucking model out every year.

 

The Phil Neville 4s is really just the Phil Neville 4 with some pointless voice control shit thrown in.

 

Meanwhile my Gary doesn't get the latest updates despite there being nowt wrong with it. Mind it doesn't really matter, the cunt's in the back of a taxi in Poland somewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The top four was an extreme closed shop for 4 or 5 years. Jol managed to finish 5th two season in a row (one year being extremely unlucky on the final day with half the squad coming down with food poisoning). His net spend during that time was £6 million in '06, £6 million in '05 and £13 million in '04.

 

Then when they stepped their spending up a notch (£40 million in 07) he was given the boot after 2 games of the season. They had Ramos for a year then spent another £40 million in the summer of 08. Redknapp came in and steadied the ship but essentially took over a much improved side from Jol and finished 1 place higher, helped out by Liverpool having an abysmal season compared to the previous 5 years.

 

Not massive progress at all and certainly not done a better job. He's just lucky that that Ramos in between makes him look like he turned round a terrible team when it was anything but.

 

It's all very contradictory.

 

You're bigging up Jol essentially saying he did a great job, then claiming Redknapp didn't do a great job even though he got them finishing higher than Jol evr did doing consistently better.

 

There's nothing flukey about finishing 4th, 5th and 4th aswell as getting to the CL Quarters and a League Cup Final.

 

He got them doing marginally better with a superior squad and far more investment. 5th and 5th with that squad/investment is more impressive than 4th/5th/4th with what Redknapp has been able to work with.

 

Spurs squad between 04-07 is terrible compared to the squad Levy has expensively put together for Arry. The progress is down to bridging the gap financially, nothing more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

The top four was an extreme closed shop for 4 or 5 years. Jol managed to finish 5th two season in a row (one year being extremely unlucky on the final day with half the squad coming down with food poisoning). His net spend during that time was £6 million in '06, £6 million in '05 and £13 million in '04.

 

Then when they stepped their spending up a notch (£40 million in 07) he was given the boot after 2 games of the season. They had Ramos for a year then spent another £40 million in the summer of 08. Redknapp came in and steadied the ship but essentially took over a much improved side from Jol and finished 1 place higher, helped out by Liverpool having an abysmal season compared to the previous 5 years.

 

Not massive progress at all and certainly not done a better job. He's just lucky that that Ramos in between makes him look like he turned round a terrible team when it was anything but.

 

It's all very contradictory.

 

You're bigging up Jol essentially saying he did a great job, then claiming Redknapp didn't do a great job even though he got them finishing higher than Jol evr did doing consistently better.

 

There's nothing flukey about finishing 4th, 5th and 4th aswell as getting to the CL Quarters and a League Cup Final.

 

He got them doing marginally better with a superior squad and far more investment. 5th and 5th with that squad/investment is more impressive than 4th/5th/4th with what Redknapp has been able to work with.

 

Spurs squad between 04-07 is terrible compared to the squad Levy has expensively put together for Arry. The progress is down to bridging the gap financially, nothing more.

 

Also chuck in, when Jol wanted a holding player Comolli went and bought Darren Bent, Jol wasn't choosing the players then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

The top four was an extreme closed shop for 4 or 5 years. Jol managed to finish 5th two season in a row (one year being extremely unlucky on the final day with half the squad coming down with food poisoning). His net spend during that time was £6 million in '06, £6 million in '05 and £13 million in '04.

 

Then when they stepped their spending up a notch (£40 million in 07) he was given the boot after 2 games of the season. They had Ramos for a year then spent another £40 million in the summer of 08. Redknapp came in and steadied the ship but essentially took over a much improved side from Jol and finished 1 place higher, helped out by Liverpool having an abysmal season compared to the previous 5 years.

 

Not massive progress at all and certainly not done a better job. He's just lucky that that Ramos in between makes him look like he turned round a terrible team when it was anything but.

 

It's all very contradictory.

 

You're bigging up Jol essentially saying he did a great job, then claiming Redknapp didn't do a great job even though he got them finishing higher than Jol evr did doing consistently better.

 

There's nothing flukey about finishing 4th, 5th and 4th aswell as getting to the CL Quarters and a League Cup Final.

 

He got them doing marginally better with a superior squad and far more investment. 5th and 5th with that squad/investment is more impressive than 4th/5th/4th with what Redknapp has been able to work with.

 

Spurs squad between 04-07 is terrible compared to the squad Levy has expensively put together for Arry. The progress is down to bridging the gap financially, nothing more.

 

Are you saying that Comolli had a good transfer policy then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

Apparently, Redknapp's compensation is £3,000,000 - £3,000,000 after tax.

 

Well hello Corporal Jones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glory Glory is down, all those home counties Tarquins tugging on their Gauloises and slamming F5, desperate to know whether all the ITKs are agreed.

 

The ITK councils will be gathering around Stonehenge now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Apparently, Redknapp's compensation is £3,000,000 - £3,000,000 after tax.

 

Some welsh twat....

Link to post
Share on other sites

The top four was an extreme closed shop for 4 or 5 years. Jol managed to finish 5th two season in a row (one year being extremely unlucky on the final day with half the squad coming down with food poisoning). His net spend during that time was £6 million in '06, £6 million in '05 and £13 million in '04.

 

Then when they stepped their spending up a notch (£40 million in 07) he was given the boot after 2 games of the season. They had Ramos for a year then spent another £40 million in the summer of 08. Redknapp came in and steadied the ship but essentially took over a much improved side from Jol and finished 1 place higher, helped out by Liverpool having an abysmal season compared to the previous 5 years.

 

Not massive progress at all and certainly not done a better job. He's just lucky that that Ramos in between makes him look like he turned round a terrible team when it was anything but.

 

It's all very contradictory.

 

You're bigging up Jol essentially saying he did a great job, then claiming Redknapp didn't do a great job even though he got them finishing higher than Jol evr did doing consistently better.

 

There's nothing flukey about finishing 4th, 5th and 4th aswell as getting to the CL Quarters and a League Cup Final.

 

He got them doing marginally better with a superior squad and far more investment. 5th and 5th with that squad/investment is more impressive than 4th/5th/4th with what Redknapp has been able to work with.

 

Spurs squad between 04-07 is terrible compared to the squad Levy has expensively put together for Arry. The progress is down to bridging the gap financially, nothing more.

 

Are you saying that Comolli had a good transfer policy then?

 

Not always but they started spending significantly more and as a result the team improved. Even with mistakes this tends to be the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...