Guest Roger Kint Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I just dont understand. People don't want old, experienced players because they're past it and have high waged demands? And they don't want players untested in the top league because 'they aren't good enough' What on earth do you want on a shoe-string budget?!? People want to complain, just like the puma thread, i just highlighted his last 3 seasons against Celtic/Europe, its not great but who cares he is still an improvement on what we have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Whats with the Celtic/European records? Who gives a shit when we wont be anywhere near challenging to beat teams on that level? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Whats with the Celtic/European records? Who gives a shit when we wont be anywhere near challenging to beat teams on that level? lol most of the Premier League are better than Celtic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Whats with the Celtic/European records? Who gives a s*** when we wont be anywhere near challenging to beat teams on that level? lol most of the Premier League are better than Celtic I hope that's sarcasm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 We're signing a guy who scores goals in Scotland for fun, quite literally hundreds, and we're signing him for free. All supposedly. And some people here still wouldn't have him. On a free. Christ, guys, what do you want? Liverpool giving us Torres and £100m for taking him off their hands? Wullie would turn his nose up at that deal as Torres is slightly injury prone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mofo Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Whats with the Celtic/European records? Who gives a shit when we wont be anywhere near challenging to beat teams on that level? lol most of the Premier League are better than Celtic What the fucks going on here?? Everyone saying he has not scored against celtic or scored many in europe?? could be because he had no service in those games. he's a goal poacher if you give him chances he will score. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 It turned out that Lovenkrands and Carroll started scoring lots of goals. And we no longer had to play that waste of space gangsta wannabe. Ranger is brilliant IMO. Ranger might not have scored many but he can actually contribute to team build up play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Would be a decent signing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Whats with the Celtic/European records? Who gives a s*** when we wont be anywhere near challenging to beat teams on that level? lol most of the Premier League are better than Celtic I hope that's sarcasm. You think Celtic would be one of the top teams in the Premiership? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 The fact that he has scored 50 goals in Scotland in the last two years, is little indication of how he would perform in the Premiership but neither is his poor record in Europe and against Celtic. Larsson wasn't bad outside Scotland and Ameobi has a pretty good record in Europe IIRC. Lies, damned lies and statistics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Whats with the Celtic/European records? Who gives a s*** when we wont be anywhere near challenging to beat teams on that level? lol most of the Premier League are better than Celtic I hope that's sarcasm. You think Celtic would be a top team in the Premiership? I dont, but I dont think they're worse that 3/4 of the PL. That's just fucking idiotic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 The fact that he has scored 50 goals in Scotland in the last two years, is little indication of how he would perform in the Premiership but neither is his poor record in Europe and against Celtic. Larsson wasn't bad outside Scotland and Ameobi has a pretty good record in Europe IIRC. Lies, damned lies and statistics. Exactly, take the overused example of Bassong for someone who was realtively poor until he came here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karjala Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Carroll Ameobi Lovenkrands Best Boyd Fuckin scary. Why the fuck did we sign Best, what a waste of time and money. 5 mediocre strikers to say the least. No hope of selling any of the cunts either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 If this Celtic team was in the premiership they would be battling relegation IMO, in fact that goes for every Celtic team since Martin O'Neill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I hate most of you. Goodnight. x Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amir_9 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Carroll Ameobi Lovenkrands Best Boyd Fuckin scary. Why the f*** did we sign Best, what a waste of time and money. 5 mediocre strikers to say the least. No hope of selling any of the c***s either. Carroll and Lovenkrands would do just fine under a midfield that provides them service constantly in the prem in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Carroll Ameobi Lovenkrands Best Boyd Fuckin scary. Why the fuck did we sign Best, what a waste of time and money. 5 mediocre strikers to say the least. No hope of selling any of the cunts either. To be fair we could sell all of our strikers to Championship clubs and Carroll might even attract a Premiership club. For me it's about squad building not deconstruction. If we sign Boyd then we can sell Shola or Best and dare i say make a profit out of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Could be like Doyle or Fletcher, could be like Scotland or McCoist. Gamble but low risk, I'd have him here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Whats with the Celtic/European records? Who gives a s*** when we wont be anywhere near challenging to beat teams on that level? lol most of the Premier League are better than Celtic I hope that's sarcasm. You think Celtic would be a top team in the Premiership? I dont, but I dont think they're worse that 3/4 of the PL. That's just fucking idiotic. the same Celtic team that got beat by Ross County, Kilmarnock and lost 4-0 to St Mirren. Aye fucking idiotic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 On that note, i'd prefer Fletcher. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Could be like Doyle or Fletcher, could be like Scotland or McCoist. Gamble but low risk, I'd have him here. much rather Fletcher than Boyd any day of the week Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 It turned out that Lovenkrands and Carroll started scoring lots of goals. And we no longer had to play that waste of space gangsta wannabe. Ranger is brilliant IMO. Ranger might not have scored many but he can actually contribute to team build up play. Yes, because he passed it 4 yards to Guthrie against Leicester. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karjala Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Carroll Ameobi Lovenkrands Best Boyd Fuckin scary. Why the fuck did we sign Best, what a waste of time and money. 5 mediocre strikers to say the least. No hope of selling any of the cunts either. To be fair we could sell all of our strikers to Championship clubs and Carroll might even attract a Premiership club. For me it's about squad building not deconstruction. If we sign Boyd then we can sell Shola or Best and dare i say make a profit out of it. I agree, but who the hell is gonna sign Shola or Best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Plenty of Championship teams will want both, especially Shola. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Plenty of Championship teams will want both, especially Shola. That's only a third of the job though - we still have to want to sell, and the player has to agree to go - neither of which I think will happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now