Jump to content

Roy Hodgson appointed new England manager


Ishmael

Recommended Posts

Guest Chubby Jason

Who cares what the moron Merson thinks? The man can't even string a sentence together, he's an absolute imbecile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ObiChrisKenobi

I shouldn't be surprised the sporting press have turned into complete mongoloids already, yet here I am - surprised. Poorly thought out opinion piece after opinion piece, which no one asked for. Stupid questions aimed at the same targets time and time again, painting a picture of a person before they've even managed a game. Tired of all their crap. I for one have banned them all from any and all future press conferences I may hold. Except Nixon, he may attend if he brings food.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Phil K

Er....the Southern rags (our most determined attackers, remember) are the ones who wanted Redknapp - NOT "the whole country"

The journo wankers like Martin Samuel and Mick Dennis wanted him, therefore they conclude, if they do, we all do

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest palnese

Roy Hodgson has said he will not choose a black player to be the new England captain, as he confirmed:

 

"I am looking for the white man for the job."

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Phil K

Awful air of negativity in the press conference like. :lol:

Yeah. There was a distinct "We're digging out our old turnip pictures for Photoshop" spiteful air about the tossers, wasn't there ?

I mean - the FA DIDN'T do as the rags told them.....no wonder they're p****d off - just like any petulant creeps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roy Hodgson has said he will not choose a black player to be the new England captain, as he confirmed:

 

"I am looking for the white man for the job."

 

 

 

;D That's why the South Africa question arose.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Arry would have gone to South Africa in the 70s and ended apartheid single-handedly if 'er indoor was willing to move from the south coast.

 

:lol:

 

Apartheid?  Triffic player but you'll have to ask the chairman.

:lol: :lol:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Howeh man. Of course Redknapp was the people's choice. Probably because there was little choice. We were still the minority that didn't want him, but most of us know by now that 'the people', as in the majority, are severely f***ing stupid, and it probably includes the people who will have an opinion on it because it's on the front page instead of the back one and know nothing about football.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye because those that know about football were literally screaming out for Woy to be appointed. Was at least 4 of them across the whole country.

 

'always-Woys, there are literally dozens of us'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poll on F365 has fans preferring Hodgson at 62% to Redknapp's 38% and a couple of other online polls I've seen have similar results - why are the media choosing to ignore this?

 

Rhetorical question obviously, but no less annoying. Twats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The English press is nothing but a collective of thick as pig-shit mongs who have ZERO interest in seeing England do well.

 

Those who understand football will see the long term benefit of installing Hodgson as England manager, as long as he is allowed to also run St George's park. He knows and understands what the game lacks at grassroots and I hope he will lay the foundations to improve what is a pathetic third rate infrastructure compared to how other associations operate.

 

Stick it to them all Roy old boy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Howeh man. Of course Redknapp was the people's choice. Probably because there was little choice. We were still the minority that didn't want him, but most of us know by now that 'the people', as in the majority, are severely f***ing stupid, and it probably includes the people who will have an opinion on it because it's on the front page instead of the back one and know nothing about football.

 

 

This pretty much sums it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A big factor that is being ignored is that Hodgson boasts varied international management experience and has managed in different countries - Redknapp has not. The experience you gain in other leagues/countries of the world is massive, as the different cultures/styles of play etc ensure you have a much wider view of how to coach etc.

 

Of course, it's just being dismissed as "yeah but winning titles in Scandinavia means NOTHING" by the press, tossers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's adored by shit journos because he is very willing to talk all the time, wouldn't surprise me if Redknapp, presumably furious behind closed doors, has told journos if they ever want a favour out of him again they should give Hodgson a hard time.

 

Pathetic though, it's the pretense that they are some kind of voice of the people, journalists are the eyes and ears of the public (as I have been taught on my journo course lol) not the voice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that the main argument against Roy (from what I've seen on Facebook anyway) is that he failed at Liverpool. Bullshit argument if you ask me.

 

Daily Mail's take was something along the lines of 'FA choose Liverpool flop' as a main headline. Whilst Martin Samuel cunted on in that article posted many pages back.

 

Followed by this self-congratulatory bullshit today: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2137536/Martin-Samuel-Roy-Hodgson--him.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...