Guest kingdawson Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Nar, had him here when he was genuinely class, don't want him when he's slow and poor and mates wiv 'Arry. Slow? Poor? Sorry but that's simply not true. He's been great for us until the injury. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Woodgate clearly has fitness problems. If he was still any good, he'd be in the first team at Spurs. But he is first team? he'd probably be starting if fit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Nar, had him here when he was genuinely class, don't want him when he's slow and poor and mates wiv 'Arry. Slow? Poor? Sorry but that's simply not true. He's been great for us until the injury. Aye....... and how long has he been out injured for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Woodgate clearly has fitness problems. If he was still any good, he'd be in the first team at Spurs. But he is first team? he'd probably be starting if fit. But he's not fit, in fact Sol Campbell is currently light years ahead of him in the fitness stakes, which is criminal. Would be a good signing for Blackpool, where half fit he's better than any of their defenders, and by the end of the season he might get to a level of fitness to where he's can be a 1st teamer but IHMO he'll get injured way before that happens. It would be a dreadful signing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 It's a mixture of common sense and stubbornness that I don't want him. It's always 50/50 whether he'll even make a full comeback from any of his injuries. If someone loans him I wouldn't be the least surprised if he breaks down in his first game. Second, we've got a good, settled defence right now, no need to spoil it. Especially (and here's the stubborn part) just so we can give him back to Spurs if/when he gets back on form so he can help with their charge. Nothing against Spurs, I wouldn't want to loan any player from another PL club for those reasons. We're just getting the shit of his being unfit and off form to start with, just for them to steal him back when he comes good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Linked with a loan move for SWP - http://www.people.co.uk/sport/football/football-hotline/2010/12/26/toon-make-wright-move-in-january-102039-22805667/ Not everyone would be pleased at that, but I see him as an unfulfilled talent who perhaps just needs a coach who can get through to him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Been shit for ages. Dunno where he'd improve us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Woodgate clearly has fitness problems. If he was still any good, he'd be in the first team at Spurs. But he is first team? he'd probably be starting if fit. Which is kind of my point. Centre back isn't your strongest area IMO, so if you're prepared to loan him out, there's a problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Linked with a loan move for SWP - http://www.people.co.uk/sport/football/football-hotline/2010/12/26/toon-make-wright-move-in-january-102039-22805667/ Not everyone would be pleased at that, but I see him as an unfulfilled talent who perhaps just needs a coach who can get through to him. I'd take him on a 6 month loan deal, but no more then that. Adebayor would be a better option though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Been shit for ages. Dunno where he'd improve us. He's better than Routledge, gives us a decent option off the bench and it's cover for the wing. Would be pleased as long as it's just a loan. Rather him than Woodgate anyhow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Been shit for ages. Dunno where he'd improve us. He's better than Routledge, gives us a decent option off the bench and it's cover for the wing. Would be pleased as long as it's just a loan. Rather him than Woodgate anyhow. I'm really not sure about that. And if he's just going to be on bench duty I can't see him making an impression of any note. If he's gonna get anywhere near to the level he was at a few years ago he needs games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Purely a loan signing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 No way that we are going to pay his £70,000 a week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Woodgate clearly has fitness problems. If he was still any good, he'd be in the first team at Spurs. But he is first team? he'd probably be starting if fit. Which is kind of my point. Centre back isn't your strongest area IMO, so if you're prepared to loan him out, there's a problem. Yes the problem is his fitness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Woodgate clearly has fitness problems. If he was still any good, he'd be in the first team at Spurs. But he is first team? he'd probably be starting if fit. But he's not fit, in fact Sol Campbell is currently light years ahead of him in the fitness stakes, which is criminal. Would be a good signing for Blackpool, where half fit he's better than any of their defenders, and by the end of the season he might get to a level of fitness to where he's can be a 1st teamer but IHMO he'll get injured way before that happens. It would be a dreadful signing. Fair enough. Besides this injury he's been pretty much injury free since signing with us (altough this is a pretty long lay off tbf). In terms of his performances for us before getting injured, he was excellent but i can see why you wouldn't want to risk it tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 So he wouldn't be an excellent loan signing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 If he proves his fitness he would be is what i'm getting at. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 If he proves his fitness he would be is what i'm getting at. Redknapp doesn't seem to have much faith in that happening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 That's the thing, seems like Harry's giving up tbh. Figures sending him on loan gives a chance of someone else maybe being able to sort him through methods they've not thought of, or even just getting a bit of cash out of him by maybe saving wages, or a little loan fee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 I'm really not sure about that. And if he's just going to be on bench duty I can't see him making an impression of any note. If he's gonna get anywhere near to the level he was at a few years ago he needs games. I agree with that, if we're going to play a winger I'd rather it was Routledge who seems to have everything but confidence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 And just struggle on with him and Jonas as the only two wingers? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 And just struggle on with him and Jonas as the only two wingers? We're not struggling and I'd rather our own players got games than a player who could come here and go back to his club fitter and more confident. We brought players in last season and they were given games at the expense of players who are still here and less experienced for missing those games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 if we were going for a winger i'd rather it was a left sided one to provide competition/cover for jonas, while barton ain't a winger his performances on the right have me assured we're ok there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 SWP NO TO SWP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 That strikethrough just doesn't have the same effect with such big ass font Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now