afar Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 So the issue with KK quitting or being forced out has nothing to do with the sale of the club? When has that been mentioned in the last couple of pages ? The answer is nowhere. It's just turned into another pro KK anti KK debate. Just because he is in some sort of legal wrangle that has a vague baring on the sale of the club, is a convient excuse for people to start off on their old agenda. I'm sorry, but I'm just sick of people pushing the same message down people's throat, debate about the hear and now, not stuff that's been done to death, over and over again. Of courseits related, people or debating the causes of the sale, sorry if people are sick of this but its one of the most crucial times in the clubs history. You'll know when summik has kicked in when this thread has everyobne posting in it. I give up, you're just not listening. I could easily say the same to you In what way exactly ? You've said it's related and I've countered it's not, and why it's not therefore I clearly listened to your point. However you just repeated what you said and didn't counter my counter, saying this is the most important time for the club. But I'm sorry I don't see a pointless pro KK, anti KK debate being the most important time for the club. Yup, irony indeed. You obviously have no idea about the meaing of the word. Anyway I've allowed this thread to degenerate to even lower levels, so to everyone else having the misfortune of reading this thread, I'm very sorry. So I'm stepping away from it until you children (and I mean that in a mental state, it's not an oppourtunity for you to tell us how old you are and how many games you've seen) are finished with your little debate. Go ahead fill your boots, just let us know when it's safe to return. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
afar Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Happens every so often on here, doesn't it? We're all, to a man or woman, incapable of changing the direction of things now but we've got this pent up frustration and anger about it and for whatever reason we've turned on each other. The last few pages are nothing but cat kicking really, and we've got to find better uses for that energy. Couldn't agree more, and I'm as guilty as the next person. Definately stepping away now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 CHARLES SALE: Fraud probe may force Ashley sale But there is still a rival offer from football entrepreneur Geoff Sheard, who has the backing of a children’s charity foundation. The American directors refute the scepticism of Newcastle’s selling agents Seymour Pierce about their funding capabilities and say Newcastle would not have given them confidential data to analyse if they weren’t considered real contenders. However, the female CEO has yet to meet Ashley Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-1213480/CHARLES-SALE-Fraud-probe-force-Ashley-sale.html#ixzz0R7sltFsq Why the hell would a children's charity buy a football club? Good question. I suppose it's as likely as anything else though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 So the issue with KK quitting or being forced out has nothing to do with the sale of the club? When has that been mentioned in the last couple of pages ? The answer is nowhere. It's just turned into another pro KK anti KK debate. Just because he is in some sort of legal wrangle that has a vague baring on the sale of the club, is a convient excuse for people to start off on their old agenda. I'm sorry, but I'm just sick of people pushing the same message down people's throat, debate about the hear and now, not stuff that's been done to death, over and over again. Of courseits related, people or debating the causes of the sale, sorry if people are sick of this but its one of the most crucial times in the clubs history. You'll know when summik has kicked in when this thread has everyobne posting in it. I give up, you're just not listening. I could easily say the same to you In what way exactly ? You've said it's related and I've countered it's not, and why it's not therefore I clearly listened to your point. However you just repeated what you said and didn't counter my counter, saying this is the most important time for the club. But I'm sorry I don't see a pointless pro KK, anti KK debate being the most important time for the club. Yup, irony indeed. You obviously have no idea about the meaing of the word. Anyway I've allowed this thread to degenerate to even lower levels, so to everyone else having the misfortune of reading this thread, I'm very sorry. So I'm stepping away from it until you children (and I mean that in a mental state, it's not an oppourtunity for you to tell us how old you are and how many games you've seen) are finished with your little debate. Go ahead fill your boots, just let us know when it's safe to return. Mate, you really are confusing me with someone else for whom you hold some irrational hatred. I've never once on this forum or any other mentioned how many games I've been to, nor do I believe I'm in anyway superior to anyone based on anything, let alone based on something as irrelevant as my age. It looks from your post that you are attempting to imply the opposite. Nor do I randomly call people names and/or insult anyone, unlike some others. You should stop making stuff up or show me the posts. Good of you to acknowledge you stepped in with your aggressive tone and ruined what was an interesting couple of pages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Happens every so often on here, doesn't it? We're all, to a man or woman, incapable of changing the direction of things now but we've got this pent up frustration and anger about it and for whatever reason we've turned on each other. The last few pages are nothing but cat kicking really, and we've got to find better uses for that energy. Good post and very true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Five o Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 CHARLES SALE: Fraud probe may force Ashley sale But there is still a rival offer from football entrepreneur Geoff Sheard, who has the backing of a children’s charity foundation. The American directors refute the scepticism of Newcastle’s selling agents Seymour Pierce about their funding capabilities and say Newcastle would not have given them confidential data to analyse if they weren’t considered real contenders. However, the female CEO has yet to meet Ashley Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-1213480/CHARLES-SALE-Fraud-probe-force-Ashley-sale.html#ixzz0R7sltFsq Why the hell would a children's charity buy a football club? Good question. I suppose it's as likely as anything else though. But i cant see how they are allowed to do it, isn't (charity) foundations supposed to me non profit organizations? (Correct me if i`m dead wrong) Its utter bullshait imo If the world freezes over, and they somehow pushes trough, it will be to sell in the summer to cash in some money, without investing a great deal.... Do we want it, i think not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Trouble is, the Keegan issue is closely linked with the ownership issue, even now. It was Keegan's walkout and the aftermath which initially prompted Ashley to try and sell, and the ensuing instability led to relegation. It's the fact that so many fans hold Ashley entirely responsible for this mess that has led to him baling out. His handling of the Keegan situation is the main reason why his competence and suitability for ownership is held in question by so many. However, I do feel that the longer the current situation carries on, the less sense it makes for Ashley to go. The only interest has been shown by people who clearly don't have anything like Ashley's financial muscle. The pressure for Ashley to go often feels like his punishment rather than a rational step. Are we really going to better off in the long term under a cash-strapped local businessman? I know it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere, but I'd have rather seen Ashley given the chance to learn from his mistakes and carry on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago_shearer Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 CHARLES SALE: Fraud probe may force Ashley sale But there is still a rival offer from football entrepreneur Geoff Sheard, who has the backing of a children’s charity foundation. The American directors refute the scepticism of Newcastle’s selling agents Seymour Pierce about their funding capabilities and say Newcastle would not have given them confidential data to analyse if they weren’t considered real contenders. However, the female CEO has yet to meet Ashley Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-1213480/CHARLES-SALE-Fraud-probe-force-Ashley-sale.html#ixzz0R7sltFsq The Daily Mail. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfrederi Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Trouble is, the Keegan issue is closely linked with the ownership issue, even now. It was Keegan's walkout and the aftermath which initially prompted Ashley to try and sell, and the ensuing instability led to relegation. It's the fact that so many fans hold Ashley entirely responsible for this mess that has led to him baling out. His handling of the Keegan situation is the main reason why his competence and suitability for ownership is held in question by so many. However, I do feel that the longer the current situation carries on, the less sense it makes for Ashley to go. The only interest has been shown by people who clearly don't have anything like Ashley's financial muscle. The pressure for Ashley to go often feels like his punishment rather than a rational step. Are we really going to better off in the long term under a cash-strapped local businessman? I know it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere, but I'd have rather seen Ashley given the chance to learn from his mistakes and carry on. Did he not have such an opportunity in May but decided to put the club up for sale yet again making the same old mistakes and if the clubs not sold soon have we just more of the same from him to look forward to in January/Summer 2010? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Trouble is, the Keegan issue is closely linked with the ownership issue, even now. It was Keegan's walkout and the aftermath which initially prompted Ashley to try and sell, and the ensuing instability led to relegation. It's the fact that so many fans hold Ashley entirely responsible for this mess that has led to him baling out. His handling of the Keegan situation is the main reason why his competence and suitability for ownership is held in question by so many. However, I do feel that the longer the current situation carries on, the less sense it makes for Ashley to go. The only interest has been shown by people who clearly don't have anything like Ashley's financial muscle. The pressure for Ashley to go often feels like his punishment rather than a rational step. Are we really going to better off in the long term under a cash-strapped local businessman? I know it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere, but I'd have rather seen Ashley given the chance to learn from his mistakes and carry on. Did he not have such an opportunity in May but decided to put the club up for sale yet again making the same old mistakes and if the clubs not sold soon have we just more of the same from him to look forward to in January/Summer 2010? Ashley is never going to invest in the team. He needs to go as quickly as possible Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
quayside Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Trouble is, the Keegan issue is closely linked with the ownership issue, even now. It was Keegan's walkout and the aftermath which initially prompted Ashley to try and sell, and the ensuing instability led to relegation. It's the fact that so many fans hold Ashley entirely responsible for this mess that has led to him baling out. His handling of the Keegan situation is the main reason why his competence and suitability for ownership is held in question by so many. However, I do feel that the longer the current situation carries on, the less sense it makes for Ashley to go. The only interest has been shown by people who clearly don't have anything like Ashley's financial muscle. The pressure for Ashley to go often feels like his punishment rather than a rational step. Are we really going to better off in the long term under a cash-strapped local businessman? I know it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere, but I'd have rather seen Ashley given the chance to learn from his mistakes and carry on. Did he not have such an opportunity in May but decided to put the club up for sale yet again making the same old mistakes and if the clubs not sold soon have we just more of the same from him to look forward to in January/Summer 2010? Ashley is never going to invest in the team. He needs to go as quickly as possible Someone should let him know and I'm sure he'll do the decent and and proper thing.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikri Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Trouble is, the Keegan issue is closely linked with the ownership issue, even now. It was Keegan's walkout and the aftermath which initially prompted Ashley to try and sell, and the ensuing instability led to relegation. It's the fact that so many fans hold Ashley entirely responsible for this mess that has led to him baling out. His handling of the Keegan situation is the main reason why his competence and suitability for ownership is held in question by so many. However, I do feel that the longer the current situation carries on, the less sense it makes for Ashley to go. The only interest has been shown by people who clearly don't have anything like Ashley's financial muscle. The pressure for Ashley to go often feels like his punishment rather than a rational step. Are we really going to better off in the long term under a cash-strapped local businessman? I know it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere, but I'd have rather seen Ashley given the chance to learn from his mistakes and carry on. Did he not have such an opportunity in May but decided to put the club up for sale yet again making the same old mistakes and if the clubs not sold soon have we just more of the same from him to look forward to in January/Summer 2010? Ashley is never going to invest in the team. He needs to go as quickly as possible Someone should let him know and I'm sure he'll do the the decent and and proper thing.... http://chattahbox.com/images/2009/03/hari-kari.jpg ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
quayside Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Trouble is, the Keegan issue is closely linked with the ownership issue, even now. It was Keegan's walkout and the aftermath which initially prompted Ashley to try and sell, and the ensuing instability led to relegation. It's the fact that so many fans hold Ashley entirely responsible for this mess that has led to him baling out. His handling of the Keegan situation is the main reason why his competence and suitability for ownership is held in question by so many. However, I do feel that the longer the current situation carries on, the less sense it makes for Ashley to go. The only interest has been shown by people who clearly don't have anything like Ashley's financial muscle. The pressure for Ashley to go often feels like his punishment rather than a rational step. Are we really going to better off in the long term under a cash-strapped local businessman? I know it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere, but I'd have rather seen Ashley given the chance to learn from his mistakes and carry on. Did he not have such an opportunity in May but decided to put the club up for sale yet again making the same old mistakes and if the clubs not sold soon have we just more of the same from him to look forward to in January/Summer 2010? Ashley is never going to invest in the team. He needs to go as quickly as possible Someone should let him know and I'm sure he'll do the the decent and and proper thing.... http://chattahbox.com/images/2009/03/hari-kari.jpg ? Although its possible Ashley might not see it that way tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macca888 Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 HTL and NG Looks like there has been further interesting discussion overnight (aussie time) that I missed. Firstly, I was interested in HTLs comments about the feeling of the place. Whilst I agree to a certain extent, that being closer to the source of a problem, can enlighten issues further, in the times of modern technology, this does not really apply any longer, especially at NUFC. I would think that 99.9% of supporters living in and around Tyneside are just as much left in the dark about the problems associated with the club over the past 12 months as us supporters far away. Secondly, having followed the club for more years than I can remember and having connections with the club since I was a youngster, people might be a little surprised at who and what some of us supporters far away might know. It would be very foolish to suppose that we know noithing, just because we are 10,000 miles away. Thirdly, whilst this has been an excellent discussion in my opinion, although sometimes degenerating to name calling, there should be a mutual respect by all concerned at the opinions of others without resorting to name calling. It would lead to better discussion and understanding of the situation and viewpoints of all concerned. Those who find the discussion boring, can move on to other threads without commenting. Finally, I apologise if some on here feel that what I say is meant to look like the truth, the whole truth and nothong but the truth. It is my opinions, based on information, readily available and some information accessed privately, resulting in what I believe to be a fair appraisal of the entire situation. I dont expect everyone to agree with my opinions but for what it is worth, it has lead to an interesting discussion with several people on here who have the interests of the club at heart, whether these people be in Gosforth, Yorkshire or Melbourne. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted September 15, 2009 Share Posted September 15, 2009 Yes we can! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 Yes we can! No we can't ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowie Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 This is a few pages longer than the last time i checked, is it worth reading or is it just the usual drivel? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 I agree that too many people on here have looked upon Keegan as a God for too long, based purely on his 5 years period in the 90s when he spent just as much, if not more, than other managers around at the time. That was all history when he came back. Whether Ashley has gone back on promises to KK or not, is immaterial in this discussion. As some once else pointed out earlier in this thread, how many other managers would have spat the dummy because he couldnt get the owner to buy him a left back? I would say, virtually none. I dont buy the argument from KK about Denis Wise involvement either. As far as I recall, KK admitted he knew Wise was going to be appointed before he came back. I have no doubts at all that Keegan's ego mplayed a huge part in this whole saga and the biggest mistake Ashley made was appointing a so called fans favourite who would ultimately use his popularity with the fans to try and gain the ascendancy in the club. Lets be honest here, whereever Keegan has gone in the past, he has not been able to operate without substantial funds and it has been clear for long enough now that the financial state of the club, even before Keegan came back, has been horrendous and needed to be addressed without any further financial deterioration. Keegan wanted his slice, the club could not afford it, Keegan spat his usual dummy and now, we are paying for the consequences. I hope Ashley wins his case againast Keegan, because KK neither deserves or warrants any financial compensation for his role in this whole saga. He should be ashamed of himself. a real bloody con man, if ever I saw one. AND YOU SUPPORTERS MAY HAVE TO PAY FOR IT. More tripe. Your far flung location sees you detached from reality but really, there is no excuse given the power of the internet. When Keegan was appointed by fat ash the reality is that people saw him as a manager with some talent who may turn the team into a decent one and who may see us up near the top 6 or so and looking like challengers. Babbling on the way you do about Keegan being seen as a god or something merely goes to show your knowledge of the club and it's supporters is limited to what you read in the media. Love the reference to YOU SUPPORTERS by the way. That tells a story. I suggest you stick to stuff about australia and leave the Newcastle stuff to those more clued up. A rather angry and irrational response which rather confirms what macca was saying. Keegan has a status which, in many people's eyes, puts him beyond criticism. I've lost count of the number of times I've seen him described as a 'legend'. I've also found that when you criticise the man, the response is often one of moral outrage, as though you'd pissed on the steps of the Vatican rather than made an observation about a human being who is as flawed as the rest of us. Not his first though, is it? Anyone who doesn't agree with him is talking 'tripe' and anyone who lives in Australia (including myself), has to bow to his superior knowledge of all things NUFC. What a wonderful person to go for a pint before the match with Can't say I've ever noticed you. Who are you? You won't know this, but people who go to the match disagree, so disagreeing with someone is nowt to do with whether or not someone like you or your mate are in australia, it's more to do with the content of posts made, which exhibit a huge degree of ignorance....or tripe, about Newcastle United. Sorry, didn't realise that I needed to have over 100 posts to disagree with you (which we have done in the past over Shepherd). Please let us know your recognition scheme in the future. The bit in bold...you're making yourself look a bit more of a prick now, you see, I only moved to Australia in Jan this year and had been going to the matches since '82, So I know all about disagreeing, just not in your usual way of completely putting down the other persons point of view. If it's got nowt to do with macca being in Australia, why did you bring it up and use it against him? I'll not be expecting a straight answer. f***ing loon. You again. Mate, I've said nowt about 100 posts. Making stuff up is a bad sign. If you've been going to matches since 1982 and have recently moved to australia I'm sure you will agree it's much more difficult to maintain a decent grip on what is happening in Newcastle. Macca has lived in australia for years, my point is that he does not have a proper idea of "the feeling" about the club, Ashley or Keegan and it comes across in the content of his posts. His view is based on incomplete information and that is due in some measure to his location. That you find it insulting that I mention is a laugh. Are you going to claim someone on the other side of Planet Earth has the same "feel" for what is happening in Newcastle as those living there or going there on a regular basis? I've lived abroad as well, so think carefully before you reply. You lied at the top of your last post so I won't be surprised if you do so again. I'm thinking carefully and did not lie. I don't think it's hard to keep up to date. I have the internet, lots of mates who go and watch the matches. Apologies for not actually being 'there' and having the 'feeling'. You're talking tripe now. Mate, You completely misunderstand. You don't need to apologise to me for anything, let alone for not going to matches, for not being "there" and for not having the "feeling". I don't give a s**** what you think. Why are you replying then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 Trouble is, the Keegan issue is closely linked with the ownership issue, even now. It was Keegan's walkout and the aftermath which initially prompted Ashley to try and sell, and the ensuing instability led to relegation. It's the fact that so many fans hold Ashley entirely responsible for this mess that has led to him baling out. His handling of the Keegan situation is the main reason why his competence and suitability for ownership is held in question by so many. However, I do feel that the longer the current situation carries on, the less sense it makes for Ashley to go. The only interest has been shown by people who clearly don't have anything like Ashley's financial muscle. The pressure for Ashley to go often feels like his punishment rather than a rational step. Are we really going to better off in the long term under a cash-strapped local businessman? I know it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere, but I'd have rather seen Ashley given the chance to learn from his mistakes and carry on. Nice sentiment, but given the numerous mistakes I'd suggest Ashley doesn't even recognise when he's made one, let alone learn from it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 HTL and NG Looks like there has been further interesting discussion overnight (aussie time) that I missed. Firstly, I was interested in HTLs comments about the feeling of the place. Whilst I agree to a certain extent, that being closer to the source of a problem, can enlighten issues further, in the times of modern technology, this does not really apply any longer, especially at NUFC. I would think that 99.9% of supporters living in and around Tyneside are just as much left in the dark about the problems associated with the club over the past 12 months as us supporters far away. Secondly, having followed the club for more years than I can remember and having connections with the club since I was a youngster, people might be a little surprised at who and what some of us supporters far away might know. It would be very foolish to suppose that we know noithing, just because we are 10,000 miles away. Thirdly, whilst this has been an excellent discussion in my opinion, although sometimes degenerating to name calling, there should be a mutual respect by all concerned at the opinions of others without resorting to name calling. It would lead to better discussion and understanding of the situation and viewpoints of all concerned. Those who find the discussion boring, can move on to other threads without commenting. Finally, I apologise if some on here feel that what I say is meant to look like the truth, the whole truth and nothong but the truth. It is my opinions, based on information, readily available and some information accessed privately, resulting in what I believe to be a fair appraisal of the entire situation. I dont expect everyone to agree with my opinions but for what it is worth, it has lead to an interesting discussion with several people on here who have the interests of the club at heart, whether these people be in Gosforth, Yorkshire or Melbourne. Ian I've nowt against you mate. If you were across here I'd be quite happy to buy you a beer. That's for one. Second, I am not in the least bothered by the location of anybody, despite the comment by your "mate" earlier on. I think it's difficult for someone to get a real feel for what is going on from so far away. You disagree and you're entitled to that. I think you're wrong and I'm entitled to that. I also don't live in Newcastle and haven't done for years, I think that makes it difficult for me, despite technology. It is not the same as being there all the time. I didn't say you know nowt. I have respect for most people and that includes you, there are only a couple I find myself laughing at before I've even read what they post. That may not be fair, but it's the truth and as there are only a couple from the huge number of members, I'd suggest it's down to them and what they've posted in the past. The thing about posts you make, and those of some others who have an irrational hatred for Keegan and Fred, is what seems to be the outright lies used in attempt to justify the hatred. When people respond with genuine information to dispute the lies, the posts are ignored completely, there is no "debate." An example of this in my view is the repeated reference over the years to Keegan throwing away a 12 point lead. This is a media myth, yet you and others continue to peddle this myth as though it's fact. You've repeated this myth a number of times now to the point it can seem to be one of your major gripes with Keegan, yet it's not even true. There is one member continually moaning about Fred spending too much money on players then also moans about the club not lashing out millions in summer 2003, having spent over £40million in the previous two years, or whatever time period it was. It's rather pathetic and it's this kind of stuff that leads to a lack of respect and kills debate in my opinion. Finally, I don't resort to name-calling either, that's the thing for some other members but not me. I'm dropping it now, so cheers anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 I agree that too many people on here have looked upon Keegan as a God for too long, based purely on his 5 years period in the 90s when he spent just as much, if not more, than other managers around at the time. That was all history when he came back. Whether Ashley has gone back on promises to KK or not, is immaterial in this discussion. As some once else pointed out earlier in this thread, how many other managers would have spat the dummy because he couldnt get the owner to buy him a left back? I would say, virtually none. I dont buy the argument from KK about Denis Wise involvement either. As far as I recall, KK admitted he knew Wise was going to be appointed before he came back. I have no doubts at all that Keegan's ego mplayed a huge part in this whole saga and the biggest mistake Ashley made was appointing a so called fans favourite who would ultimately use his popularity with the fans to try and gain the ascendancy in the club. Lets be honest here, whereever Keegan has gone in the past, he has not been able to operate without substantial funds and it has been clear for long enough now that the financial state of the club, even before Keegan came back, has been horrendous and needed to be addressed without any further financial deterioration. Keegan wanted his slice, the club could not afford it, Keegan spat his usual dummy and now, we are paying for the consequences. I hope Ashley wins his case againast Keegan, because KK neither deserves or warrants any financial compensation for his role in this whole saga. He should be ashamed of himself. a real bloody con man, if ever I saw one. AND YOU SUPPORTERS MAY HAVE TO PAY FOR IT. More tripe. Your far flung location sees you detached from reality but really, there is no excuse given the power of the internet. When Keegan was appointed by fat ash the reality is that people saw him as a manager with some talent who may turn the team into a decent one and who may see us up near the top 6 or so and looking like challengers. Babbling on the way you do about Keegan being seen as a god or something merely goes to show your knowledge of the club and it's supporters is limited to what you read in the media. Love the reference to YOU SUPPORTERS by the way. That tells a story. I suggest you stick to stuff about australia and leave the Newcastle stuff to those more clued up. A rather angry and irrational response which rather confirms what macca was saying. Keegan has a status which, in many people's eyes, puts him beyond criticism. I've lost count of the number of times I've seen him described as a 'legend'. I've also found that when you criticise the man, the response is often one of moral outrage, as though you'd pissed on the steps of the Vatican rather than made an observation about a human being who is as flawed as the rest of us. Not his first though, is it? Anyone who doesn't agree with him is talking 'tripe' and anyone who lives in Australia (including myself), has to bow to his superior knowledge of all things NUFC. What a wonderful person to go for a pint before the match with Can't say I've ever noticed you. Who are you? You won't know this, but people who go to the match disagree, so disagreeing with someone is nowt to do with whether or not someone like you or your mate are in australia, it's more to do with the content of posts made, which exhibit a huge degree of ignorance....or tripe, about Newcastle United. Sorry, didn't realise that I needed to have over 100 posts to disagree with you (which we have done in the past over Shepherd). Please let us know your recognition scheme in the future. The bit in bold...you're making yourself look a bit more of a prick now, you see, I only moved to Australia in Jan this year and had been going to the matches since '82, So I know all about disagreeing, just not in your usual way of completely putting down the other persons point of view. If it's got nowt to do with macca being in Australia, why did you bring it up and use it against him? I'll not be expecting a straight answer. f***ing loon. You again. Mate, I've said nowt about 100 posts. Making stuff up is a bad sign. If you've been going to matches since 1982 and have recently moved to australia I'm sure you will agree it's much more difficult to maintain a decent grip on what is happening in Newcastle. Macca has lived in australia for years, my point is that he does not have a proper idea of "the feeling" about the club, Ashley or Keegan and it comes across in the content of his posts. His view is based on incomplete information and that is due in some measure to his location. That you find it insulting that I mention is a laugh. Are you going to claim someone on the other side of Planet Earth has the same "feel" for what is happening in Newcastle as those living there or going there on a regular basis? I've lived abroad as well, so think carefully before you reply. You lied at the top of your last post so I won't be surprised if you do so again. I'm thinking carefully and did not lie. I don't think it's hard to keep up to date. I have the internet, lots of mates who go and watch the matches. Apologies for not actually being 'there' and having the 'feeling'. You're talking tripe now. Mate, You completely misunderstand. You don't need to apologise to me for anything, let alone for not going to matches, for not being "there" and for not having the "feeling". I don't give a s**** what you think. Why are you replying then? omg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 Trouble is, the Keegan issue is closely linked with the ownership issue, even now. It was Keegan's walkout and the aftermath which initially prompted Ashley to try and sell, and the ensuing instability led to relegation. It's the fact that so many fans hold Ashley entirely responsible for this mess that has led to him baling out. His handling of the Keegan situation is the main reason why his competence and suitability for ownership is held in question by so many. However, I do feel that the longer the current situation carries on, the less sense it makes for Ashley to go. The only interest has been shown by people who clearly don't have anything like Ashley's financial muscle. The pressure for Ashley to go often feels like his punishment rather than a rational step. Are we really going to better off in the long term under a cash-strapped local businessman? I know it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere, but I'd have rather seen Ashley given the chance to learn from his mistakes and carry on. I'd say the build up to and our relegation from the Premiership was far more of a reason. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 Trouble is, the Keegan issue is closely linked with the ownership issue, even now. It was Keegan's walkout and the aftermath which initially prompted Ashley to try and sell, and the ensuing instability led to relegation. It's the fact that so many fans hold Ashley entirely responsible for this mess that has led to him baling out. His handling of the Keegan situation is the main reason why his competence and suitability for ownership is held in question by so many. However, I do feel that the longer the current situation carries on, the less sense it makes for Ashley to go. The only interest has been shown by people who clearly don't have anything like Ashley's financial muscle. The pressure for Ashley to go often feels like his punishment rather than a rational step. Are we really going to better off in the long term under a cash-strapped local businessman? I know it's unrealistic in the current atmosphere, but I'd have rather seen Ashley given the chance to learn from his mistakes and carry on. I'd say the build up to and our relegation from the Premiership was far more of a reason. Surely not. How can that be? The one and only reason is obviously his treatment of God, nobody really cares much about the club ahead of the Messiah, after all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 Ashley's had two chances to learn from his mistakes, and failed miserably with both. The first one was last September he could have admitted he ballsed up, got rid of Wise, and either restored Keegan or a full-time manager (like Spurs did with Ramos, got rid of Comolli and brought in Redknapp), and even after relegation he could have held his hands up and admitted his mistakes, and committed to getting us up by giving Shearer the job...he didn't do that either and instead put us up for sale again. There's no chance he'll run this club like a proper owner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 Ashley's had two chances to learn from his mistakes, and failed miserably with both. The first one was last September he could have admitted he ballsed up, got rid of Wise, and either restored Keegan or a full-time manager (like Spurs did with Ramos, got rid of Comolli and brought in Redknapp), and even after relegation he could have held his hands up and admitted his mistakes, and committed to getting us up by giving Shearer the job...he didn't do that either and instead put us up for sale again. There's no chance he'll run this club like a proper owner. I think his inactivity after JFK's heart attack is one of the key mistakes he made. We were allowed to meander along for far too long without leadership before he acted, and dropped too many points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts