AyeDubbleYoo Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 By the way, isn't using '@' to mean 'at a location' a fucking annoying thing to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 By the way, isn't using '@' to mean 'at a location' a fucking annoying thing to do. Aye. It's terrible English however you choose to look at it. Presumably what they meant was "The SportsDirect.com Stadium at St. James' Park" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Luque Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Commentators are going to love this. "And we're back for the second half here at The sportsdirect.com @ St James Park Stadium to bring you all the action." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 f*** OFF OUT OF TOWN MIKE ASHLEY YOU FAT f***ing PORK SCRATCHING OF A MAN AND TAKE YOUR HORRIBLE LITTLE SHOP OUT OF f***ing ELDON SQUARE, AND THE NEANDERTHALIC HALF WITS THAT WORK WITHIN. I am so shaking with rage right now. But, it's your birthday gift from Mike! I hope he's kept the receipt then so he can take it back! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Are media outlets legally bound to call it this bollocks? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Strange that people seem to have the idea that IF Sports Direct Sponsored St James' Park that would mean Ashley Sponsoring it with his own money. Ashley owns a percentage of Sports Direct, its not like their advertising budget comes out of Ashley's pocket.. He could have granted the sponsorship to them for free though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Are media outlets legally bound to call it this bollocks? I first read that without the word 'it' and it seemed like such a fantastic idea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Strange that people seem to have the idea that IF Sports Direct Sponsored St James' Park that would mean Ashley Sponsoring it with his own money. Ashley owns a percentage of Sports Direct, its not like their advertising budget comes out of Ashley's pocket.. He could have granted the sponsorship to them for free though. Do you really think their stock could get any lower round here? Yet their shops still get customers all over the region. Like it or not outside of the North East the sight of their logo in the name/on the stands will be a good advert given the publicity we get. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Are media outlets legally bound to call it this bollocks? I first read that without the word 'it' and it seemed like such a fantastic idea. The Times: THIS IS BOLLOCKS, The Guardian: BOLLOCKS @ ST JAMES, The Chronicle: NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS, HERE'S SOME MORE FUCKING BOLLOCKS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Are media outlets legally bound to call it this bollocks? I first read that without the word 'it' and it seemed like such a fantastic idea. The Times: THIS IS BOLLOCKS, The Guardian: BOLLOCKS @ ST JAMES, The Chronicle: NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS, HERE'S SOME MORE FUCKING BOLLOCKS. The Mail: IMMIGRANTS HAVE CAUSED THIS BOLLOCKS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobby_solano Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Are media outlets legally bound to call it this bollocks? I first read that without the word 'it' and it seemed like such a fantastic idea. The Times: THIS IS BOLLOCKS, The Guardian: BOLLOCKS @ ST JAMES, The Chronicle: NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS, HERE'S SOME MORE f***ing BOLLOCKS. hehehe nearly spat tea all over the monitor there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Are media outlets legally bound to call it this bollocks? I first read that without the word 'it' and it seemed like such a fantastic idea. The Times: THIS IS BOLLOCKS, The Guardian: BOLLOCKS @ ST JAMES, The Chronicle: NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS, HERE'S SOME MORE FUCKING BOLLOCKS. The Guardian headline is the best and quite a realistic future headline I feel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Are media outlets legally bound to call it this bollocks? I first read that without the word 'it' and it seemed like such a fantastic idea. The Times: THIS IS BOLLOCKS, The Guardian: BOLLOCKS @ ST JAMES, The Chronicle: NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS, HERE'S SOME MORE FUCKING BOLLOCKS. The Mail: IMMIGRANTS HAVE CAUSED THIS BOLLOCKS. Or: THANK GOD DIANA ISN'T ALIVE TO SEE THIS BOLLOCKS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 What a dick this man is. Please bring yourself and your family to the next home game Mike. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedudeabides Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 If I didn't know better, I could swear they were just taking the piss here. I think it's every one's duty to have a couple of extra pre-match pints on Saturday and to unleash a veritable tsunami of violence and destruction on the [email protected] Park Stadium. It worked getting shot of McKeag and Co, so you never know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Are media outlets legally bound to call it this bollocks? I first read that without the word 'it' and it seemed like such a fantastic idea. The Times: THIS IS BOLLOCKS, The Guardian: BOLLOCKS @ ST JAMES, The Chronicle: NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS, HERE'S SOME MORE FUCKING BOLLOCKS. The Mail: IMMIGRANTS HAVE CAUSED THIS BOLLOCKS. Or: THANK GOD DIANA ISN'T ALIVE TO SEE THIS BOLLOCKS YOUR TAXES ARE PAYING FOR THIS BOLLOCKS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Are media outlets legally bound to call it this bollocks? I first read that without the word 'it' and it seemed like such a fantastic idea. The Times: THIS IS BOLLOCKS, The Guardian: BOLLOCKS @ ST JAMES, The Chronicle: NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS, HERE'S SOME MORE FUCKING BOLLOCKS. The Mail: IMMIGRANTS HAVE CAUSED THIS BOLLOCKS. Or: THANK GOD DIANA ISN'T ALIVE TO SEE THIS BOLLOCKS YOUR TAXES ARE PAYING FOR THIS BOLLOCKS PAEDOPHILES ARE GROOMING YOUR KIDS TO LOVE THIS BOLLOCKS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Just read the wikipedia article and died a little inside :'( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc4eva Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Not really bothered about name change. Thought he was a cunt anyway. But the name will always be same to me anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Just read the wikipedia article and died a little inside :'( wiki said that Basle's St. Jakob Park was named after SJP. So now do they move to sportsdirect.com @ St. Jakob Park?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Five o Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 in my wildest dreams nightmare.... What a long, seriously fucked up name it is. Fuck off Ashley... (It is seriously weird that no mong have assaulted that fat wank yet) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Just read the wikipedia article and died a little inside :'( wiki said that Basle's St. Jakob Park was named after SJP. So now do they move to sportsdirect.com @ St. Jakob Park?! Probably too crass for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 I'd be more annoyed if the name made any sense. It's unacceptable either way of course but this is marketing 101 surely: the name is too long, makes no sense, you get lost half way in it when reading it even. I can't believe they are consistently this retarded in their decision making... as said they must just be taking the piss now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 I like how Ashley and Llambias make out that he puts £20m of HIS OWN MONEY into the club to keep it running afloat, yet he always gets something back in return. Like the thing on the Gallowgate stand, or the name of the stadium. So basically he's paying the club so he can promote his shit business. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now