David28 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Sweden are the only team I could see us beating, but England's record against them is poor. Ukraine are a home nation and I think they'll win. I honestly think England are absolutely shite tbh. I have a Euro 92 feeling about this England side. A Greece Euro 2004 feeling I have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zach Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 On the bright side the fact were not anywhere near being favourites will ease the pressure off us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Sweden are the only team I could see us beating, but England's record against them is poor. Ukraine are a home nation and I think they'll win. I honestly think England are absolutely shite tbh. I have a Euro 92 feeling about this England side. A Greece Euro 2004 feeling I have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 TBF some of the Prima-Donnas and Divas aren't going to be there. Rio and a couple of others... Granted that still leaves three quarters of the team who have laughably bloated high opinions of themselves.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Team for the friendly: Hart; Johnson, Cahill, Terry, Cole; Milner, Gerrard, Parker, Oxlade-Chamberlain; Young, Welbeck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Decent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Looks shit! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Probably as good as can be expected Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Decent. Looks shit! I love it when massively contrasting opinions follow each other so quickly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taps01 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Team for the friendly: Hart; Johnson, Cahill, Terry, Cole; Milner, Gerrard, Parker, Oxlade-Chamberlain; Young, Welbeck. Is this official? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Team for the friendly: Hart; Johnson, Cahill, Terry, Cole; Milner, Gerrard, Parker, Oxlade-Chamberlain; Young, Welbeck. Is this official? Officially uninspiring. When's the game anyway? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Team for the friendly: Hart; Johnson, Cahill, Terry, Cole; Milner, Gerrard, Parker, Oxlade-Chamberlain; Young, Welbeck. Is this official? Think so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Can see that ultimately being the team we use against France. It is the best possible lineup we can muster from this shit squad (though I really don't want to see that cunt Terry there, would much rather see Lescott but I suppose there is some validity in using the Cahill-Terry CB partnership). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 That isn't too bad but there's just no goals in that team at all. Massively reliant on Young and Gerrard breaking forward and even then neither are prolific. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Hope he's just giving Wellbeck a go as I'd like to see us start with Carroll vs France. Could see him getting more and more confidence if he's selected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 I'm hoping that Oxlade-Chamberlain can be that "special something" in our team, the wildcard if you will. Could very well have a great tournament (if he starts that is!). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 If only Gerrard was'nt Captain so he didnt have to be picked Would play Ox and Parker in the centre and Young and Walcott on the wings and Carroll and Welbeck up top.... Bit attacking but who gives a sh*t no one expects us to doing anything including our selfs so might as well attack it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 If Rami starts, Carroll wont win as many aerial balls as some might think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 If Rami starts, Carroll wont win as many aerial balls as some might think. Tbh all 3 of France's CB's are big aggressive bastards.... Carroll would have a job on getting the better of any of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 If only Gerrard was'nt Captain so he didnt have to be picked Exactly, it's an absurd choice. Joe Hart all day long for me, said the same last time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 If only Gerrard was'nt Captain so he didnt have to be picked Exactly, it's an absurd choice. Joe Hart all day long for me, said the same last time. Hart as captain, really? Personally, I really don't see him as leadership material. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 If only Gerrard was'nt Captain so he didnt have to be picked Exactly, it's an absurd choice. Joe Hart all day long for me, said the same last time. Hart as captain, really? Personally, I really don't see him as leadership material. Why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Hart would be a decent choice imo, has a decent attitude (makes a point of shaking opponents hands at end of matches etc) and the role of the captain is overplayed anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 If only Gerrard was'nt Captain so he didnt have to be picked Exactly, it's an absurd choice. Joe Hart all day long for me, said the same last time. Hart as captain, really? Personally, I really don't see him as leadership material. Prefer him over an average footballer and a cunt to boot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Hart would be a decent choice imo, has a decent attitude (makes a point of shaking opponents hands at end of matches etc) and the role of the captain is overplayed anyway Yeah, as long as you have 3 or 4 players in your team with genuine leadership qualities it doesnt matter.... If we look at the Spain team that won the WC they had leaders all over the pitch, thats how you win things ( along with having genuine quality ofc) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts