S.S.R. Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Kalou did that to us, didn't he? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 What was Kaboul playing at though? nothing challenge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Kalou did that to us, didn't he? Was much worse than that. You could have parked a plane between our back line and Kalou that day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Kalou did that to us, didn't he? Aye, but that was about 10 yards offside IIRC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 By the last camera angle, it's about an inch or so on the line. fucking difficult to predict if it's over even by replay. Unfair to blame the linesman for that. Spurs just wanted something other than their idiot of a goalkeeper to blame for it. Hardly unfair to blame the linesman if it wasn't over the line. If you're not sure, you don't give it. Would you be saying that if it was us, don't think so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 "if it wasn't over the line" - It was bar about a couple of centimeters man It's pettiness. It looked over the line from real play, the linesman gave the goal, I'd have gave goal, if it was at the other end Redknapp would have gave the goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 It is surprising that people aren't talking more about Gomes' howler, rather than the Linesman's decision. Redknapp will be on the phone tonight tapping up David James. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 What's with Chelsea not having grass in the goal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 What's with Chelsea not having grass in the goal? Can't afford it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 What's with Chelsea not having grass in the goal? It's a tribute to Prince William. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 good goal that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Good goal that by Olsson Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 What's with Chelsea not having grass in the goal? It's a tribute to Prince William. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Really dont know why this game is on second Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 By the last camera angle, it's about an inch or so on the line. f***ing difficult to predict if it's over even by replay. Unfair to blame the linesman for that. Spurs just wanted something other than their idiot of a goalkeeper to blame for it. You spout a rididculous amount of shit it has to be said. The rules state the linesman has to be 100% sure to give the goal. It's certain from his positioning and the way he took his time awarding the goal that he was not 100% sure so he basically altered the rules and went on a hunch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Good goal that by Olsson Starting to understand the hype now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 By the last camera angle, it's about an inch or so on the line. f***ing difficult to predict if it's over even by replay. Unfair to blame the linesman for that. Spurs just wanted something other than their idiot of a goalkeeper to blame for it. You spout a rididculous amount of shit it has to be said. The rules state the linesman has to be 100% sure to give the goal. It's certain from his positioning and the way he took his time awarding the goal that he was not 100% sure so he basically altered the rules and went on a hunch. http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/entries/icons/original/000/005/180/fuckthat.jpg?1302809593 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Everton fans are always so lifeless away from home. y u no stand? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 By the last camera angle, it's about an inch or so on the line. f***ing difficult to predict if it's over even by replay. Unfair to blame the linesman for that. Spurs just wanted something other than their idiot of a goalkeeper to blame for it. You spout a rididculous amount of s*** it has to be said. The rules state the linesman has to be 100% sure to give the goal. It's certain from his positioning and the way he took his time awarding the goal that he was not 100% sure so he basically altered the rules and went on a hunch. And it has to be said you spout as much shit. If it was at the other end, you'd have been on this forum defending the linesman all the way. Your bias means you can't see it though. He nodded his head straight afterwards to indicate that it crossed the line - he didn't 'take his time' at all. Just because he wasn't waving his flag around like a lunatic didn't mean that he wasn't sure. And the rules don't state "the linesman has to be 100% sure" - he has to make a decision and with everything presented to him, he made that decision. And 99/100 linesmen would make the same decision IMO. I'd certainly have given the goal. It's a real shame he isn't robo-cop and couldn't tell that an inch of the ball was still of the line, but hey that's life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 What an idiot. (Hugo) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 I thought Spurs and Redknapp were calling for technology rather than slating the linesman? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 By the last camera angle, it's about an inch or so on the line. f***ing difficult to predict if it's over even by replay. Unfair to blame the linesman for that. Spurs just wanted something other than their idiot of a goalkeeper to blame for it. You spout a rididculous amount of s*** it has to be said. The rules state the linesman has to be 100% sure to give the goal. It's certain from his positioning and the way he took his time awarding the goal that he was not 100% sure so he basically altered the rules and went on a hunch. And it has to be said you spout as much s***. If it was at the other end, you'd have been on this forum defending the linesman all the way. Your bias means you can't see it though. He nodded his head straight afterwards to indicate that it crossed the line - he didn't 'take his time' at all. Just because he wasn't waving his flag around like a lunatic didn't mean that he wasn't sure. And the rules don't state "the linesman has to be 100% sure" - he has to make a decision and with everything presented to him, he made that decision. And 99/100 linesmen would make the same decision IMO. I'd certainly have given the goal. It's a real shame he isn't robo-cop and couldn't tell that an inch of the ball was still of the line, but hey that's life. Got to feel for him really, it's batshit crazy we don't have goal line technology in this day an age. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 And it has to be said you spout as much shit. If it was at the other end, you'd have been on this forum defending the linesman all the way. Your bias means you can't see it though. He nodded his head straight afterwards to indicate that it crossed the line - he didn't 'take his time' at all. Just because he wasn't waving his flag around like a lunatic didn't mean that he wasn't sure. And the rules don't state "the linesman has to be 100% sure" - he has to make a decision and with everything presented to him, he made that decision. And 99/100 linesmen would make the same decision IMO. I'd certainly have given the goal. It's a real shame he isn't robo-cop and couldn't tell that an inch of the ball was still of the line, but hey that's life. Yeap, spot on Jonny. At full speed and first viewing I would have given it too. As Redknapp said, it was an honest decision, one the lino felt was the correct one. It was just wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Jones. :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 What the fuck was that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts