Winn Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 MOTD2 have just said Strolla has been technique and feet than Carroll and basiclly that hes a better player... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 ... and we have already dismissed them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Journos reporting Pardew has said he's 50/50 for the mackems game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Good news. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wearside Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Journos reporting Pardew has said he's 50/50 for the mackems game. I hope he plays against us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Journos reporting Pardew has said he's 50/50 for the mackems game. I hope he plays against us. Instead of Shola? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wearside Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Journos reporting Pardew has said he's 50/50 for the mackems game. I hope he plays against us. Instead of Shola? Lets just hope both teams are near enough full strength then neither set of supporters can use excuses post match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveR Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Fair comment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Lets hope he's fully fit. He tore them apart last time, just a shame he couldn't score! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Let's hope this ''injury'' has nothing to do with a potential transfer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlito Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Perhaps Pardew should set Steve Stone on him with a crowbar so he'll fail any potential medical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 As long as Shola's fit against the Mackems we'll be fine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 :lol: What a tool. http://www.comeonspurs.com/columns/10110406.php Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ads Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 :lol: What a tool. http://www.comeonspurs.com/columns/10110406.php Typical Spurs fan. Deluded cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarrovianmag Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3331342/Spurs-in-shock-Andy-Carroll-swoop.html SPURS have made an enquiry for Newcastle striker Andy Carroll. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy contacted Toon officials to ask about the £30million-rated star's availability. Levy was told Carroll was not for sale but that has not put Spurs off and sources say they are ready to test Newcastle with a concrete offer. Tottenham are looking to bid £20m but it is understood Toon will demand at least £30m. Manchester City and Chelsea are also eyeing the striker, who has 11 goals this season. Carroll is out for three weeks with a torn thigh muscle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GeordieBatistuta Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 As one person put it: "I would rather dish out free blow jobs to the homeless than sell Andy Carroll" Brilliant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 'Spurs in shock Carroll swoop' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Because Ashley planned to sell him all along. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 'Spurs in shock Carroll swoop' so is the smiley for cos it's no shock or it's "speculative" ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Because Ashley planned to sell him all along. Obviously. After all 'Mike Ashley is a 'selling' chairman' so says that Spurghs article... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Because Ashley planned to sell him all along. Obviously. After all 'Mike Ashley is a 'selling' chairman' so says that Spurghs article... Who cares about the Spurs article? I feel he'd sell any player to get him off the wage bill and to make a profit. Therefore it's fact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 I feel hes yet to get rid of anyone that didn't need/want to go, therefore its fiction My opinion >Your opinion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Because Ashley planned to sell him all along. Obviously. After all 'Mike Ashley is a 'selling' chairman' so says that Spurghs article... Who cares about the Spurs article? I feel he'd sell any player to get him off the wage bill and to make a profit. Therefore it's fact. whereas i don't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts