Skirge Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Some people on here fucking amaze me, we won and are 3rd in the league , because of Pardew you sacks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Should have brought Sammy on instead of Loven if he wanted to protect Ben Arfa That's what I was thinking as well at the time. Sammy is a player who's always up for a scrap whereas Guthrie and Loven would just get knocked over under pressure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 What a fucking cunt. Nearly cost us two points with his shit subs. We are third in spite of this arsehole. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 What a f***ing c***. Nearly cost us two points with his s*** subs. We are third in spite of this arsehole. Serious? Yes. We are playing well because of the players that our scouts found. Not because we have been leaving Barfa on the bench and playing Lovenkrands ahead of plenty of much better players. What on earth are you on about man? Stop polluting the forum with absolute drivel at every attempt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Hi Alan, don't put those players on. kthxbai Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Santon, HBA, Marv & Sammy were sitting on the bench. 2 of those on the 60-70th minute mark (when it was clear we'd lost control of the game) would have done wonders for us in terms of holding onto the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayson Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Remembered reading this the other day and thinking it was odd. Danny Guthries name comes to mind quicker than Marveauxs ? And expanding on Ben Arfa’s involvement from the start of a game, Pardew added: “You could ask that about Santon, you could ask it about Danny Guthrie, Peter Lovenkrands, Shola Ameobi, Sylvain Marveaux or Danny Gosling. “We have players who are desperate to play. Worrying subs really. Was all ready to praise him like crazy to Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 I thought he got the subs wrong BUT you have to be an absolute knacker to criticise Pardew overall, he has done an excellent job Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dontooner Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Should have got sammy or Marveaux on... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 All you doom mongers, we have now went 10 games unbeaten in the Premier League, the last time we done that was in 1997! Viva la Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 He has done an exelent job overall, it's just irritating to look at the Wolves game today, and the QPR game just a few weeks back and see the exact same problems. He doesn't seem capable of changing it round tacticaly, or personel wise, when we're on the back foot. Once we're down we're down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teohgk Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 What a f***ing c***. Nearly cost us two points with his s*** subs. We are third in spite of this arsehole. Serious? Yes. We are playing well because of the players that our scouts found. Not because we have been leaving Barfa on the bench and playing Lovenkrands ahead of plenty of much better players. sacked the cunt bring in Bruce who motivate the scum to come back from 2-0 down Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 What a f***ing c***. Nearly cost us two points with his s*** subs. We are third in spite of this arsehole. Serious? Yes. We are playing well because of the players that our scouts found. Not because we have been leaving Barfa on the bench and playing Lovenkrands ahead of plenty of much better players. Made a bad decision, f*** knows why he brought on Lovenkrands...maybe Ba was carrying a knock? To say we are 3rd in spite of him is f***ing madness like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oakie Doke Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Bad substitutions. That is all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Can't understand why he has such a hard on for our shittest players. Alan Smith last season (thank god he got over him), now Loven this season, who has pointlessly been on every bench we've fielded this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Can't understand why he has such a hard on for our shittest players. Alan Smith last season (thank god he got over him), now Loven this season, who has pointlessly been on every bench we've fielded this season. I don't remember the Alan Smith thing... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Can't understand why he has such a hard on for our shittest players. Alan Smith last season (thank god he got over him), now Loven this season, who has pointlessly been on every bench we've fielded this season. I don't remember the Alan Smith thing... Well, he played him against WBA <_< Anyone who has followed us wouldn't let Alan Smith anywhere near the god damn stadium never mind the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Can't understand why he has such a hard on for our shittest players. Alan Smith last season (thank god he got over him), now Loven this season, who has pointlessly been on every bench we've fielded this season. I don't remember the Alan Smith thing... Well, he played him against WBA <_< Anyone who has followed us wouldn't let Alan Smith anywhere near the god damn stadium never mind the pitch. Hughton played Smith in more league games than Pardew did last season. There was no 'Smith thing' at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Can't understand why he has such a hard on for our shittest players. Alan Smith last season (thank god he got over him), now Loven this season, who has pointlessly been on every bench we've fielded this season. I don't remember the Alan Smith thing... Well, he played him against WBA <_< Anyone who has followed us wouldn't let Alan Smith anywhere near the god damn stadium never mind the pitch. He was the only central midfielder on the bench that day, and replaced Leon Best who had just come back from his op on his foot or whatever it was that he injured. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Can't understand why he has such a hard on for our shittest players. Alan Smith last season (thank god he got over him), now Loven this season, who has pointlessly been on every bench we've fielded this season. I don't remember the Alan Smith thing... Well, he played him against WBA <_< Anyone who has followed us wouldn't let Alan Smith anywhere near the god damn stadium never mind the pitch. Hughton played Smith in more league games than Pardew did last season. There was no 'Smith thing' at all. To be fair to Hughton, Smith did _incredibly_ well against Aston Villa in the 6-0. But whatever, I'll concede that Still can't deny that he fucking loves Loven for some reason. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Poor subs, but (rightly or wrongly) it was clear that he was attempting to protect the likes of HBA and Santon. It could have cost us the game, but didn't. We had our rub of the green but we played very well in the first half and got three points at a stadium where we've only won like twice before in the past (forget the statistic). Satisfied. First half performance outshines second half disappointment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Poor subs, but (rightly or wrongly) it was clear that he was attempting to protect the likes of HBA and Santon for the Spurs game. It could have cost us the game, but didn't. We had our rub of the green but we played very well in the first half and got three points at a stadium where we've only won like twice before in the past (forget the statistic). Satisfied. First half performance outshines second half disappointment. I really, really hope you're right. But from what we've seen there's absolutely no evidence for that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Didn't see the game today but he hasn't got much wrong all season. Sounds like a couple of substitutions weren't particularly great decisions, but we've come through with three points having protected some of the big names. From BBC it sounded like Wolves were flying into tackles on numerous occasions during the first half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolution Number 9 Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 It was the whole mentality man, us sitting back and inviting pressure never ever f***ing works and we only got away with the 3 points (or any points at all for that matter) due to bad refereeing, luck, Tim Krul and last ditch defending. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Logic Posted October 1, 2011 Share Posted October 1, 2011 Look, he apparently wanted to hold on to the lead. It made us vulnerable and tired the players quicker as Wolves attacked more and more. They had a legitimate penalty turned down and it was almost sheer luck they didn't score a second, which would have been a third had that penalty been given. We played pretty much the same game at QPR and got away with a draw by the skin of our teeth and looked poor into the bargain. Today could have easily been a loss and we looked dire at times in that second half. He's the manager, and if he can't work out what is quite plain to us - that makes us all wrong and he's got it right? Cabaye was close to fucked and had all but lost any semblance of running the midfield, but that was due to Pardews 2nd half gameplan imo. Had he brought Marveaux or Ben Arfa on the moment Ba took that knock everyone in the team would have had an outlet to aim for and relieve pressure, regaining momentum in attack. Guthrie was the correct decision once Cabaye had peaked, but it never needed to happen imo. When Ba got that bad knock he should have made two changes there and then. Given that the QPR game and West Brom last year has apparently taught him nothing I'm sad to say we won't maintain anything like this position in the table once the season starts getting tricky. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts