Jump to content

John Carver


Guest neesy111

Recommended Posts

Its definitely Carver because the fat man doesnt pay any regard to results as is evidenced by his failure to sack Parsnip after only 5 wins in 2014, up until his little purple patch of wins.

 

All fat man looks at is the balance sheet.  Carver is the cheapest option and is already in situ, plus we do have some good players coming back from injury, so the likes of De Jong, Aarons, Obertan, Abeid, Santon et al who were all showing good form before injury, will be like new signings during the January transfer window, so fat man will have allowed himself to be persuaded that Carver can give us a mid table finish even if Sissoko is sold.

 

Mark my words well....this was decided the day they let Parsnip go to Palace.  This talk about Garde, Laudrup et al is just media talk.

 

If that's the case, why isn't he confirmed already?

 

They have to make it look like they've at least tried to find an alternative.

 

Next few days he'll be announced to the end of the season, and as long as he isn't a total disaster I really wouldn't be surprised to see him appointed permanently in the summer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its definitely Carver because the fat man doesnt pay any regard to results as is evidenced by his failure to sack Parsnip after only 5 wins in 2014, up until his little purple patch of wins.

 

All fat man looks at is the balance sheet.  Carver is the cheapest option and is already in situ, plus we do have some good players coming back from injury, so the likes of De Jong, Aarons, Obertan, Abeid, Santon et al who were all showing good form before injury, will be like new signings during the January transfer window, so fat man will have allowed himself to be persuaded that Carver can give us a mid table finish even if Sissoko is sold.

 

Mark my words well....this was decided the day they let Parsnip go to Palace.  This talk about Garde, Laudrup et al is just media talk.

 

If that's the case, why isn't he confirmed already?

 

They have to make it look like they've at least tried to find an alternative.

Next few days he'll be announced to the end of the season, and as long as he isn't a total disaster I really wouldn't be surprised to see him appointed permanently in the summer.

 

They really don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its definitely Carver because the fat man doesnt pay any regard to results as is evidenced by his failure to sack Parsnip after only 5 wins in 2014, up until his little purple patch of wins.

 

All fat man looks at is the balance sheet.  Carver is the cheapest option and is already in situ, plus we do have some good players coming back from injury, so the likes of De Jong, Aarons, Obertan, Abeid, Santon et al who were all showing good form before injury, will be like new signings during the January transfer window, so fat man will have allowed himself to be persuaded that Carver can give us a mid table finish even if Sissoko is sold.

 

Mark my words well....this was decided the day they let Parsnip go to Palace.  This talk about Garde, Laudrup et al is just media talk.

 

If that's the case, why isn't he confirmed already?

 

They have to make it look like they've at least tried to find an alternative.

 

Next few days he'll be announced to the end of the season, and as long as he isn't a total disaster I really wouldn't be surprised to see him appointed permanently in the summer.

 

He is a total disaster, and he'll still probably get it regardless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

If we get Carver, we get Carver. It'll last a few months at the most anyway, because we're pretty much guaranteed to nosedive down the league and then he'll have to go. Pardew was the biggest stumbling block, everything else is either success or failure imo. Pardew championed and aimed for mediocrity, I'd like to think that most other managers aren't like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is, there's nothing more brutally indicative about a club's ambition than it's managerial appointment. Mongish fans will spend forever arguing about good players and bad players, players who could get better, but if you're hiring a transparently crap manager with no record of anything but failure - and without the nous to placate and deceive fans verbally post-match - most supporters with a semblance of pride in NUFC will just stop going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carver would be the best appointment this lot could make.

 

The club has to be relegated - once, possible even twice, before Ashley will walk away. It's hard to accept but that's the way it is. To get our club back, our club has to be broken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's pretty clear they don't want Carver, and are hoping to avoid asking him to do a caretaker job till the end of the season. It might just come to that though.

 

If they don't want him then they would pay the going rate for someone of potential quality. They obviously haven't so far so that would suggest they are quite happy with him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is, there's nothing more brutally indicative about a club's ambition than it's managerial appointment. Mongish fans will spend forever arguing about good players and bad players, players who could get better, but if you're hiring a transparently crap manager with no record of anything but failure - and without the nous to placate and deceive fans verbally post-match - most supporters with a semblance of pride in NUFC will just stop going.

 

Spot on.

 

Fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we get Carver, we get Carver. It'll last a few months at the most anyway, because we're pretty much guaranteed to nosedive down the league and then he'll have to go. Pardew was the biggest stumbling block, everything else is either success or failure imo. Pardew championed and aimed for mediocrity, I'd like to think that most other managers aren't like that.

 

:thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's pretty clear they don't want Carver, and are hoping to avoid asking him to do a caretaker job till the end of the season. It might just come to that though.

 

If they don't want him then they would pay the going rate for someone of potential quality. They obviously haven't so far so that would suggest they are quite happy with him.

 

But they never pay the going rate for anyone, they've more as well admitted it's their policy to look for value. So I could quite well see them try to bring in Garde on the condition that he will work with the existing staff in the hope that they will quit of their own account and then Garde might be allowed to recruit his own staff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...