chicago_shearer Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1343541/Newcastle-lining-January-QPR-attacking-midfielder-Adel-Taarabt.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I can't see why QPR would sell one of their most influential players when they are pushing for promotion this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I can't see why QPR would sell one of their most influential players when they are pushing for promotion this season. £? Because he have loads of that don't we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Why would signing Taarabt mean the end of Jonas/him out of the side? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I can't see why QPR would sell one of their most influential players when they are pushing for promotion this season. £? Because he have loads of that don't we? Do you know how much we have for transfers? I'd asume following the Ashley model that we don't have 3-4mill to spunk on Adel Taarabt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Why would signing Taarabt mean the end of Jonas/him out of the side? Because i'm an optimist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Why would signing Taarabt mean the end of Jonas/him out of the side? Because i'm an optimist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pedro_de_geordieo Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Ashley is doing some strange stuff lately giving out 5.5 year deals, maybe he might just do something else strange and back his new manager? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Why would signing Taarabt mean the end of Jonas/him out of the side? Because i'm an optimist. Surely it'd be better to sign a left winger to play on the left wing if you want him out of the side so badly? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_F Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I can't see why QPR would sell one of their most influential players when they are pushing for promotion this season. £? Because he have loads of that don't we? And QPR really need the money !! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Warnock said today most clubs would not bid for player that does not pass & there system is built around him. No one is allowed to pass to him in there half & it only now he drops into defensive position but he still wont tackle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Ashley is doing some strange stuff lately giving out 5.5 year deals, maybe he might just do something else strange and back his new manager? It just doesn't make sense from QPRs point of view. Their team is doing well in the Championship, they're 4 points ahead with a game in hand to their closest rivals and are owned by a group of million/billionaires. I would assume that they don't desperately need the cash they would get for Taarabt unless it was ridiculous £££. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Why would signing Taarabt mean the end of Jonas/him out of the side? Because i'm an optimist. Surely it'd be better to sign a left winger to play on the left wing if you want him out of the side so badly? Clearly, but the article links Taarabt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Why would signing Taarabt mean the end of Jonas/him out of the side? Because i'm an optimist. Surely it'd be better to sign a left winger to play on the left wing if you want him out of the side so badly? Clearly, but the article links Taarabt. Which is exactly my point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 You've missed the point. If we were to sign Taarabt, Jonas would be on the bench, playing with his pigtails. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Is Taarabt not a player who would be more suited to playing off Carroll? Unless I'm mistaken he is one of those van der Vaart type players who floats about and prefers to play without any sort of responsibilities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hughesy Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 See ya, Jonas. Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Why would signing Taarabt mean the end of Jonas/him out of the side? Because i'm an optimist. Or an idiot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Can't believe we keep getting linked with Taarabt - it doesn't make a lot of sense. And we should be aiming for better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 You've missed the point. If we were to sign Taarabt, Jonas would be on the bench, playing with his pigtails. That would be a great idea. There'd be so much balance to the side with Taarabt on the left wing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Is Taarabt not a player who would be more suited to playing off Carroll? Unless I'm mistaken he is one of those van der Vaart type players who floats about and prefers to play without any sort of responsibilities. Taarabt is brilliant at picking the ball up deep and running at players. He'd be useful on either flank, imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Is Taarabt not a player who would be more suited to playing off Carroll? Unless I'm mistaken he is one of those van der Vaart type players who floats about and prefers to play without any sort of responsibilities. Taarabt is brilliant at picking the ball up deep and running at players. He'd be useful on either flank, imo. You're right on the first point but I don't think he'd work well on the wing. He doesn't work hard enough and would leave us short when we're defending. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Enrique is a very good defender, he can deal with a maverick/enigma in front on him. Olivier Bernard managed it, for crying out loud. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now