Guest Heneage Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 SCJack, is it fair to say yesterday highlighted Swansea's problem, lots of possession not many goals? You seem a good side just missing a finisher. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mighty Toon Army Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 I was lucky enough to be hoyed out at half time. Our support was worse than the 11 numpties representing us on the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 I was lucky enough to be hoyed out at half time. Our support was worse than the 11 numpties representing us on the pitch. You were a state mate, surprised you can remember anything! Our support was pathetic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mighty Toon Army Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 It's a shame my solo renditions of "Our support is fucking shit" and "Ashley's a mong and we've got no songs" failed to catch on. I guess i'll get another chance at Watford. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 Lee Ryders "Ratings" : Harper 6 Simpson 6 Hall 6 Coloccini 5 Van Aanholt 5 Guthrie 6 Nolan 5 Smith 6 Routledge 6 Lovenkrands 5 Carroll 7 Subs: Best 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 Carroll 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groo Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 We made you look better, With respect, no you didn't. Over the past 3 seasons that has to be the most used sentence we've heard from fans of other teams after we outplay them. We attempt to play that way all the time, from the moment Martinez took over the reigns and Sousa plays with a similar philosophy. When we get it right the opposition does not get a look in. Lack of goals is our achilles heel at the moment, if we had some out and out goalscorers we would definately be top 2. Unfortunately we don't have the budget to go out and buy a proven goalscorer and as a team we work within a tight budget, our highest earner will be not more than 10-12K. As a Swansea supporter I'm worried about the vulture's circulating for our best players, Williams, Dyer, Allen, Pratley must already be turning heads. As a Newcastle fan too, I'm worried about the lack of team building for next season, if promoted. Last time round in this posistion, Keegan was building for the Premiership, players such as Cole were leading the way and a team was being built. What happens next year if Newcastle do go up?? Williamson and Routledge I rate that have been recent purchases, Coloccini is a must to keep. I remember Best from our League 1 days when Forest were after him, he chose Coventry instead and hardly pulled trees to to me the jury's still out. Of the rest Jonas and Taylor and maybe Enrique should have the quality. Newcastle MUST either spend a fortune to stay up OR get a first class manager with the tactical nouse (keep away from ours ). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 You played well but the fact we must have misplaced 90% of passes (5 yards or 50 yards all were shit) certainly helped, you kept the ball well but we gave it back to you nearly every time we had it and it wasnt down to pressure most of the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 Lee Ryders "Ratings" : Harper 6 Simpson 6 Hall 6 Coloccini 5 Van Aanholt 5 Guthrie 6 Nolan 5 Smith 6 Routledge 6 Lovenkrands 5 Carroll 7 Subs: Best 6 He's in need of a brain transplant if he thinks Coloccini and Nolan were as bad as each other, for me we didn't have anybody who was as good as Coloccini. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 Alan Oliver mark II, protect the wankers who give him the interviews and take cheap shots at the easier targets whenever possible. Absolute cunt of the highest order. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 The local rag is gonna lick the club's arse most of the time, especially of those who are also local/generally popular. You'd think people would have got used to it by now. Ryder is about as interesting as a shit but he's got an impossible job as the chief football correspondent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 Oliver was the same man, he had an obvious agenda against certain players whilst giving his usual 'ace' suspects ridiculously high ratings. There's just no need for it. I wish Robert had just burned the entire building down instead of thumping him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 Oliver was the same man, he had an obvious agenda against certain players whilst giving his usual 'ace' suspects ridiculously high ratings. There's just no need for it. I wish Robert had just burned the entire building down instead of thumping him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 That's truly embarrassing, unless Nolan's rating is actually the mental age that he was playing at. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 Lee Ryders "Ratings" : Harper 6 Simpson 6 Hall 6 Coloccini 5 Van Aanholt 5 Guthrie 6 Nolan 5 Smith 6 Routledge 6 Lovenkrands 5 Carroll 7 Subs: Best 6 What a prat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 Oh dear Lee. Objectivity and Journalism are supposed to go hand in hand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 john gibson is the only decent journalist in thomson house Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 16, 2010 Share Posted February 16, 2010 john gibson is the only decent journalist in thomson house wrong...he's just less crap thasn the rest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now