Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 We don't have a back up left back, reshuffles likes that are inevitable. Taylor on the left and Williamson in the middle is a change less. I'd rather have Taylor at right back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 We don't have a back up left back, reshuffles likes that are inevitable. Taylor on the left and Williamson in the middle is a change less. Taylor's not really a full back though, if he has to play there I would rather it was on the right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 We don't have a back up left back, reshuffles likes that are inevitable. Taylor on the left and Williamson in the middle is a change less. This is what I'd do as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 We don't have a back up left back, reshuffles likes that are inevitable. Taylor on the left and Williamson in the middle is a change less. I'd rather have Taylor at right back Why have two players out of position, when you can have one? We don't want to fuck with the defence too much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Simpsons played Left back for us before. Taylor is all right foot and not a full back so playing him at right back makes more sense than playing him at left back. ferguson isn't a left back anyway, he plays left side of midfield for the reserves/young uns. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Simpsons played Left back for us before. Taylor is all right foot and not a full back so playing him at right back makes more sense than playing him at left back. ferguson isn't a left back anyway, he plays left side of midfield for the reserves/young uns. This is what I would go with. I thought Ferguson was a left back that was being played on the wing though, or was he a left winger they were trying to convert into a left back? Or I could just be talking bollocks all round. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 ferguson isn't a left back anyway, he plays left side of midfield for the reserves/young uns. That the same Ferguson that played a blinder at Chelsea? At least he has shown he can play there well..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 ferguson isn't a left back anyway, he plays left side of midfield for the reserves/young uns. That the same Ferguson that played a blinder at Chelsea? At least he has shown he can play there well..... Didn't he play left wing against Chelsea, though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 ferguson isn't a left back anyway, he plays left side of midfield for the reserves/young uns. That the same Ferguson that played a blinder at Chelsea? At least he has shown he can play there well..... Didn't he play left wing against Chelsea, though? lb iirc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Simpsons played Left back for us before. Taylor is all right foot and not a full back so playing him at right back makes more sense than playing him at left back. ferguson isn't a left back anyway, he plays left side of midfield for the reserves/young uns. Taylor has played leftback for us before. We'll just have to wait and see what happens, Ferguson on the left wouldn't be the worst idea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 ferguson isn't a left back anyway, he plays left side of midfield for the reserves/young uns. That the same Ferguson that played a blinder at Chelsea? At least he has shown he can play there well..... Didn't he play left wing against Chelsea, though? No LB, unless you think Vuckic or Lovenkrands played LB instead? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EthiGeordie Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 3-5-1-1 Krul Taylor Colo Williamson Simo Barton Tiote Jonas Ferguson Rout Carroll It is essential to Double up Bale with Ferguson and Jonas... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 ferguson isn't a left back anyway, he plays left side of midfield for the reserves/young uns. That the same Ferguson that played a blinder at Chelsea? At least he has shown he can play there well..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 3-5-1-1 Krul Taylor Colo Williamson Simo Barton Tiote Jonas Ferguson Rout Carroll It is essential to Double up Bale with Ferguson and Jonas... Ah, the reverse Christmas tree formation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Will be interesting to see what we go with in place of Nolan with Guthrie also not available, if it's Smith Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Good job we have no strength in depth to replace these key men. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Will be interesting to see what we go with in place of Nolan with Guthrie also not available, if it's Smith Why is Guthrie not available? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 At least if Ferguson plays we have a greater than 2% chance of seeing a left wing cross land near a Black & White shirt today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakka Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Just about to get tube to white heart lane. Nervous, hope we can get something out of this game! Highly unlikely though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Apparently hasn't travelled, allegedly had a punch up last night. To be honest I don't think he is a great loss anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Apparently hasn't travelled, allegedly had a punch up last night. To be honest I don't think he is a great loss anyway. What kind of excuse is that? Carroll has a punch up every week yet still plays Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Will be interesting to see what we go with in place of Nolan with Guthrie also not available, if it's Smith Why is Guthrie not available? Didn't even travel, got into an incident in town last night (Not related to why he didn't travel, however) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 He wasnt traveling even before he went out and got into a punch up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Bit worried now, just seen Coloccini on the drink in Haringey Irish Centre Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts