stalker Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Out of interest does anyone believe a word of the 5 consortium stuff? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Out of interest does anyone believe a word of the 5 consortium stuff? press association ain't exactly bullshitters Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UV Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Anyone still blaming Keegan for walking out on this sheister is beyond reason tbh. Didn't just walk out on him tbh, walked out on us. Should have just went public with the story then Ashley would have had to either fire him or back him. Anyone with any sense would blame Keegan as well as Ashley. The above response spells out what he should have done. I know how much I love this club, Keegan says he loves this club, I know that I would NOT have done what he did and would have done something like what is suggested above. Someone who loved the club and the city and the supporters (in his position) would do a MILLION things, would do ANYTHING . . . rather than walk out on the club and supporters so soon after he came back to 'finish unfinished business'. I know that genuinly blind and almost obsessed Keegan lovers CAN NOT accept that he is even partially to blame. They just never will, which is a shame. If Keegan had of waited until he was sacked, he would have been entitled to even more money !!!! And you would have still been having a go at him for that as well, how about looking at Ashleys part for putting Keegan in the postion where he had to do what he did ? Why?? We all know that Ashley is to blame for this . . . THAT is not at issue. What IS at issue is that there are some people who do not think that Keegan shares some of the blame. I repeat (!!!) he should not have resigned, he should have done what has been suggested - if he really loved the club as he says he does. So you accept that Ashely forced Keegan to walk by lying and undermining him on transfers, but Keegan should have stuck it out and waited for a even bigger fat wedge for getting sacked !!!! Have i got this right, because if i have then that would have been even worse for the club. As it stands he got a small payout (how much did fat sam get for getting sacked) and shown to the world how badly Ashley has been running this club. Keegan should not have done what he did when he did it. There are no further add-ons, assumptions, perspectives, variations etc, etc, to what I say, nothing about pay-offs in the (then) future - NOTHING. JUST - Keegan should not have left when he did. That is it!! Of course. He should have stayed on as a disgruntled employee boosting morale by letting everyone know he wasn't in charge of signing the new players and slagging off Wise & Lllambias in the press until he was eventually sacked for it. Things would have been so much better. If only... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Out of interest does anyone believe a word of the 5 consortium stuff? press association ain't exactly bullshitters But they will be being fed by the same sources as the Times, Mirror etc.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Out of interest does anyone believe a word of the 5 consortium stuff? press association ain't exactly bullshitters But they will be being fed by the same sources as the Times, Mirror etc.... and usually thats not from the ashley point of view as simon bird and caulkin are both harsh critics of him. Ashley slanted "exclusives" tend to appear in the news of the world and the sun (see llambias interview during summer, what keegan was suing for recently in the sun, keegans "wish list" in notw last year Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stalker Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Out of interest does anyone believe a word of the 5 consortium stuff? press association ain't exactly bullshitters But they will be being fed by the same sources as the Times, Mirror etc.... and usually thats not from the ashley point of view as simon bird and caulkin are both harsh critics of him. Ashley slanted "exclusives" tend to appear in the news of the world and the sun (see llambias interview during summer, what keegan was suing for recently in the sun, keegans "wish list" in notw last year you being serious? you reference the 2 national journalists who actually like Newcastle as a club and say therefore the press association won't be fed Ashley's bollocks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Out of interest does anyone believe a word of the 5 consortium stuff? press association ain't exactly bullshitters But they will be being fed by the same sources as the Times, Mirror etc.... and usually thats not from the ashley point of view as simon bird and caulkin are both harsh critics of him. Ashley slanted "exclusives" tend to appear in the news of the world and the sun (see llambias interview during summer, what keegan was suing for recently in the sun, keegans "wish list" in notw last year you being serious? you reference the 2 national journalists who actually like Newcastle as a club and say therefore the press association won't be fed Ashley's bollocks and are you being serious with the outcome of the keegan case showing them as a bunch of liars that any press organisation with a shred of dignity would take anything that comes from the ashley regime as anything other than a bunch of self serving lies Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stalker Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Out of interest does anyone believe a word of the 5 consortium stuff? press association ain't exactly bullshitters But they will be being fed by the same sources as the Times, Mirror etc.... and usually thats not from the ashley point of view as simon bird and caulkin are both harsh critics of him. Ashley slanted "exclusives" tend to appear in the news of the world and the sun (see llambias interview during summer, what keegan was suing for recently in the sun, keegans "wish list" in notw last year you being serious? you reference the 2 national journalists who actually like Newcastle as a club and say therefore the press association won't be fed Ashley's bollocks and are you being serious with the outcome of the keegan case showing them as a bunch of liars that any press organisation with a shred of dignity would take anything that comes from the ashley regime as anything other than a bunch of self serving lies Skysports gave the man at the centre of it all the chance to "give his side of the story" without the slightest bit of interrogation, not sure I can hold the press association in any higher regard. After all a source is a source to them, at least its better than making them up as many of the papers seem to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Out of interest does anyone believe a word of the 5 consortium stuff? press association ain't exactly bullshitters But they will be being fed by the same sources as the Times, Mirror etc.... and usually thats not from the ashley point of view as simon bird and caulkin are both harsh critics of him. Ashley slanted "exclusives" tend to appear in the news of the world and the sun (see llambias interview during summer, what keegan was suing for recently in the sun, keegans "wish list" in notw last year you being serious? you reference the 2 national journalists who actually like Newcastle as a club and say therefore the press association won't be fed Ashley's bollocks and are you being serious with the outcome of the keegan case showing them as a bunch of liars that any press organisation with a shred of dignity would take anything that comes from the ashley regime as anything other than a bunch of self serving lies Skysports gave the man at the centre of it all the chance to "give his side of the story" without the slightest bit of interrogation, not sure I can hold the press association in any higher regard. After all a source is a source to them, at least its better than making them up as many of the papers seem to. skysports are just interested in getting more viewers on and with keegan haven given his side on espn they may have felt they needed to match that by getting wise to give his side Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timnufc22 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Out of interest does anyone believe a word of the 5 consortium stuff? press association ain't exactly bullshitters But they will be being fed by the same sources as the Times, Mirror etc.... and usually thats not from the ashley point of view as simon bird and caulkin are both harsh critics of him. Ashley slanted "exclusives" tend to appear in the news of the world and the sun (see llambias interview during summer, what keegan was suing for recently in the sun, keegans "wish list" in notw last year you being serious? you reference the 2 national journalists who actually like Newcastle as a club and say therefore the press association won't be fed Ashley's bollocks and are you being serious with the outcome of the keegan case showing them as a bunch of liars that any press organisation with a shred of dignity would take anything that comes from the ashley regime as anything other than a bunch of self serving lies Skysports gave the man at the centre of it all the chance to "give his side of the story" without the slightest bit of interrogation, not sure I can hold the press association in any higher regard. After all a source is a source to them, at least its better than making them up as many of the papers seem to. skysports are just interested in getting more viewers on and with keegan haven given his side on espn they may have felt they needed to match that by getting wise to give his side The disgusting thing about that, was that the facts were out in the public domain. They talked to Wise, even laughed about what had went on, under a context that suggested the facts wernt out there. Slimy, soul-less arseholes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dover Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Two consortium meeting Ashley in London tonight They have access to Saudi millions They will install Shearer as manager Mort returning as chairman Deal should be done by Monday I cant reveal my sources but I can at 11.03am on Monday believe me if you want there im an itk now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 The papers will print whatever they 'hear', it doesn't fucking matter that some of them are also sympathetic towards us in opinion pieces. I think this 'five in talks' thing is utter bollocks. If I had to guess I'd say Moat's is the only bid on the table and Ashley doesn't want to accept it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Who are the 23 mentlers that want Mike Ashley to stay? Crazy folk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Two consortium meeting Ashley in London tonight They have access to Saudi millions They will install Shearer as manager Mort returning as chairman Deal should be done by Monday I cant reveal my sources but I can at 11.03am on Monday believe me if you want there im an itk now If you telling fibs, i'm gonna chuck you over the cliffs of dover Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Who are the 23 mentlers that want Mike Ashley to stay? Crazy folk It's manor park, jsut keeps clearing his cookies to vote again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Probably covert mackems Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gleebals Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Two consortium meeting Ashley in London tonight They have access to Saudi millions They will install Shearer as manager Mort returning as chairman Deal should be done by Monday I cant reveal my sources but I can at 11.03am on Monday believe me if you want there im an itk now Not kicking you in the bollocks but surely if there are two rival consortiums meeting Ashley tonight, it would therefore imply competition and therefore a deal to be done by monday would be very very ambitious, especially by Ashley's standards. Agree that the KK issue has opended the door right up, but. Lets see if you are right on Monday hey? P.S. Why would Mort possibly want to return as Chairman given he probably had the chance to do so before now, with someone he knows and the Helm not some camel in the sand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 NUST buying club 5 Concortia Moat may be the only real bidder BUT Ashley is 100% the biggest cunt who won't sell us, thats the only real fact in any of this mess Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dover Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Two consortium meeting Ashley in London tonight They have access to Saudi millions They will install Shearer as manager Mort returning as chairman Deal should be done by Monday I cant reveal my sources but I can at 11.03am on Monday believe me if you want there im an itk now Not kicking you in the bollocks but surely if there are two rival consortiums meeting Ashley tonight, it would therefore imply competition and therefore a deal to be done by monday would be very very ambitious, especially by Ashley's standards. Agree that the KK issue has opended the door right up, but. Lets see if you are right on Monday hey? P.S. Why would Mort possibly want to return as Chairman given he probably had the chance to do so before now, with someone he knows and the Helm not some camel in the sand. Its was a joke...ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Er... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Two consortium meeting Ashley in London tonight They have access to Saudi millions They will install Shearer as manager Mort returning as chairman Deal should be done by Monday I cant reveal my sources but I can at 11.03am on Monday believe me if you want there im an itk now Not kicking you in the bollocks but surely if there are two rival consortiums meeting Ashley tonight, it would therefore imply competition and therefore a deal to be done by monday would be very very ambitious, especially by Ashley's standards. Agree that the KK issue has opended the door right up, but. Lets see if you are right on Monday hey? P.S. Why would Mort possibly want to return as Chairman given he probably had the chance to do so before now, with someone he knows and the Helm not some camel in the sand. I think he was taking the piss mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Two consortium meeting Ashley in London tonight They have access to Saudi millions They will install Shearer as manager Mort returning as chairman Deal should be done by Monday I cant reveal my sources but I can at 11.03am on Monday believe me if you want there im an itk now Not kicking you in the bollocks but surely if there are two rival consortiums meeting Ashley tonight, it would therefore imply competition and therefore a deal to be done by monday would be very very ambitious, especially by Ashley's standards. Agree that the KK issue has opended the door right up, but. Lets see if you are right on Monday hey? P.S. Why would Mort possibly want to return as Chairman given he probably had the chance to do so before now, with someone he knows and the Helm not some camel in the sand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/4668364.Ashley_will_not_sell_Newcastle_for_less_than___100m/ Mike Ashley will meet representatives of Tyneside businessman Barry Moat at the start of next week to discuss the future ownership of Newcastle United. Wonder if that's true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrisjraby Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Hasn't the whole issue been that Fat Cunt Ashley wouldn't accept less than £100 Million, and Moat's bid is less than that? Given his well-known stubbornness, he isn't going to sell for less... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Hasn't the whole issue been that Fat Cunt Ashley wouldn't accept less than £100 Million, and Moat's bid is less than that? Given his well-known stubbornness, he isn't going to sell for less... As I said before, I bet there's just one bid on the table and it's less than £100m. It's even backed by Seymour Pierce. Cue desperate attempts to make the club look in demand even though the price hasn't changed in months... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts