Dave Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Want to see him sacked off, can't see it happening. He'll be the type who we keep and see the squad "built around". Krul will be the one to go. In a nutshell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest optimistic nit Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 He's been fine. He saves the shots that he's supposed to save and doesn't save the ones that he's not supposed to save. It's ok. He's an average gk and unless he's on a big wage, I think he's more than good enough for us. Forster and Krul haven't played a competitive football match in over a year, and Krul did it in freakin' Scotland too. I'd rather sell one of the kids (like Forster or Krul, depending on who's worse) and let Harper mentor the better kid. if either of those two is good enough to be our future number 1 they need to play quite a few games next year. if we're not going to blood a keeper in in the championship then he's not going to get his chance in the PL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 I don't know where all of this is coming from. He hasn't been Given, but he's been solid and hasn't dropped any clangers. Tottenham? One contentious mistake since January...nay since slipping over at Anfield? Hardly Hooperesque. Not coming out for Bassong's red card. Not calling and punching for the corner yesterday. Seriously? The ball was at Kamaras feet and he was at least 45 yards from goal. Harper wouldnt have got anywhere near the action, and if he Kamara hadnt went down he would have lobbed him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 Pent up anger at Given's sale means Harper has become Scapegoat One. He's decent enough for the Premiership never mind the Championship. I'd love to keep Krul but not at the expense of a perfectly functional first team keeper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magpie Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 He's nowhere near good enough for the Premiership and in my opinion will struggle in the Championship. Far too sluggish and 'awkward' and well his kicking is just woeful, he expects far too much time to be able to get rid. And I've said that since the day Given left. Got to give Krul a chance or he will be away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulie Walnuts Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 Harper parries the ball too much, which always scares the bejeesus out of me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 His distribution is horribly slow, and the one time he tried it quickly it went horribly wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 At least he doesn't fall asleep mid-goal kick anymore. Would love to see Krul given some time though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leazes1986 Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 I don't understand why people are saying our underperformers aren't good enough for the Championship. Theres hardly anyone in that squad who is League One standard, most of them are more than good enough for that league. Obviously we need to sell because of high wages, people wanting out and to raise funds for the players we want. Theres a huge difference in the quality between the Premiership and Championship. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UV Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 Some stats which are "meaningless" because they consistently show something most don't want to admit: games shots goals shots/goal save % goals/game 06-07 Harper 16.06 72 18 4 75.0 1.12 Given 20.9 98 27 3.63 72.4 1.29 07-08 Harper 19.91 103 28 3.68 72.8 1.41 Given 18.09 91 37 2.46 59.3 2.05 08-09 Harper 16 83 22 3.77 73.5 1.38 Given (NUFC) 22 109 37 2.95 66.1 1.68 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tisd09 Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 I think we have bigger problems than goal keeper. For now I am happy to keep Harper and use Krul as back up. He may not be as good as Shay Given but its nowhere near a problem position for us. He is one of the better keepers in the Championship. It would be good to see Krul given more games next season, maybe he could play all cup games regardless of the opposition? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenige Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 I think we have bigger problems than goal keeper. For now I am happy to keep Harper and use Krul as back up. He may not be as good as Shay Given but its nowhere near a problem position for us. He is one of the better keepers in the Championship. It would be good to see Krul given more games next season, maybe he could play all cup games regardless of the opposition? Hear hear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearer9 Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 I think we have bigger problems than goal keeper. For now I am happy to keep Harper and use Krul as back up. He may not be as good as Shay Given but its nowhere near a problem position for us. He is one of the better keepers in the Championship. It would be good to see Krul given more games next season, maybe he could play all cup games regardless of the opposition? Probably true, we have much bigger fish to fry in the transfer market than goalkeeper. The only possible sticking point is the wages, and if he's as good as people on here seem to think he is, we should be able to get a million quid for him if his wages are untenable. What I would like to see, however, is some sort of long term plan for our next GK. Whether it's Forster, Soderberg, or Krul we need to show that we have some plan for bedding in our next keeper. One day something is gonna happen to Harper and those 3 have I believe 1 first team game between them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karjala Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 As much as i would love to see Krul be our number one next season, theres not a cat in hells chance of Harper leaving. I dont believe Harper is good enough, and certainly not comanding enough as he showed again at Villa. If he hasnt left previously, he certainly aint gonna leave now he's number one. Bet he's gets a decent wedge too as number one, where as Krul will earn significently less. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 May as well give Krul a go, surely if he can survive in the SPL he should be good enough for the Championship. Good opportunity for him to get experience without having to go on loan, ready for our triumphant promotion this time next year! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guinness_fiend Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 May as well give Krul a go, surely if he can survive in the SPL he should be good enough for the Championship. Good opportunity for him to get experience without having to go on loan, ready for our triumphant promotion this time next year! Aside from Rangers and Celtic, I doubt that many SPL teams are anywhere near as strong as the top 10 teams in the Championship. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 Come on people. Harper is more than good enough for the Championship. Seriously, look at some of the keepers who are doing just fine in the division. As for Krul, I'm sure he's a fine prospect but ultimately we have absolutely no evidence that he's ready for first team football other than 90 fantastic minutes against Palermo three years ago. He should have to prove himself like everyone else. We can't just knee-jerk and throw him in over Harper just because he's become everybody's new favorite scapegoat. I'm all for giving him the Cup games regardless of opposition next season, but Harper keeps the number 1 shirt by default unless Krul has an bsolutely mindblowing pre-season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 Come on people. Harper is more than good enough for the Championship. Seriously, look at some of the keepers who are doing just fine in the division. As for Krul, I'm sure he's a fine prospect but ultimately we have absolutely no evidence that he's ready for first team football other than 90 fantastic minutes against Palermo three years ago. He should have to prove himself like everyone else. We can't just knee-jerk and throw him in over Harper just because he's become everybody's new favorite scapegoat. I'm all for giving him the Cup games regardless of opposition next season, but Harper keeps the number 1 shirt by default unless Krul has an bsolutely mindblowing pre-season. Totally agree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 Come on people. Harper is more than good enough for the Championship. Seriously, look at some of the keepers who are doing just fine in the division. As for Krul, I'm sure he's a fine prospect but ultimately we have absolutely no evidence that he's ready for first team football other than 90 fantastic minutes against Palermo three years ago. He should have to prove himself like everyone else. We can't just knee-jerk and throw him in over Harper just because he's become everybody's new favorite scapegoat. I'm all for giving him the Cup games regardless of opposition next season, but Harper keeps the number 1 shirt by default unless Krul has an bsolutely mindblowing pre-season. rational,sensible,non knee -jerk or full of blind prejudice. you've no place on here kidda. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShearMagic Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Come on people. Harper is more than good enough for the Championship. Seriously, look at some of the keepers who are doing just fine in the division. As for Krul, I'm sure he's a fine prospect but ultimately we have absolutely no evidence that he's ready for first team football other than 90 fantastic minutes against Palermo three years ago. He should have to prove himself like everyone else. We can't just knee-jerk and throw him in over Harper just because he's become everybody's new favorite scapegoat. I'm all for giving him the Cup games regardless of opposition next season, but Harper keeps the number 1 shirt by default unless Krul has an bsolutely mindblowing pre-season. Yep. I find it quite bizarre that people are trying to blame Harper? He's not as good as Shay Given, but he's hardly the root of our problem. He'll be one of the better Championship goalkeepers, and there's no need to take the risk of having a relatively unproven, but very promising goalkeeper in there. Harper first choice with Krul as backup is fine IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearer9 Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 I think the #1 shirt should be up for grabs, very clearly, during the preseason. I don't think we should worry about GKs in the transfer market, just keep the ones we have. But Christ, Harper was the man between the sticks for our entire demise, he floundered along with everyone else as we went down without a whimper, there's scant evidence from January onwards that he should keep the #1 shirt by default. I'm not saying get rid, in fact, I think we should keep, but those out there saying he should start on August 8 by default are barking up the wrong tree. Let him wear the shirt if he shows he deserves to keep it over someone else during preseason. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ebolarama Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 We'll never promot Krul. We've got too comfortable with Harper, and we will lose a fine young talent. See if this doesn't happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UV Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 I think the #1 shirt should be up for grabs, very clearly, during the preseason. I don't think we should worry about GKs in the transfer market, just keep the ones we have. But Christ, Harper was the man between the sticks for our entire demise, he floundered along with everyone else as we went down without a whimper, there's scant evidence from January onwards that he should keep the #1 shirt by default. I'm not saying get rid, in fact, I think we should keep, but those out there saying he should start on August 8 by default are barking up the wrong tree. Let him wear the shirt if he shows he deserves to keep it over someone else during preseason. Apart from the evidence that we've always conceded less goals with Harper in net than with Given you mean? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 I agree that the keeper position is not one we need to worry about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 People are missing the point of the OP. Its not that Harper isn't good enough for the championship, or a scapegoat for our relegation or anything, its merely that he is now blocking the club's future. We have a goalkeeper on our books who would have played for either a CL team or a top Dutch team this season had a £3m transfer not been blocked by the board. The choice is between the future and the past, and if we go for the past, we aren't going to see the future, and will have to start looking for a keeper when we come back up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now