Skirge Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Mug if he takes it on, better off where he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Mug if he takes it on, better off where he is. How? Bolton have the potential to at least be a mid-table Premier League club, Burnley have no money, Championship squad, it's a step up definitely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Mug if he takes it on, better off where he is. How? Bolton have the potential to at least be a mid-table Premier League club, Burnley have no money, Championship squad, it's a step up definitely. Not if he can't keep Bolton up, I can see him keeping Burnley up if he stays with them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I reckon Bolton would finish well above Burnley even if they'd stuck with Megson and Coyle stayed at Burnley. Looking at the table, they're only 2 adrift with 2 games in hand as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Mug if he takes it on, better off where he is. How? Bolton have the potential to at least be a mid-table Premier League club, Burnley have no money, Championship squad, it's a step up definitely. I don't see that potential at all, terrible bunch of players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Mug if he takes it on, better off where he is. How? Bolton have the potential to at least be a mid-table Premier League club, Burnley have no money, Championship squad, it's a step up definitely. I don't see that potential at all, terrible bunch of players. I think in Jaaskelainen, Cahill, Muamba & Klasnic, they have a good backbone to their side which should keep them up. Think they'll finish around about 14th. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 NUT knows his onions, he's right on this one. Bolton have a couple of canny wingers and Elmander could find his feet (at last) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Elmander isn't right for the premiership. One good defender out of 4 doesn't make a good defence, neither does one midfielder out of 4, and Kevin Davies is horrifically overrated. I do like Taylor though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Elmander isn't right for the premiership. One good defender out of 4 doesn't make a good defence, neither does one midfielder out of 4, and Kevin Davis is horrifically overrated. I do like Taylor though. really you think davies is overrated? I find him to be a very good player at what he does for the side. Bolton have some good players as well as some shit ones and no doubt there will be money available for transfers. Bolton are a step up from burnley as they already have a good set up in stadium and training facilities etc whereas burnley need a lot of work on theirs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Burnley play as a team, means much more than a squad with a few decent'ish players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Thing is with Davies, when he has a good game the pundits go mental for him, but this is only really the case for 1 in 4 games. He fails to make an impact in 75% of their games and they simply get swept under the carpet. Very much a 'can do no wrong' player. These same w***** pundits wouldn't want them anywhere near their clubs though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Thing is with Davies, when he has a good game the pundits go mental for him, but this is only really the case for 1 in 4 games. He fails to make an impact in 75% of their games and they simply get swept under the carpet. Very much a 'can do no wrong' player. These same w***** pundits wouldn't want them anywhere near their clubs though. And he fits with the type of football their fans want rid of under Coyle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I dont see why they want rid of that type of football!? If it works, why not keep it. They've got the players to implement it, to change their style would take alot of hard work and alot of investment with potentially disasterous consequences. I personally wouldnt be bothered if our football was wanky long ball shite, as long as it got us results. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 It doesn't work, they're going down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 They're getting Coyle, anyway. Compo agreed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Who does that leave for Burnley now? Strange. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Gone down in my estimations, if he does join. Not that he will be bothered Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I've heard Burnley are lining up an orange in Hull if Coyle goes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I've heard Burnley are lining up an orange in Hull if Coyle goes. lord help them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I dont see why they want rid of that type of football!? If it works, why not keep it. They've got the players to implement it, to change their style would take alot of hard work and alot of investment with potentially disasterous consequences. I personally wouldnt be bothered if our football was wanky long ball s****, as long as it got us results. The stadium is empty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Bet Burnley will go for Curbishley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I would love to see the first none human be appointed manager of a football team. Its disgusting how football ingnores the animal kingdom. I'd go for an octopus, clever as fuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I would love to see the first none human be appointed manager of a football team. Its disgusting how football ingnores the animal kingdom. I'd go for an octopus, clever as fuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 JimmyAnderson9 If anyone has Owen Coyle's phone number please call him before it's too late! There is still time! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I would love to see the first none human be appointed manager of a football team. Its disgusting how football ingnores the animal kingdom. I'd go for an octopus, clever as fuck. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3328480/Otto-the-octopus-wrecks-havoc.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now